ABSTRACT
Recommendation system often suffers from popularity bias. Often the training data inherently exhibits long-tail distribution in item popularity (data bias). Moreover, the recommendation systems could give unfairly higher recommendation scores to popular items even among items a user equally liked, resulting in over-recommendation of popular items (model bias). In this study we propose a novel method to reduce the model bias while maintaining accuracy by directly regularizing the recommendation scores to be equal across items a user preferred. Akin to contrastive learning, we extend the widely used pairwise loss (BPR loss) which maximizes the score differences between preferred and unpreferred items, with a regularization term that minimizes the score differences within preferred and unpreferred items, respectively, thereby achieving both high debias and high accuracy performance with no additional training. To test the effectiveness of the proposed method, we design an experiment using a synthetic dataset which induces model bias with baseline training; we showed applying the proposed method resulted in drastic reduction of model bias while maintaining accuracy. Comprehensive comparison with earlier debias methods showed the proposed method had advantages in terms of computational validity and efficiency. Further empirical experiments utilizing four benchmark datasets and four recommendation models indicated the proposed method showed general improvements over performances of earlier debias methods. We hope that our method could help users enjoy diverse recommendations promoting serendipitous findings. Code available at https://github.com/stillpsy/popbias.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Presentation video and slides
- Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2017. Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems. 42–46.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019. Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking. In The thirty-second international flairs conference.Google Scholar
- Himan Abdollahpouri, Masoud Mansoury, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2020. The connection between popularity bias, calibration, and fairness in recommendation. In Fourteenth ACM conference on recommender systems. 726–731.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gediminas Adomavicius, Alexander Tuzhilin, Shlomo Berkovsky, Ernesto W De Luca, and Alan Said. 2010. Context-awareness in recommender systems: research workshop and movie recommendation challenge. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 385–386.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ashton Anderson, Lucas Maystre, Ian Anderson, Rishabh Mehrotra, and Mounia Lalmas. 2020. Algorithmic effects on the diversity of consumption on spotify. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 2155–2165.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy Aridor, Duarte Goncalves, and Shan Sikdar. 2020. Deconstructing the filter bubble: User decision-making and recommender systems. In Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 82–91.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, and Mirko Marras. 2021. Connecting user and item perspectives in popularity debiasing for collaborative recommendation. Information Processing & Management 58, 1 (2021), 102387.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2020. Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03240(2020).Google Scholar
- Jiawei Chen, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2021. Bias Issues and Solutions in Recommender System: Tutorial on the RecSys 2021. In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 825–827.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eunjoon Cho, Seth A Myers, and Jure Leskovec. 2011. Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 1082–1090.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sumit Chopra, Raia Hadsell, and Yann LeCun. 2005. Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), Vol. 1. IEEE, 539–546.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yingqiang Ge, Shuya Zhao, Honglu Zhou, Changhua Pei, Fei Sun, Wenwu Ou, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2020. Understanding echo chambers in e-commerce recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 2261–2270.Google ScholarDigital Library
- F Maxwell Harper and Joseph A Konstan. 2015. The movielens datasets: History and context. Acm transactions on interactive intelligent systems (tiis) 5, 4(2015), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval. 639–648.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173–182.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thorsten Joachims, Adith Swaminathan, and Tobias Schnabel. 2017. Unbiased learning-to-rank with biased feedback. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 781–789.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yehuda Koren. 2008. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 426–434.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Phuc H Le-Khac, Graham Healy, and Alan F Smeaton. 2020. Contrastive representation learning: A framework and review. IEEE Access 8(2020), 193907–193934.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mingyang Li, Hongchen Wu, and Huaxiang Zhang. 2019. Matrix factorization for personalized recommendation with implicit feedback and temporal information in social ecommerce networks. IEEE Access 7(2019), 141268–141276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhuang Liu, Yunpu Ma, Yuanxin Ouyang, and Zhang Xiong. 2021. Contrastive learning for recommender system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.01317(2021).Google Scholar
- Jiwen Lu, Junlin Hu, and Jie Zhou. 2017. Deep metric learning for visual understanding: An overview of recent advances. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34, 6 (2017), 76–84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Masoud Mansoury, Himan Abdollahpouri, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Bamshad Mobasher, and Robin Burke. 2020. Feedback loop and bias amplification in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on information & knowledge management. 2145–2148.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tien T Nguyen, Pik-Mai Hui, F Maxwell Harper, Loren Terveen, and Joseph A Konstan. 2014. Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. 677–686.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aaron van den Oord, Yazhe Li, and Oriol Vinyals. 2018. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748(2018).Google Scholar
