Clinical decision support for increased-risk organ transplants: participatory design.
Pages 14 - 25
Abstract
Currently there are over 1,600 Australians awaiting a life-saving organ transplant. Approximately 20% of potential donors have a history of behaviors before their death that increased their risk of acquiring and transmitting HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C to potential recipients. Donation and transplant professionals need to weigh the risks of disease transmission against the benefits of timely transplantation. Using participatory design methodology, we explored the design needs for a mobile and web-based disease transmission risk calculator to support transplant decisions. We held five design activities involving different occupation groups. Participants included donation and transplantation clinicians, coordinators, administrators, and specialist consultants. Methods included surveys, workshops, interviews, and usability studies. This paper describes our design process, presents the findings, and describes our design decisions and the resulting app. The application will soon be trialed within multiple hospitals in Australia.
References
[1]
ANZOD Registry. 2021. Section 11: Deceased Organ Transplant Wait List. Annual Report, 2021.
[2]
L. Sibulesky, I. Javed, J. D. Reyes and A. P. Limaye. 2015. Changing the Paradigm of Organ Utilization from Phs Increased-Risk Donors: An Opportunity Whose Time Has Come? Clin Transplant 29, 9, 724-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12582
[3]
K. M. J. Waller, N. L. De La Mata, B. M. Rosales, J. A. Hedley, P. J. Kelly, I. K. Thomson, M. J. O'Leary, E. Cavazzoni, V. Ramachandran, W. D. Rawlinson, K. R. Wyburn and A. C. Webster. 2021. Characteristics and Donation Outcomes of Potential Organ Donors Perceived to Be at Increased Risk for Blood Borne Virus Transmission: An Australian Cohort Study 2010-2018. Transplantation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000003715
[4]
K. M. Waller, N. L. De La Mata, P. J. Kelly, V. Ramachandran, W. D. Rawlinson, K. R. Wyburn and A. C. Webster. 2019. Residual Risk of Infection with Blood-Borne Viruses in Potential Organ Donors at Increased Risk of Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med J Aust 211, 9, 414-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50315
[5]
H. E. Fernandez, M. C. Chiles, M. Pereira, S. A. Husain, B. Miko, P. Baral, L. A. Dale, S. Patel, B. Runge, D. Tsapepas, P. R. Sandoval, L. E. Ratner, D. J. Cohen and S. Mohan. 2018. Outcomes for Potential Kidney Transplant Recipients Offered Public Health Service Increased Risk Kidneys: A Single-Center Experience. Clin Transplant 32, 12, e13427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13427
[6]
M. L. Volk, A. R. Wilk, C. Wolfe and D. R. Kaul. 2017. The "Phs Increased Risk" Label Is Associated with Nonutilization of Hundreds of Organs Per Year. Transplantation 101, 7, 1666-1669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001673
[7]
J. N. Marewski and G. Gigerenzer. 2012. Heuristic Decision Making in Medicine. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 14, 1, 77-89.
[8]
D Kahneman and A Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47, 2, 363-391.
[9]
Daniel Kahneman. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan,
[10]
B. Anderson, E. Jezewski, N. Sela, S. Westphal and A. Hoffman. 2021. Public Health Service Increased Risk Donor Kidney Grafts for Transplant into Children, a Survey of Pediatric Nephrologists. Pediatr Transplant 25, 2, e13863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/petr.13863
[11]
M. R. P. Sapiano, J. M. Jones, J. Bowman, M. E. Levi and S. V. Basavaraju. 2019. Impact of Us Public Health Service Increased Risk Deceased Donor Designation on Organ Utilization. Am J Transplant 19, 9, 2560-2569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15388
[12]
James AF Stoner. 1968. Risky and Cautious Shifts in Group Decisions: The Influence of Widely Held Values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4, 4, 442-459.
[13]
J Farkas. 2014. Errors of Commission Vs. Errors of Omission. Retrieved 01/01/2021, 2021 from https://emcrit.org/pulmcrit/errors-of-commission-vs-errors-of-omission/.
