skip to main content
10.1145/3519391.3519407acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human balance ability assessment through Pneumatic Gel Muscle (PGM)-based Augmentation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite many articles and reports on balance ability evaluation with postural control, only a few studies have reported the relationship between sudden perturbations and variations in the centre of pressure (COP). This paper introduces automated control of a balance exercise suit equipped with pneumatic gel muscles (PGMs) to cause sudden perturbations. The effectiveness of this PGM suit has been quantitatively analysed for the first time in this paper. COP data were recorded while perturbation-based interventions were provided using the PGM suit during different standing conditions: single-leg standing, tandem, and closed and visual conditions: eyes open and closed. Eight indices were calculated from the COP data to visualize various patterns of balancing ability. The highest effect size values (comparing activated and deactivated PGM conditions) were observed for the variance of the trajectory (0.79) and sway area (0.70) indices during open-eyed single-leg standing posture.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

AHs_2022_16_movie.mp4.mp4

mp4

2.2 MB

References

  1. Maayan Agmon, Cynthia K Perry, Elizabeth Phelan, George Demiris, and Huong Q Nguyen. 2011. A pilot study of Wii Fit exergames to improve balance in older adults. Journal of geriatric physical therapy 34, 4 (2011), 161–167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hamid Barazesh and Maziar Ahmad Sharbafi. 2020. A biarticular passive exosuit to support balance control can reduce metabolic cost of walking. Bioinspiration & biomimetics 15, 3 (2020), 036009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Katherine Berg, Sharon Wood-Dauphine, JI Williams, and David Gayton. 1989. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 41, 6 (1989), 304–311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Katherine O Berg, Brian E Maki, Jack I Williams, Pamela J Holliday, and Sharon L Wood-Dauphinee. 1992. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 73, 11(1992), 1073–1080.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Simon Bouisset, James Richardson, and Maurice Zattara. 2000. Do anticipatory postural adjustments occurring in different segments of the postural chain follow the same organisational rule for different task movement velocities, independently of the inertial load value?Experimental brain research 132, 1 (2000), 79–86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wen-Dien Chang, Wan-Yi Chang, Chia-Lun Lee, and Chi-Yen Feng. 2013. Validity and reliability of wii fit balance board for the assessment of balance of healthy young adults and the elderly. Journal of physical therapy science 25, 10 (2013), 1251–1253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Swagata Das and Yuichi Kurita. 2020. ForceArm: a wearable pneumatic gel muscle (PGM)-based assistive suit for the upper limb. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics 2, 2 (2020), 269–281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Pamela W Duncan, Debra K Weiner, Julie Chandler, and Stephanie Studenski. 1990. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. Journal of gerontology 45, 6 (1990), M192–M197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ildar Farkhatdinov, Julia Ebert, Gijs Van Oort, Mark Vlutters, Edwin Van Asseldonk, and Etienne Burdet. 2019. Assisting human balance in standing with a robotic exoskeleton. IEEE Robotics and automation letters 4, 2 (2019), 414–421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fay B Horak, Diane M Wrisley, and James Frank. 2009. The balance evaluation systems test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Physical therapy 89, 5 (2009), 484–498.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. James Oat JudgeRoy, B Davis III, and Sylvia Õunpuu. 1996. Step length reductions in advanced age: the role of ankle and hip kinetics. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 51, 6 (1996), M303–M312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Neeta Kanekar and Alexander S Aruin. 2014. The effect of aging on anticipatory postural control. Experimental brain research 232, 4 (2014), 1127–1136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yasuo Kawakami, Toshiaki Oda, Toshiyuki Kurihara, Kentaro Chino, Toshihiko Nagayoshi, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Tetsuo Fukunaga, and Shinya Kuno. 2003. MUSCULOSKELETAL FACTORS INFLUENCING ANKLE JOINT RANGE OF MOTION IN THE MIDDLE-AGED AND ELDERLY INDIVIKUALS. Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine 52, Supplement(2003), 149–156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Michael Knox, Lucy Chipchase, Siobhan Schabrun, and Paul Marshall. 2016. Anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments in people with low back pain: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews 5 (04 2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0242-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ilan Kurz, Yoav Gimmon, Amir Shapiro, Ronen Debi, Yoram Snir, and Itshak Melzer. 2016. Unexpected perturbations training improves balance control and voluntary stepping times in older adults-a double blind randomized control trial. BMC geriatrics 16, 1 (2016), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Mark L Latash. 2008. Neurophysiological basis of movement. Human Kinetics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Martina Mancini, Arash Salarian, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, Cris Zampieri, Laurie King, Lorenzo Chiari, and Fay B Horak. 2012. ISway: a sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 9, 1(2012), 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Avril Mansfield, Anthony Aqui, Cynthia J Danells, Svetlana Knorr, Andrew Centen, Vincent G DePaul, Alison Schinkel-Ivy, Dina Brooks, Elizabeth L Inness, and George Mochizuki. 2018. Does perturbation-based balance training prevent falls among individuals with chronic stroke? A randomised controlled trial. BMJ open 8, 8 (2018), e021510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Avril Mansfield, Amy L Peters, Barbara A Liu, and Brian E Maki. 2010. Effect of a perturbation-based balance training program on compensatory stepping and grasping reactions in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Physical therapy 90, 4 (2010), 476–491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Labour Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2010. Comprehensive survey of living conditions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlotta Mummolo, William Z Peng, Shlok Agarwal, Robert Griffin, Peter D Neuhaus, and Joo H Kim. 2018. Stability of mina v2 for robot-assisted balance and locomotion. Frontiers in neurorobotics 12 (2018), 62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kazunori Ogawa, Chetan Thakur, Tomohiro Ikeda, Toshio Tsuji, and Yuichi Kurita. 2017. Development of a pneumatic artificial muscle driven by low pressure and its application to the unplugged powered suit. Advanced Robotics 31, 21 (2017), 1135–1143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Rhonda Orr, Jacqui Raymond, and Maria Fiatarone Singh. 2008. Efficacy of progressive resistance training on balance performance in older adults. Sports medicine 38, 4 (2008), 317–343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenichi Ozaki, Hitoshi Kagaya, Satoshi Hirano, Izumi Kondo, Shigeo Tanabe, Norihide Itoh, Eiichi Saitoh, Toshio Fuwa, and Ryo Murakami. 2013. Preliminary trial of postural strategy training using a personal transport assistance robot for patients with central nervous system disorder. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 94, 1(2013), 59–66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lien Quach, Andrew M Galica, Richard N Jones, Elizabeth Procter-Gray, Brad Manor, Marian T Hannan, and Lewis A Lipsitz. 2011. The nonlinear relationship between gait speed and falls: the maintenance of balance, independent living, intellect, and zest in the elderly of Boston study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 59, 6 (2011), 1069–1073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Marcio J Santos, Neeta Kanekar, and Alexander S Aruin. 2010. The role of anticipatory postural adjustments in compensatory control of posture: 2. Biomechanical analysis. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 20, 3 (2010), 398–405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M Tada. 2018. Wireless sensor and display modules for on-site motion measurement and intervention. In Proc. the 19th System Integration Symposium. 418–422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Shigeki Yamada, Yukihiko Aoyagi, Kazuo Yamamoto, and Masatsune Ishikawa. 2019. Quantitative evaluation of gait disturbance on an instrumented timed up-and-go test. Aging and disease 10, 1 (2019), 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Masataka Yamamoto, Yusuke Kishishita, Koji Shimatani, and Yuichi Kurita. 2019. Development of new soft wearable balance exercise device using pneumatic gel muscles. Applied Sciences 9, 15 (2019), 3108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AHs '22: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2022
    March 2022
    350 pages
    ISBN:9781450396325
    DOI:10.1145/3519391

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format