skip to main content
10.1145/3520495.3520517acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conversational Agents Replying with a Manzai-style Joke

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automated conversational agents are becoming popular in various everyday contexts. In order to fulfill a more important role in human society, people would need to feel a sense of familiarity with such agents. To achieve this, we focus on humor, which enables familiar relationships between people and agents. In this study, we propose an interaction style of a pair of conversational agents that make humorous statements in conversation with users in real time, referring to the Japanese Manzai. In this method, a pair of agents, one making the joke and the other serving as the butt of the joke, perform humor in real time. The results of the experiment using the prototype system showed that when the agents performed humorous statements during conversations with users, the humans perceived that agent as expressing a sense of humor, and their motivation to continue the conversation increased.

References

  1. Stephan Diederich, Alfred Benedikt Brendel and Lutz Kolbe. 2019. On Conversational Agents in Information Systems Research: Analyzing the Past to Guide Future Work, Wirtschaftsinformatik.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apple Inc. Siri. Retrieved Oct 28, 2021 from https://www.apple.com/ios/siri/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Google LLC Google assistant. Retrieved Oct 28, 2021 from https://assistant.google.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Peter Khooshabeh, Sudeep Gandhe Cade McCall, Jonathan Gratch and James Blascovich 2011. Does it matter computer jokes. Proc. 2011 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 77-86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ewa Lugar and Abigail Sellen: Like Having a Really Bad PA. 2016. The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. Proc. 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5286-5297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Vera Q Liao, Muhammed Mas-ud Hussain, Praveen Chandar, Matthew Davis, Yasaman Khazaeni, Marco Patricio Crasso, Dakuo Wang, Michael Muller, N.Sadat Shami and Werner Geyer. 2018. All Work and no Play? Conversations with a Question and-Answer Chatbot in the Wild. Proc.2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marta Dynel. 2009. Beyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol.3, 1284-1299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Janet Holmes. 2006. Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol.38, 26-50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kazuki Haraguchi, Kazuki Yane, Akira Sato, Eiji Aramaki, Isao Miyashiro and Akiyo Nadamoto. 2020. Chat-type Manzai application: mobile daily comedy presentations based on automatically generated manzai scenarios. Proc. 2018 International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia. 143-152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dongkeon Lee, Seung-Ho Han, Kyo-Joong Oh, and Ho-Jin Choi. 2017. A temporal community contexts based funny joke generation. In Mobile Data Management. 2017 18th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management. Vol.1, 360-365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tomohiro Umetani, Satoshi Aoki, Kazuhiro Akiyama, Ryo Mashimo, Tatsuya Kitamura and Akiyo Nadamoto. 2016. Scalable Component-Based Manzai Robots as Automated Funny Content Generators. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, Vol.28, No.6, 862-869.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hans Wim Tinholt and Anton Nijholt. 2007. Computational humor : Utilizing cross-reference ambiguity for conversational jokes. In International Workshop on Fuzzy Logic and Applications, Vol.4578, 477–483.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Oliviero Stock and Carlo Strapparava. 2003. Getting serious about the development of computational humor. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 59–64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pawel Dybala, Michal Ptaszynski, Jacek Maciejewski, Mizuki Takahashi, Rafal Rzepk and Kenji Araki. 2010. Multiagent system for joke generation: Humor and emotions combined in human-agent conversation. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, Vol.2, 31-48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kenro Go, Daiji Nagaoka, Ryota Nakahara and Akihiro Miyata. 2020. A Conversational Agent Replying with a Humor by Topic-Word Substitution. Journal of Information Processing Society of Japan, Vol.61, No.1, 113-122 in Japanese.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. George A. Miller. 1995. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38, No.11, 39-41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tatsuo Abe. 2005. Manzai ni okeru "tukkomi" no ruikei to sono hyogenkoka(Types of "tsukkomi" and their expressive effects in manzai). Kokugogaku Kenkyu To Siryo, Vol 28, 48-60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Satoshi Kinsui. 1992. Boke to tukkomi - goyoron ni yoru manzai no kaiwa no bunseki - (Bokeh and Tsukkomi -An Analysis of Manzai Conversation Using Pragmatics-). Izumi Shoin Kamigata no bunka Kamigata kotoba no konzyaku, 62-90 in Japanese.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenro Go, Shion Tominaga, Yuta Muto and Akihiro Miyata. 2020 A Joking System Using Role-Separated Conversational Agents, Journal of Information Processing Society of Japan. Vol.61, No.8, 1353-1362 in Japanese.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. MeCab: Yet another part-of-speech and morphological analyzer, Retrieved Oct 28, 2021 from http://taku910.github.io/mecab/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Proc. ICLR’13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. National Institute of Information and Communications Technology: EDR Electronic Dictionary 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '21: Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 2021
    361 pages

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 September 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format