skip to main content
10.1145/3523227.3546782acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reducing Cross-Topic Political Homogenization in Content-Based News Recommendation

Published: 13 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Content-based news recommenders learn words that correlate with user engagement and recommend articles accordingly. This can be problematic for users with diverse political preferences by topic — e.g., users that prefer conservative articles on one topic but liberal articles on another. In such instances, recommenders can have a homogenizing effect by recommending articles with the same political lean on both topics, particularly if both topics share salient, politically polarized terms like “far right” or “radical left.” In this paper, we propose attention-based neural network models to reduce this homogenization effect by increasing attention on words that are topic specific while decreasing attention on polarized, topic-general terms. We find that the proposed approach results in more accurate recommendations for simulated users with such diverse preferences.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (recsys_video_presentation.mp4)
Presentation video
MP4 File (recsys_video_presentation.mp4)
Presentation video

References

[1]
Himan Abdollahpouri. 2019. Popularity Bias in Ranking and Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Honolulu, HI, USA) (AIES ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 529–530. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314309
[2]
Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130–1132.
[3]
Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2020. Auditing news curation systems: A case study examining algorithmic and editorial logic in apple news. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 36–47.
[4]
Rahul Bhargava, Anna Chung, Neil S Gaikwad, Alexis Hope, Dennis Jen, Jasmin Rubinovitz, Belén Saldías-Fuentes, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2019. Gobo: A system for exploring user control of invisible algorithms in social media. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 151–155.
[5]
Ceren Budak, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao. 2016. Fair and balanced? Quantifying media bias through crowdsourced content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 80, S1 (2016), 250–271.
[6]
L. Elisa Celis, Sayash Kapoor, Farnood Salehi, and Nisheeth Vishnoi. 2019. Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287601
[7]
Allison JB Chaney, Brandon M Stewart, and Barbara E Engelhardt. 2018. How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 224–232.
[8]
Sneha Chaudhari, Varun Mithal, Gungor Polatkan, and Rohan Ramanath. 2019. An attentive survey of attention models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02874(2019).
[9]
Uthsav Chitra and Christopher Musco. 2020. Analyzing the impact of filter bubbles on social network polarization. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 115–123.
[10]
P. Dandekar, A. Goel, and D. T. Lee. 2013. Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 15 (Mar 2013), 5791–5796. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217220110
[11]
Daniel DellaPosta. 2020. Pluralistic collapse: The “oil spill” model of mass opinion polarization. American Sociological Review 85, 3 (2020), 507–536.
[12]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805(2018).
[13]
Soumen Ganguly, Juhi Kulshrestha, Jisun An, and Haewoon Kwak. 2020. Empirical Evaluation of Three Common Assumptions in Building Political Media Bias Datasets. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 14. 939–943.
[14]
Kiran Garimella, Tim Smith, Rebecca Weiss, and Robert West. 2021. Political Polarization in Online News Consumption. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 15. 152–162.
[15]
R Kelly Garrett. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of computer-mediated communication 14, 2 (2009), 265–285.
[16]
Linmei Hu, Chen Li, Chuan Shi, Cheng Yang, and Chao Shao. 2020. Graph neural news recommendation with long-term and short-term interest modeling. Information Processing & Management 57, 2 (2020), 102142.
[17]
William G Jacoby. 2018. Neither Liberal Nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Political Science Quarterly 133, 4 (2018), 758–761.
[18]
Sarthak Jain and Byron C Wallace. 2019. Attention is not explanation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10186(2019).
[19]
M Jurkowitz and A Mitchell. 2020. About one-fifth of Democrats and Republicans get political news in a kind of media buble. Pew Research Center (2020).
[20]
Dhruv Khattar, Vaibhav Kumar, Vasudeva Varma, and Manish Gupta. 2018. Weave&rec: A word embedding based 3-d convolutional network for news recommendation. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1855–1858.
[21]
Sami Khenissi and Olfa Nasraoui. 2020. Modeling and Counteracting Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems. arxiv:2001.04832 [cs.IR]
[22]
Zhouhan Lin, Minwei Feng, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Mo Yu, Bing Xiang, Bowen Zhou, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. A structured self-attentive sentence embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03130(2017).
[23]
Ping Liu, Karthik Shivaram, Aron Culotta, Matthew A Shapiro, and Mustafa Bilgic. 2021. The Interaction between Political Typology and Filter Bubbles in News Recommendation Algorithms. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 3791–3801.
[24]
Ruibo Liu, Lili Wang, Chenyan Jia, and Soroush Vosoughi. 2021. Political Depolarization of News Articles using Attribute-Aware Word Embeddings. In ICWSM.
[25]
Shikun Liu, Edward Johns, and Andrew J. Davison. 2019. End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attention. arxiv:1803.10704 [cs.CV]
[26]
Emma Lurie and Eni Mustafaraj. 2019. Opening Up the Black Box: Auditing Google’s Top Stories Algorithm. In The Thirty-Second International Flairs Conference.
[27]
Masoud Mansoury, Himan Abdollahpouri, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Bamshad Mobasher, and Robin Burke. 2020. Feedback Loop and Bias Amplification in Recommender Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2145–2148. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412152
[28]
Farzan Masrour, Tyler Wilson, Heng Yan, Pang-Ning Tan, and Abdol Esfahanian. 2020. Bursting the Filter Bubble: Fairness-Aware Network Link Prediction. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 841–848.
[29]
Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3111–3119.
[30]
Jonathan Mummolo. 2016. News from the other side: How topic relevance limits the prevalence of partisan selective exposure. The Journal of Politics 78, 3 (2016), 763–773.
[31]
