skip to main content
10.1145/3520495.3520496acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Exploratory Analysis of Human-centric Issues in Parking Solutions Using Surveys and Mobile Parking App Reviews

Published: 15 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Due to the imbalance between the supply and demand of parking spaces, parking has become difficult, and therefore significantly impacts people’s daily lives. Although some parking solutions have been developed to alleviate parking difficulties, few studies focus on exploring the human-centric aspects that affect parking difficulties. In order to determine the differences in parking difficulties faced by people with different human-centric characteristics, we conducted an online survey to collect information about different people’s human-centric aspects (age, gender, emotion, etc.), parking experiences, and parking preferences. Based on the responses from 189 car users, we found a significant relationship between car users’ emotions and their overall perception of parking difficulties. Also, other human-centric attributes, including gender, age, country, and parking preferences, are significantly related to the time spent in searching for available parking spaces. Additionally, we collected and manually categorized 1,192 user reviews of five parking apps available on the Google Play store. As a result, seven human-centric issue categories from the reviews were identified, including Parking Preferences & Habits, Autonomy, Emotion, Compatibility, Inclusiveness, Privacy & Reliability, and Socio-economic Aspect. Moreover, eight functionality issues are mainly discussed by users in the app reviews, including App Pre-Operation, Searching & Online Booking Function, Payment Function, UI & UX, App Workflow, App Information & Notification, App Operation Efficiency, and Feature Request. Based on a manual analysis of the reviews, we also found that different human-centric issues are often discussed together with particular functionality issues. Thus, we suggest that developers need to consider the importance of human-centric aspects by getting users involved in the process of app development to explore different requirements for diverse users. Moreover, exploring more user reviews on various platforms can serve to understand the human-centric challenges and needs in parking apps in order to improve user experiences.

References

[1]
Neha Arora, James Cook, Ravi Kumar, Ivan Kuznetsov, Yechen Li, Huai-Jen Liang, Andrew Miller, Andrew Tomkins, Iveel Tsogsuren, and Yi Wang. 2019. Hard to Park? Estimating Parking Difficulty at Scale. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2296–2304.
[2]
John L Campbell, Charles Quincy, Jordan Osserman, and Ove K Pedersen. 2013. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research 42, 3 (2013), 294–320.
[3]
M Ariel Cascio, Eunlye Lee, Nicole Vaudrin, and Darcy A Freedman. 2019. A team-based approach to open coding: Considerations for creating intercoder consensus. Field Methods 31, 2 (2019), 116–130.
[4]
Emmanouil Chaniotakis and Adam J Pel. 2015. Drivers’ parking location choice under uncertain parking availability and search times: A stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 82 (2015), 228–239.
[5]
Fernando Enríquez, Luis Miguel Soria, Juan Antonio Álvarez-García, Francisco Velasco, and Oscar Déniz. 2017. Existing approaches to smart parking: An overview. In International Conference on Smart Cities. Springer, 63–74.
[6]
Necmiye Genc-Nayebi and Alain Abran. 2017. A systematic literature review: Opinion mining studies from mobile app store user reviews. Journal of Systems and Software 125 (2017), 207–219.
[7]
Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss, and Elizabeth Strutzel. 1968. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research 17, 4 (1968), 364.
[8]
John Grundy. 2020. Human-centric Software Engineering for Next Generation Cloud-and Edge-based Smart Living Applications. In 2020 20th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing (CCGRID). IEEE, 1–10.
[9]
John Grundy, Hourieh Khalajzadeh, and Jennifer Mcintosh. 2020. Towards Human-centric Model-driven Software Engineering. In ENASE. 229–238.
[10]
John Grundy, Hourieh Khalajzadeh, Jennifer McIntosh, Tanjila Kanij, and Ingo Mueller. 2021. HumaniSE: Approaches to Achieve More Human-Centric Software Engineering. In Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering: 15th International Conference, ENASE 2020, Prague, Czech Republic, May 5–6, 2020, Revised Selected Papers 15. Springer International Publishing, 444–468.
[11]
Kathleen Hartzel. 2003. How self-efficacy and gender issues affect software adoption and use. Commun. ACM 46, 9 (2003), 167–171.
[12]
Thomas B Hodel and Suo Cong. 2003. Parking space optimization services, a uniformed web application architecture. In ITS world congress proceedings. 16–20.
[13]
Xin Huang, Xueqin Long, Jianjun Wang, and Lan He. 2020. Research on parking sharing strategies considering user overtime parking. Plos one 15, 6 (2020), e0233772.
[14]
Bassma Jioudi, Wafaa Dachry, Fouad Moutaouakkil, and Hicham Medromi. 2018. Literature Review of WSN MAC protocols in Smart parking. In 2018 IEEE/ACS 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA). IEEE, 1–6.
[15]
Wesley Kumfer, Dali Wei, and Hongchao Liu. 2015. Effects of Demographic and Driver Factors on Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Fatal Crashes: Investigation with Multinomial Logistic Regression. Transportation Research Record 2518, 1 (2015), 37–45.
[16]
Trista Lin, Hervé Rivano, and Frédéric Le Mouël. 2017. A survey of smart parking solutions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 18, 12(2017), 3229–3253.
[17]
Tejal Lotlikar, Minla Chandrahasan, Ankita Mahadik, Madhusmita Oke, and Anjali Yeole. 2016. Smart parking application. International Journal of Computer Applications 149, 9(2016), 32–37.
[18]
Rongxing Lu, Xiaodong Lin, Haojin Zhu, and Xuemin Shen. 2010. An intelligent secure and privacy-preserving parking scheme through vehicular communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 59, 6 (2010), 2772–2785.
[19]
Evie McCrum-Gardner. 2008. Which is the correct statistical test to use?British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 46, 1 (2008), 38–41.
[20]
Adam Millard-Ball, Rachel R Weinberger, and Robert C Hampshire. 2014. Is the curb 80% full or 20% empty? Assessing the impacts of San Francisco’s parking pricing experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 63 (2014), 76–92.
[21]
Elizabeth R Morrissey. 1974. Sources of error in the coding of questionnaire data. Sociological Methods & Research 3, 2 (1974), 209–232.
[22]
Srishti Nene, Shivani Mundle, Sakshi Mahajan, Samrudhi Yeginwar, and Leena Panchal. 2019. A Study of Vehicular Parking Systems. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Communication Technologies. Springer, 207–215.
[23]
Humphrey O Obie, Waqar Hussain, Xin Xia, John Grundy, Li Li, Burak Turhan, Jon Whittle, and Mojtaba Shahin. 2021. A First Look at Human Values-Violation in App Reviews. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS). IEEE, 29–38.
[24]
Hualiang Teng, Yi Qi, and David R Martinelli. 2008. Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs. Journal of Advanced Transportation 42, 2 (2008), 151–178.
[25]
Rajesh Vasa, Leonard Hoon, Kon Mouzakis, and Akihiro Noguchi. 2012. A preliminary analysis of mobile app user reviews. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 241–244.
[26]
Hongwei Wang and Wenbo He. 2011. A reservation-based smart parking system. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS). IEEE, 690–695.
[27]
Liehuang Zhu, Meng Li, Zijian Zhang, and Zhan Qin. 2018. ASAP: An anonymous smart-parking and payment scheme in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 17, 4 (2018), 703–715.
[28]
Fang Zong, Ping Yu, Jinjun Tang, and Xiao Sun. 2019. Understanding parking decisions with structural equation modeling. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 523 (2019), 408–417.
[29]
Pingping Zuo. 2019. A Study of Intelligent Parking Management in the Era of Big Data. In 2nd International Conference on Economy, Management and Entrepreneurship (ICOEME 2019). Atlantis Press, 644–647.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unveiling User Perspectives: Exploring Themes in Femtech Mobile App Reviews for Enhanced Usability and PrivacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765308:MHCI(1-21)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • (2024)How to effectively mine app reviews concerning software ecosystem? A survey of review characteristicsJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.112040213(112040)Online publication date: Jul-2024

Index Terms

  1. An Exploratory Analysis of Human-centric Issues in Parking Solutions Using Surveys and Mobile Parking App Reviews

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '21: Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 2021
    361 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 September 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Human-centric issues
    2. app reviews
    3. exploratory analysis
    4. parking apps
    5. parking solutions

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    OzCHI '21
    OzCHI '21: 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 30 - December 2, 2021
    VIC, Melbourne, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Unveiling User Perspectives: Exploring Themes in Femtech Mobile App Reviews for Enhanced Usability and PrivacyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36765308:MHCI(1-21)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
    • (2024)How to effectively mine app reviews concerning software ecosystem? A survey of review characteristicsJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.112040213(112040)Online publication date: Jul-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media