[14]
G. Elwyn, A. O'Connor, D. Stacey, R. Volk, A. Edwards, A. Coulter, R. Thomson, A. Barratt, M. Barry, S. Bernstein, P. Butow, A. Clarke, V. Entwistle, D. Feldman-Stewart, M. Holmes-Rovner, H. Llewellyn-Thomas, N. Moumjid, A. Mulley, C. Ruland, K. Sepucha, A. Sykes, T. Whelan and Collaboration International Patient Decision Aids Standards. 2006. Developing a Quality Criteria Framework for Patient Decision Aids: Online International Delphi Consensus Process. BMJ 333, 7565, 417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE
[15]
G. Elwyn, I. Scholl, C. Tietbohl, M. Mann, A. G. Edwards, C. Clay, F. Legare, T. van der Weijden, C. L. Lewis, R. M. Wexler and D. L. Frosch. 2013. "Many Miles to Go ...": A Systematic Review of the Implementation of Patient Decision Support Interventions into Routine Clinical Practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13 Suppl 2, S14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S14
[16]
A. Coulter, D. Stilwell, J. Kryworuchko, P. D. Mullen, C. J. Ng and T. van der Weijden. 2013. A Systematic Development Process for Patient Decision Aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13 Suppl 2, S2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S2
[17]
Eric R Stone, Alexis R Gabard, Aislinn E Groves and Isaac M Lipkus. 2015. Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes. Journal of health communication 20, 10, 1230-1241.
[18]
Rocio Garcia-Retamero and Edward T Cokely. 2017. Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics. Human factors 59, 4, 582-627.
[19]
Yunfeng Zhang, Rachel KE Bellamy and Wendy A Kellogg. Year. Designing Information for Remediating Cognitive Biases in Decision-Making. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. 2211-2220.
[20]
R. E. Patzer, M. Basu, C. P. Larsen, S. O. Pastan, S. Mohan, M. Patzer, M. Konomos, W. M. McClellan, J. Lea, D. Howard, J. Gander and K. J. Arriola. 2016. Ichoose Kidney: A Clinical Decision Aid for Kidney Transplantation Versus Dialysis Treatment. Transplantation 100, 3, 630-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001019
[21]
R. E. Patzer, L. McPherson, M. Basu, S. Mohan, M. Wolf, M. Chiles, A. Russell, J. C. Gander, J. J. Friedewald, D. Ladner, C. P. Larsen, T. Pearson and S. Pastan. 2018. Effect of the Ichoose Kidney Decision Aid in Improving Knowledge About Treatment Options among Transplant Candidates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Transplant 18, 8, 1954-1965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14693
[22]
M. L. Volk, M. Roney and A. Fagerlin. 2014. Pilot Test of a Patient Decision Aid About Liver Transplant Organ Quality. Liver Transpl 20, 7, 850-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.23882
[23]
E. J. Gordon, M. W. Sohn, C. H. Chang, G. McNatt, K. Vera, N. Beauvais, E. Warren, R. B. Mannon and M. G. Ison. 2017. Effect of a Mobile Web App on Kidney Transplant Candidates' Knowledge About Increased Risk Donor Kidneys: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Transplantation 101, 6, 1167-1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001273
[24]
K. Kawamoto, C. A. Houlihan, E. A. Balas and D. F. Lobach. 2005. Improving Clinical Practice Using Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review of Trials to Identify Features Critical to Success. BMJ 330, 7494, 765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F
[25]
Srikant Devaraj, Sushil K Sharma, Dyan J Fausto, Sara Viernes and Hadi Kharrazi. 2014. Barriers and Facilitators to Clinical Decision Support Systems Adoption: A Systematic Review. Journal of Business Administration Research 3, 2, 36.
[26]
K. Lamprell, Y. Tran, G. Arnolda and J. Braithwaite. 2021. Nudging Clinicians: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Literature. J Eval Clin Pract 27, 1, 175-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13401
[27]
Ana Caraban and Evangelos Karapanos. 2020. The'23 Ways to Nudge'framework: Designing Technologies That Influence Behavior Subtly. Interactions 27, 5, 54-58.
