skip to main content
10.1145/3520304.3529080acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Exploring the decision and objective space of SAT constrained multi-objective problems

Published:19 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although most real-world problems include many constraints that limit the set of feasible solutions, there is significantly less study in constrained benchmark problems when compared to unconstrained ones. SAT constraints attempt to aid the study of constrained multi-objective optimization by allowing any number of equality and inequality constraints, with controllable feasibility ratio, to be added to state-of-the-art benchmark problems. This paper studies the features of SAT constraints by looking at some of their properties such as distribution, clustering and distance of feasible solutions in the decision and objective space when added to 0-1 multi-objective knapsack problems and multi-objective MNK-Landscapes.

References

  1. H. Aguirre and K. Tanaka. 2007. Working principles, behavior, and performance of MOEAs on MNK-landscapes. European Journal of Operational Research 181 (09 2007), 1670--1690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. H. E. Aguirre and K. Tanaka. 2004. Effects of elitism and population climbing on multiobjective MNK-landscapes. In Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat No.04TH8753), Vol. 1. 449--456 Vol.1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Biere, M. Heule, H. van Maaren, and T. Walsh. 2009. Handbook of Satisfiability: Volume 185 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press, NLD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Gokhan and S. Serpil. 2014. A new algorithm for generating all nondominated solutions of multiobjective discrete optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research 232, 3 (2014), 479--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. R. W. Hamming. 1950. Error detecting and error correcting codes. The Bell System Technical Journal 29, 2 (1950), 147--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. F. H. Ide, H. E. Aguirre, M. Miyakawa, and W. Darrell. 2021. A Generator for Scalable SAT Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization Benchmark Problems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Picard and J. Schiffmann. 2001. Realistic Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization Benchmark Problems from Design. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (2001), 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. Tanabe and A. Oyama. 2017. A note on constrained multi-objective optimization benchmark problems. In 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). 1127--1134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Verel, A. Liefooghe, L. Jourdan, and C. Dhaenens. 2013. On the structure of multiobjective combinatorial search space: MNK-landscapes with correlated objectives. European Journal of Operational Research 227, 2 (Jan. 2013), 331--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the decision and objective space of SAT constrained multi-objective problems

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '22: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
    July 2022
    2395 pages
    ISBN:9781450392686
    DOI:10.1145/3520304

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 July 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

    Upcoming Conference

    GECCO '24
    Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 14 - 18, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader