skip to main content
10.1145/3520304.3529043acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Regulatory genotype-to-phenotype mappings improve evolvability in genetic programming

Published:19 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most genotype-to-phenotype mappings in EAs are redundant, i.e., multiple genotypes can map to the same phenotype. Phenotypes are accessible from one to another through point mutations. However, these mutational connections can be unevenly distributed among phenotypes. Quantitative analysis of such connections helps better characterize the robustness and evolvability of an EA. In this study, we propose two genotype-to-phenotype mapping mechanisms for linear genetic programming (LGP), where the execution and output of a linear genetic program are varied by a regulator. We investigate how such regulatory mappings can alter the genotypic connections among different phenotypes and the robustness and evolvability of phenotypes. We also compare the search ability of LGP using the conventional mapping versus the regulatory mappings, and observe that the regulatory mappings improve the efficiency in all three search scenarios, including random walk, hill climbing, and novelty search.

References

  1. Markus Brameier and Wolfgang Banzhaf. 2007. Linear Genetic Programming. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ting Hu and Wolfgang Banzhaf. 2016. Quantitative analysis of evolvability using vertex centralities in phenotype network. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016. 733--740.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ting Hu and Wolfgang Banzhaf. 2018. Neutrality, robustness, and evolvability in genetic programming. In Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIV, R Riolo, B Worzel, B Goldman, and B Tozier (Eds.). Springer, Chapter 7, 101--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ting Hu, Wolfgang Banzhaf, and Jason H Moore. 2014. The effects of recombination on phenotypic exploration and robustness in evolution. Artificial Life 20, 4 (2014), 457--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ting Hu, Marco Tomassini, and Wolfgang Banzhaf. 2019. Complex network analysis of a genetic programming phenotype network. In European Conference on Genetic Programming. Springer, 49--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gregory F Lawler and Vlada Limic. 2010. Random walk: a modern introduction. Vol. 123. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Joel Lehman and Kenneth O Stanley. 2011. Novelty search and the problem with objectives. In Genetic programming theory and practice IX. Springer, 37--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Naoki Masuda, Mason A Porter, and Renaud Lambiotte. 2017. Random walks and diffusion on networks. Physics reports 716 (2017), 1--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Joshua L. Payne and Andreas Wagner. 2019. The causes of evolvability and their evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bart Selman and Carla P Gomes. 2006. Hill-climbing search. Encyclopedia of cognitive science 81 (2006), 82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Andreas Wagner. 2008. Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275, 1630 (2008), 91--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Regulatory genotype-to-phenotype mappings improve evolvability in genetic programming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '22: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
      July 2022
      2395 pages
      ISBN:9781450392686
      DOI:10.1145/3520304

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 July 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader