skip to main content
10.1145/3523286.3524588acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Application of EMG and Machine Learning in Human Machine Interface

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Myocontrol is the intuitive control of a neural prosthetic via the user's voluntary muscular activations detected in the form of surface EMG(electromyography) signals. This type of control is usually implemented by means of pattern recognition, which uses a set of training data to create a machine learning model that can decipher these muscular electrical activations. EMG myocontrol is now widely used in multiple fields such as clinical medicine and human-computer interfacing. However, the usefulness of myocontrol depends greatly on the accuracy of the collected EMG signal. Some of the factors that cause inaccuracy include the interference of adjacent muscle, the inherent instability of the signals acquired from the human body (e.g. unexpected changes in the sEMG caused by sweating, electrodes displacement, muscle fatigue or specific postures and motions of the body segments ). Today, researchers focus on finding problems and propose new concepts of models that could make improvements. This review examines the application of EMG myocontrol in hand gesture recognition and neural prostheses, the shortages of EMG and surface EMG(sEMG) signal, as well as the solutions to some current issues.

References

  1. Ceolini Enea, Frenkel Charlotte, Shrestha Sumit Bam, Taverni Gemma, Khacef Lyes, Payvand Melika, Donati Elisa, Hand-Gesture Recognition Based on EMG and Event-Based Camera Sensor Fusion: A Benchmark in Neuromorphic Computing, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Volume 14, 2020, Page 637,Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Amina Ben Haj Amor; OussamaEl Ghoul; Mohamed Jemni (2017). 2017 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility (ICTA)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. E. Benalcázar , "Real-time hand gesture recognition using the Myo armband and muscle activity detection," 2017 IEEE Second Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), 2017, pp. 1-6, DOI: 10.1109/ETCM.2017.8247458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lobov, S.A., Krylova, N.P., Anisimova, A.P. Optimizing the Speed and Accuracy of an EMG Interface in Practical Applications. Hum Physiol 45, 145–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119719010109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eric J. Fimbel, Martin Lemay, Martin Arguin,Speed–accuracy trade-offs in myocontrol, Human Movement Science, Volume 25, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 165-180, ISSN 0167-9457, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.12.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Dec 1;117(11):1215-30. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00162.2014. Epub 2014 Oct 2. PMID: 25277737; PMCID: PMC4254845.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. Trigueiros, F. Ribeiro and L. P. Reis, "A comparison of machine learning algorithms applied to hand gesture recognition," 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012), 2012, pp. 1-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ambrosini E, Ferrante S, Schauer T, Klauer C, Gaffuri M, Ferrigno G, Pedrocchi A. A myocontrolled neuroprosthesis integrated with a passive exoskeleton to support upper limb activities. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Apr;24(2):307-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Jan 31. PMID: 24529798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jonghwa Kim, Stephan Mastnik, and Elisabeth André. 2008. EMG-based hand gesture recognition for realtime biosignal interfacing. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 30–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1378773.1378778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Masson*, F. S. Fortuna*, F. S. Moura*, D. C. Soriano*. (2016) INTEGRATING MYO ARMBAND FOR THE CONTROL OF MYOELECTRIC UPPER LIMB PROSTHESIS. (This work presents a friendly interface for processing and analyzing myoelectric signals aiming to control upper limb prosthesis using Myo® armband, a low cost gesture control device)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Young, B. Stephens-Fripp, A. Gillett, H. Zhou and G. Alici, "Pattern Recognition for Prosthetic Hand User's Intentions using EMG Data and Machine Learning Techniques," 2019 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 2019, pp. 544-550, DOI: 10.1109/AIM.2019.8868766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. R. Ahsan, M. I. Ibrahimy and O. O. Khalifa, "Electromygraphy (EMG) signal based hand gesture recognition using artificial neural network (ANN)," 2011 4th International Conference on Mechatronics (ICOM), 2011, pp. 1-6, DOI: 10.1109/ICOM.2011.5937135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lunardini F., Casellato C., Sanger T.D., Pedrocchi A. (2017) Synergy-Based Myocontrol of a Two Degree of Freedom Robotic Arm in Children with Dystonia. In: Ibáñez J., González-Vargas J., Azorín J., Akay M., Pons J. (eds) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation II. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46669-9_98Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yang, Dp., Zhao, Jd., Gu, Yk. An anthropomorphic robot hand developed based on underactuated mechanism and controlled by EMG signals. J Bionic Eng 6, 255–263 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Durandau, G., Farina, D., Asín-Prieto, G. Voluntary control of wearable robotic exoskeletons by patients with paresis via neuromechanical modeling. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 16, 91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0559-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. Benatti , "A Versatile Embedded Platform for EMG Acquisition and Gesture Recognition," in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 620-630, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2476555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Parr, Johnny & Vine, Samuel & Wilson, Mark & Harrison, Neil & Wood, Greg. (2019). Visual attention, EEG alpha power and T7-Fz connectivity are implicated in prosthetic hand control and can be optimized through gaze training. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 16. 10.1186/s12984-019-0524-x.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Meattini, M. Nowak, C. Melchiorri and C. Castellini, "Towards Improving Myocontrol of Prosthetic Hands: A Study on Automated Instability Detection," 2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 2018, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2018.8625021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dosen, S., Markovic, M., Somer, K. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 12, 55 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Markus Nowak 2020 J. Neural Eng. 17 026011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Guidotti, F. Leofante, A. Tacchella and C. Castellini, "Improving Reliability of Myocontrol Using Formal Verification," in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 564-571, April 2019, doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2893152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Cassie N. Borish, Matteo Bertucco, Terence D. Sanger, Effect of target distance on controllability for myocontrol, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 140, 2020, 102432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The Application of EMG and Machine Learning in Human Machine Interface
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              BIC 2022: 2022 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing
              January 2022
              551 pages
              ISBN:9781450395755
              DOI:10.1145/3523286

              Copyright © 2022 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 31 May 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format