- Yoon-Joo Park and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2008. The long tail of recommender systems and how to leverage it. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems. 11–18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2012. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2618(2012).Google Scholar
- Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Ashudeep Singh, Navin Chandak, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Recommendations as treatments: Debiasing learning and evaluation. In international conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1670–1679.Google Scholar
- Florian Schroff, Dmitry Kalenichenko, and James Philbin. 2015. Facenet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 815–823.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harald Steck. 2011. Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 125–132.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gábor Takács, István Pilászy, Bottyán Németh, and Domonkos Tikk. 2008. Matrix factorization and neighbor based algorithms for the netflix prize problem. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems. 267–274.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiliang Tang, Huiji Gao, and Huan Liu. 2012. mTrust: Discerning multi-faceted trust in a connected world. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 93–102.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mengting Wan and Julian J. McAuley. 2018. Item recommendation on monotonic behavior chains. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 2-7, 2018, Sole Pera, Michael D. Ekstrand, Xavier Amatriain, and John O’Donovan (Eds.). ACM, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3240369Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mengting Wan, Rishabh Misra, Ndapa Nakashole, and Julian J. McAuley. 2019. Fine-Grained Spoiler Detection from Large-Scale Review Corpora. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, Anna Korhonen, David R. Traum, and Lluís Màrquez (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2605–2610. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-1248Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Deconfounded recommendation for alleviating bias amplification. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1717–1725.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Meng Wang, Fuli Feng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Neural graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. 165–174.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tianxin Wei, Fuli Feng, Jiawei Chen, Ziwei Wu, Jinfeng Yi, and Xiangnan He. 2021. Model-agnostic counterfactual reasoning for eliminating popularity bias in recommender system. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1791–1800.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mi Zhang and Neil Hurley. 2008. Avoiding monotony: improving the diversity of recommendation lists. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems. 123–130.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Tianxin Wei, Chonggang Song, Guohui Ling, and Yongdong Zhang. 2021. Causal intervention for leveraging popularity bias in recommendation. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 11–20.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zihao Zhao, Jiawei Chen, Sheng Zhou, Xiangnan He, Xuezhi Cao, Fuzheng Zhang, and Wei Wu. 2021. Popularity Bias Is Not Always Evil: Disentangling Benign and Harmful Bias for Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07946(2021).Google Scholar
- Yu Zheng, Chen Gao, Xiang Li, Xiangnan He, Yong Li, and Depeng Jin. 2021. Disentangling user interest and conformity for recommendation with causal embedding. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 2980–2991.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang Zhou, Jianxin Ma, Jianwei Zhang, Jingren Zhou, and Hongxia Yang. 2021. Contrastive learning for debiased candidate generation in large-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 3985–3995.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ziwei Zhu, Yun He, Xing Zhao, Yin Zhang, Jianling Wang, and James Caverlee. 2021. Popularity-opportunity bias in collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 85–93.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ziwei Zhu, Jianling Wang, and James Caverlee. 2020. Measuring and mitigating item under-recommendation bias in personalized ranking systems. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 449–458.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Countering Popularity Bias by Regularizing Score Differences
Recommendations
The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Music Recommendation: A Reproducibility Study
Advances in Information RetrievalAbstractResearch has shown that recommender systems are typically biased towards popular items, which leads to less popular items being underrepresented in recommendations. The recent work of Abdollahpouri et al. in the context of movie recommendations ...
Investigating the impact of recommender systems on user-based and item-based popularity bias
AbstractRecommender Systems are decision support tools that adopt advanced algorithms in order to help users to find less-explored items that can be interesting for them. While recommender systems may offer a range of attractive benefits, they ...
Highlights- We measure reinforced recommendation-driven popularity bias on several algorithms.
Escaping your comfort zone
A recommender system based on a positively-related item-graph targeted for novel and relevant recommendations is proposed.A live test was performed comparing the proposed system with a state-of-the-art matrix factorization algorithm.The proposed system ...
Comments