Tien T Nguyen, Pik-Mai Hui, F Maxwell Harper, Loren Terveen, and Joseph A Konstan. 2014. Exploring the filter bubble: the effect of using recommender systems on content diversity. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. 677–686.
[32]
Ruchi Ookalkar, Kolli Vishal Reddy, and Eric Gilbert. 2019. Pop: Bursting News Filter Bubbles on Twitter Through Diverse Exposure. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 18–22.
[33]
Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
[34]
Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, Alban Desmaison, Andreas Kopf, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Martin Raison, Alykhan Tejani, Sasank Chilamkurthy, Benoit Steiner, Lu Fang, Junjie Bai, and Soumith Chintala. 2019. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32. 8024–8035. http://papers.neurips.cc/paper/9015-pytorch-an-imperative-style-high-performance-deep-learning-library.pdf
[35]
Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of machine learning research 12, Oct (2011), 2825–2830.
[36]
Pew Research Center. 2021. Beyond red vs. blue: The political typology. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/11/09/beyond-red-vs-blue-the-political-typology-2/. Accessed: 2021-12-01.
[37]
Markus Prior. 2013. Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science 16 (2013), 101–127.
[38]
Tao Qi, Fangzhao Wu, Chuhan Wu, Peiru Yang, Yang Yu, Xing Xie, and Yongfeng Huang. 2021. HieRec: Hierarchical user interest modeling for personalized news recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.04408(2021).
[39]
Zhaopeng Qiu, Yunfan Hu, and Xian Wu. 2022. Graph Neural News Recommendation with User Existing and Potential Interest Modeling. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 16, 5(2022), 1–17.
[40]
Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virgílio AF Almeida, and Wagner Meira Jr. 2020. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 131–141.
[41]
Sebastian Ruder. 2017. An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05098(2017).
[42]
Sofia Serrano and Noah A Smith. 2019. Is Attention Interpretable?. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2931–2951.
[43]
Yotam Shmargad and Samara Klar. 2020. Sorting the news: How ranking by popularity polarizes our politics. Political Communication 37, 3 (2020), 423–446.
[44]
Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander M. Rush. 2020. HuggingFace’s Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing. arxiv:1910.03771 [cs.CL]
[45]
Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Mingxiao An, Jianqiang Huang, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. 2019. NPA: neural news recommendation with personalized attention. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 2576–2584.
[46]
Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Suyu Ge, Tao Qi, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. 2019. Neural news recommendation with multi-head self-attention. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 6389–6394.
[47]
Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Tao Qi, and Yongfeng Huang. 2021. Empowering news recommendation with pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1652–1656.
[48]
Guixian Xu, Yueting Meng, Zhan Chen, Xiaoyu Qiu, Changzhi Wang, and Haishen Yao. 2019. Research on topic detection and tracking for online news texts. IEEE access 7(2019), 58407–58418.
[49]
Yongxin Yang and Timothy M Hospedales. 2016. Trace norm regularised deep multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04038(2016).
[50]
Zichao Yang, Diyi Yang, Chris Dyer, Xiaodong He, Alex Smola, and Eduard Hovy. 2016. Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies. 1480–1489.
[51]
Qi Zhang, Jingjie Li, Qinglin Jia, Chuyuan Wang, Jieming Zhu, Zhaowei Wang, and Xiuqiang He. 2021. UNBERT: User-News Matching BERT for News Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). 3356–3362.
[52]
Qiannan Zhu, Xiaofei Zhou, Zeliang Song, Jianlong Tan, and Li Guo. 2019. Dan: Deep attention neural network for news recommendation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 5973–5980.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Integrating User Sentiment and Behavior for Explainable RecommendationWeb and Big Data. APWeb-WAIM 2024 International Workshops10.1007/978-981-96-0055-7_12(135-148)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Explaining Neural News Recommendation with Attributions onto Reading HistoriesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/367323316:1(1-25)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A Hierarchical and Disentangling Interest Learning Framework for Unbiased and True News RecommendationProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671944(3200-3211)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Reducing Cross-Topic Political Homogenization in Content-Based News Recommendation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      RecSys '22: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      September 2022
      743 pages
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 13 September 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Filter Bubbles
      2. News Recommendation Systems
      3. Topic Homogenization

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • National Science Foundation

      Conference

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)Integrating User Sentiment and Behavior for Explainable RecommendationWeb and Big Data. APWeb-WAIM 2024 International Workshops10.1007/978-981-96-0055-7_12(135-148)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2025
      • (2024)Explaining Neural News Recommendation with Attributions onto Reading HistoriesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/367323316:1(1-25)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
      • (2024)A Hierarchical and Disentangling Interest Learning Framework for Unbiased and True News RecommendationProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671944(3200-3211)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
      • (2024)MANA-Net: Mitigating Aggregated Sentiment Homogenization with News Weighting for Enhanced Market PredictionProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3679653(2379-2389)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
      • (2023)DDRCN: Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Recommendation Framework Fused with Deep Cross NetworksApplied Sciences10.3390/app1304255513:4(2555)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Application of Methods of Recommendations in the Analysis of Computer ComponentsVìsnik Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu "Lʹvìvsʹka polìtehnìka". Serìâ Ìnformacìjnì sistemi ta merežì10.23939/sisn2023.14.08414(84-98)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media