[28]
Simon Bowen, Kerry McSeveny, Eleanor Lockley, Daniel Wolstenholme, Mark Cobb and Andy Dearden. 2013. How Was It for You? Experiences of Participatory Design in the Uk Health Service. CoDesign 9, 4, 230-246.
[29]
Australian Organ and Tissue Authority. 2021. Australia's Potential Deceased Organ Donor Population and Transplantation Outcomes. Retrieved 2021 from https://www.donatelife.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020_organ_donation_is_rare_event.pdf.
[30]
Darren Lee, Nina Seng, Indra Gramnea, Fiona Hudson, Rohit L D'Costa, Leanne McEvoy, Joe John Sasadeusz, Gopal Basu, Joshua Y Kausman and Rosemary Masterson. 2020. Successful Implementation of Increased Viral Risk Donor Waiting List for Preconsented Waitlisted Recipients in Victoria. Nephrology 25, S3, 12.
[31]
A. Tong, P. Sainsbury and J. Craig. 2007. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (Coreq): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19, 6, 349-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
[32]
W. E. Abara, M. G. Collier, A. Moorman, D. Bixler, J. Jones, P. Annambhotla, J. Bowman, M. E. Levi, J. T. Brooks and S. V. Basavaraju. 2019. Characteristics of Deceased Solid Organ Donors and Screening Results for Hepatitis B, C, and Human Immunodeficiency Viruses - United States, 2010-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 68, 3, 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6803a2
[33]
S. A. Glynn, S. H. Kleinman, D. J. Wright, M. P. Busch and Nhlbi Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. 2002. International Application of the Incidence Rate/Window Period Model. Transfusion 42, 8, 966-972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00200.x
[34]
Matthias Söllner, Axel Hoffmann, Holger Hoffmann and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2011. Towards a Theory of Explanation and Prediction for the Formation of Trust in It Artifacts.
[35]
Matthias Söllner, Axel Hoffmann, Holger Hoffmann and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2012. How to Use Behavioral Research Insights on Trust for Hci System Design. In Chi'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems,1703-1708.
[36]
Roger C Mayer, James H Davis and F David Schoorman. 1995. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of management review 20, 3, 709-734.
[37]
M. Pilcher Dutch, D. 2019. You Can't Close the Window: Prevalence of Open Nucleic Periods in a Cohort of Australasian Potential Organ Donors. In Proceedings of Transplantation: A Decade of Growth and Collaboration, hosted by the Organ and Tissue Authority. Sydney. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000000879
[38]
S. C. Bergeson and J. D. Dean. 2006. A Systems Approach to Patient-Centered Care. JAMA 296, 23, 2848-2851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.23.2848
[39]
T. C. Hoffmann and C. B. Del Mar. 2014. Shared Decision Making: What Do Clinicians Need to Know and Why Should They Bother? Med J Aust 201, 9, 513-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja14.01124
Index Terms
- Clinical decision support for increased-risk organ transplants: participatory design.
Recommendations
Design and evaluation of a wireless decision-support system for heart rate variability study in haemodialysis follow-up procedures
In this paper a new wireless decision-support system for haemodialysis patients using heart rate variability (HRV) is presented. The telemedicine system provides connectivity to three participant sites: the general practitioner or nurse at the point of ...
A neutrosophic clinical decision-making system for cardiovascular diseases risk analysis
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. Early diagnosis of heart disease can reduce this large number of deaths so that treatment can be carried out. Many decision-making systems have been developed, but they are too complex for ...
A semi-supervised decision support system to facilitate antibiotic stewardship for urinary tract infections
AbstractUrinary Tract Infections (UTIs) are among the most frequently occurring infections in the hospital. Urinalysis and urine culture are the main tools used for diagnosis. Whereas urinalysis is sufficiently sensitive for detecting UTI, it ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2021
361 pages
ISBN:9781450395984
DOI:10.1145/3520495
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 15 September 2022
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
OzCHI '21
OzCHI '21: 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
November 30 - December 2, 2021
VIC, Melbourne, Australia
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 60Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)21
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format