skip to main content
10.1145/3522749.3522750acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescceaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive Fixed-Time Constraint Control for Human-Robot Interaction with Uncertainties using Neural Networks

Published:13 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, a new control scheme using exponential-type barrier Lyapunov function (EBLF) is proposed for human-robot interaction, which can achieve high-performance trajectory tracking without dependence on the initial value. It has shown that the tracking error driven by the proposed control scheme will converge to a small set around equilibrium within a fixed time on different initial conditions. Moreover, human motion dynamics is captured by radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN) featured by universal approximation. Simulation results have demonstrated the satisfied performance of the developed control scheme.

References

  1. Vigen Arakelian. 2016. Gravity compensation in robotics. Advanced Robotics 30, 2 (2016), 79–96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mohamed Boukattaya, Neila Mezghani, and Tarak Damak. 2018. Adaptive nonsingular fast terminal sliding-mode control for the tracking problem of uncertain dynamical systems. ISA Transactions 77(2018), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. Chen and F. L. Lewis. 2011. Distributed Adaptive Tracking Control for Synchronization of Unknown Networked Lagrangian Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) 41, 3(2011), 805–816.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Zhang Chen, Ziwei Wang, Rongjian Liang, Bin Liang, and Tao Zhang. 2020. Virtual-joint based motion similarity criteria for human–robot kinematics mapping. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 125 (2020), 103412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. He, A. O. David, Z. Yin, and C. Sun. 2016. Neural Network Control of a Robotic Manipulator With Input Deadzone and Output Constraint. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 46, 6(2016), 759–770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Hirche and M. Buss. 2012. Human-Oriented Control for Haptic Teleoperation. Proc. IEEE 100, 3 (2012), 623–647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Li Ji, Qian Chunjiang, and M. T. Frye. [n.d.]. A dual observer design for global output feedback stabilization of nonlinear systems with low-order and high-order nonlinearities. In 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. 3351–3356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. Jiang, Q. Hu, and M. I. Friswell. 2016. Fixed-Time Attitude Control for Rigid Spacecraft With Actuator Saturation and Faults. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 24, 5(2016), 1892–1898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Xu Jin. 2017. Adaptive finite-time fault-tolerant tracking control for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems with output constraints. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 27, 5 (2017), 722–741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. X. Jin. 2019. Adaptive Fixed-Time Control for MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Asymmetric Output Constraints Using Universal Barrier Functions. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 64, 7 (2019), 3046–3053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tzuu-Hseng S. Li and Yun-Cheng Huang. 2010. MIMO adaptive fuzzy terminal sliding-mode controller for robotic manipulators. Information Sciences 180, 23 (2010), 4641–4660.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yongming Li, Shaocheng Tong, Lu Liu, and Gang Feng. 2017. Adaptive output-feedback control design with prescribed performance for switched nonlinear systems. Automatica 80(2017), 225–231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yan-Jun Liu, Shumin Lu, Shaocheng Tong, Xinkai Chen, C. L. Philip Chen, and Dong-Juan Li. 2018. Adaptive control-based Barrier Lyapunov Functions for a class of stochastic nonlinear systems with full state constraints. Automatica 87(2018), 83–93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Chaoxu Mu and Haibo He. 2018. Dynamic Behavior of Terminal Sliding Mode Control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 65, 4 (2018), 3480–3490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Polyakov. 2012. Nonlinear Feedback Design for Fixed-Time Stabilization of Linear Control Systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 57, 8 (2012), 2106–2110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Yanchao Sun, Xinyan Chen, Ziwei Wang, Hongde Qin, and Ruijie Jing. 2021. Adaptive interval type-2 fuzzy control for multi-legged underwater robot with input saturation and full-state constraints. International Journal of Systems Science(2021), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Keng Peng Tee, Beibei Ren, and Shuzhi Sam Ge. 2011. Control of nonlinear systems with time-varying output constraints. Automatica 47, 11 (2011), 2511–2516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mien Van, Michalis Mavrovouniotis, and Shuzhi Sam Ge. 2019. An Adaptive Backstepping Nonsingular Fast Terminal Sliding Mode Control for Robust Fault Tolerant Control of Robot Manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 49, 7(2019), 1448–1458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. T. Venkataraman and S. Gulati. 1993. Control of Nonlinear Systems Using Terminal Sliding Modes. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 115, 3 (1993), 554–560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ziwei Wang, Bin Liang, Yanchao Sun, and Tao Zhang. 2020. Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Prescribed-Time Control for Teleoperation Systems With Position Error Constraints. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 16, 7 (2020), 4889–4899.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Z. Wang, Y. Sun, and B. Liang. 2019. Synchronization control for bilateral teleoperation system with position error constraints: A fixed-time approach. ISA Trans 93(2019), 125–136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ziwei Wang, Yu Tian, Yanchao Sun, and Bin Liang. 2020. Finite-time output-feedback control for teleoperation systems subject to mismatched term and state constraints. Journal of the Franklin Institute 357, 16 (2020), 11421–11447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. Xu and X. Jin. 2013. State-Constrained Iterative Learning Control for a Class Of MIMO Systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 58, 5 (2013), 1322–1327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tao Xue, ZiWei Wang, Tao Zhang, Ou Bai, Meng Zhang, and Bin Han. 2020. Continuous Finite-Time Torque Control for Flexible Assistance Exoskeleton with Delay Variation Input. Robotica 39, 2 (2020), 291–316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tao Xue, Ziwei Wang, Tao Zhang, and Meng Zhang. 2019. Adaptive oscillator-based robust control for flexible hip assistive exoskeleton. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 4, 4 (2019), 3318–3323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Tao Xue, Zi-wei Wang, Tao Zhang, Ou Bai, Meng Zhang, and Bin Han. 2020. Fixed-time constrained acceleration reconstruction scheme for robotic exoskeleton via neural networks. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering 21, 5(2020), 705–722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. S. Yi and J. Zhai. 2019. Adaptive second-order fast nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for robotic manipulators. ISA Trans 90(2019), 41–51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Shuanghe Yu, Xinghuo Yu, Bijan Shirinzadeh, and Zhihong Man. 2005. Continuous finite-time control for robotic manipulators with terminal sliding mode. Automatica 41, 11 (2005), 1957–1964.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Dongya Zhao, Shaoyuan Li, and Feng Gao. 2009. A new terminal sliding mode control for robotic manipulators. Internat. J. Control 82, 10 (2009), 1804–1813.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Zongyu Zuo. 2015. Nonsingular fixed-time consensus tracking for second-order multi-agent networks. Automatica 54(2015), 305–309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CCEAI '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Control Engineering and Artificial Intelligence
    March 2022
    130 pages
    ISBN:9781450385916
    DOI:10.1145/3522749

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 April 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format