skip to main content
10.1145/3523111.3523113acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmvaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Semantic Segmentation Approach for Road Defect Detection and Quantification

Published:02 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automated visual detection and quantification of road defects has been a hot research topic for quite a long time due to its practical importance for road maintenance and traffic safety. However, uncertainties associated with the 2D images, such as non-uniformity of defects, insufficient background illumination, and etc., make it a challenging problem. This research work aims to solve the problem by employing a deep learning based approach. Specifically, image segmentation has been carried out, using a convolutional encoder-decoder model, to segment various defects from the non-defect area of the road. The method lead to a reasonable segmentation of different defects. Consequently, the extracted defect areas, in terms of number of pixels, are used to derive road condition indices being followed in Germany. In comparison, the indices derived using deep learning based approach are found to more accurate than those derived using conventional approach.

References

  1. 2006. Zusätzliche Technische Vertragsbedingungen und Richtlinien zur Zustandserfassung und -bewertung von Straßen.2006, geänderter und korrigierter Nachdruck 2018 unter Berücksichtigung des BMV ARS 6/2018 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Francois Blais, Marc Rioux, and J.-Angelo Beraldin. 1988. Practical Considerations For A Design Of A High Precision 3-D Laser Scanner System. In Optomechanical and Electro-Optical Design of Industrial Systems, Robert J. Bieringerand Kevin G. Harding (Eds.). Vol. 0959. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 225 – 246. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.947787Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wenming Cao, Qifan Liu, and Zhiquan He. 2020. Review of Pavement Defect Detection Methods. IEEE Access 8(2020), 14531–14544. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966881Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G Caroff, P Joubert, F Prudhomme, and G Soussain. 1989. Classification of pavement distresses by image processing (MACADAM SYSTEM). In Proc. ASCE. 46–51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sylvie Chambon and Jean-Marc Moliard. 2011. Automatic Road Pavement Assessment with Image Processing: Review and Comparison. International Journal of Geophysics 2011 (2011), 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tom B.J. Coenen and Amir Golroo. 2017. A review on automated pavement distress detection methods. Cogent Engineering 4, 1 (2017), 1374822. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1374822Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mark David Jenkins, Thomas Arthur Carr, Maria Insa Iglesias, Tom Buggy, and Gordon Morison. 2018. A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Semantic Pixel-Wise Segmentation of Road and Pavement Surface Cracks. In 2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). 2120–2124. https://doi.org/10.23919/EUSIPCO.2018.8553280Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, K. Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2009), 248–255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Wang Dong and Zhou Shisheng. 2008. Color Image Recognition Method Based on the Prewitt Operator. In 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Vol. 6. 170–173. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSE.2008.567Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Li Er-sen, Zhu Shu-long, Zhu Bao-shan, Zhao Yong, Xia Chao-gui, and Song Li-hua. 2009. An Adaptive Edge-Detection Method Based on the Canny Operator. In 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology, Vol. 1. 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESIAT.2009.49Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David A. Forsyth and Jean Ponce. 2012. Computer Vision - A Modern Approach, Second Edition.Pages 14-29, Pitman. 1–791 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kasthurirangan Gopalakrishnan. 2018. Deep Learning in Data-Driven Pavement Image Analysis and Automated Distress Detection: A Review. Data 3, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/data3030028Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hyun-Woo Cho Ju-Yeong Jung, Hyuk-Jin Yoon. 2018. A study on crack depth measurement in steel structures using image-based intensity differences. Adv. Civil Eng. 2018(2018), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7530943Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Shilpa Kamdi and Radha Krishna. 2012. Image Segmentation and Region Growing Algorithm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. Kanopoulos, N. Vasanthavada, and R.L. Baker. 1988. Design of an image edge detection filter using the Sobel operator. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 23, 2 (1988), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1109/4.996Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Byoung Jik Lee and Hosin “David” Lee. 2004. Position-Invariant Neural Network for Digital Pavement Crack Analysis. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 19, 2(2004), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00341.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00341.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. 2014. Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. In ECCV. 740–755.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Senthan Mathavan, Khurram Kamal, and Mujib Rahman. 2015. A Review of Three-Dimensional Imaging Technologies for Pavement Distress Detection and Measurements. Trans. Intell. Transport. Sys. 16, 5 (Oct. 2015), 2353–2362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2428655Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Microsoft. 2019. Visual Object Tagging Tool. https://github.com/microsoft/VoTTGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yong Shi, Limeng Cui, Zhiquan Qi, Fan Meng, and Zhensong Chen. 2016. Automatic Road Crack Detection Using Random Structured Forests. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 12(2016), 3434–3445. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2552248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. L Sjogren and Petra Offrell. 2000. Automatic crack measurement in Sweden. In SURF 2000: Fourth International Symposium on pavement Surface Characteristics on Roads and AirfieldsWorld Road Association (PIARC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ke Sun, Bin Xiao, Dong Liu, and Jingdong Wang. 2019. Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimation. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. KC Wang, Zhiqiong Hou, and Weiguo Gong. 2008. Automation techniques for digital highway data vehicle (DHDV). In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Manag. Pavement Assets. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wikipedia contributors. 2021. Image segmentation — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image_segmentation&oldid=1053962860 [Online; accessed 14-November-2021].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Fan Yang, Lei Zhang, Sijia Yu, Danil Prokhorov, Xue Mei, and Haibin Ling. 2019. Feature Pyramid and Hierarchical Boosting Network for Pavement Crack Detection. arxiv:1901.06340 [cs.CV]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lei Zhang, Fan Yang, Yimin Daniel Zhang, and Ying Julie Zhu. 2016. Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 3708–3712. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533052Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Bolei Zhou, Hang Zhao, Xavier Puig, Tete Xiao, Sanja Fidler, Adela Barriuso, and Antonio Torralba. 2018. Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Dataset. International Journal on Computer Vision (IJCV) (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Semantic Segmentation Approach for Road Defect Detection and Quantification
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICMVA '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Machine Vision and Applications
              February 2022
              128 pages
              ISBN:9781450395670
              DOI:10.1145/3523111

              Copyright © 2022 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 2 May 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format