skip to main content
10.1145/3524273.3528180acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

3DeformR: freehand 3D model editing in virtual environments considering head movements on mobile headsets

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

3D objects are the primary media in virtual reality environments in immersive cyberspace, also known as the Metaverse. Users, through editing such objects, can communicate with other individuals on mobile headsets. Knowing that the tangible controllers cause the burden to carry such addendum devices, the body-centric interaction techniques, such as hand gestures, get rid of such burdens. However, object editing with hand gestures is usually overlooked. Accordingly, we propose and implement a palm-based virtual embodiment for hand gestural model editing, namely 3DeformR. We employ three optimized hand gestures on bi-harmonic deformation algorithms that enable selecting and editing 3D models in fine granularity. Our evaluation with nine participants considers three interaction techniques (two-handed tangible controller (OMC), a naive implementation of hand gestures (SH), and 3DeformR. Two experimental tasks of planar and spherical objects imply that 3DeformR outperforms SH, in terms of task completion time (~51%) and required actions (~17%). Also, our participants with 3DeformR make significantly better performance than the commercial standard (OMC) - saved task time (~43%) and actions (~3%). Remarkably, the edited objects by 3DeformR show no discernible difference from those with tangible controllers characterised by accurate and responsive detection.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p52-lam.mp4

mp4

10.2 MB

References

  1. Ferran Argelaguet and Carlos Andujar. 2013. A survey of 3D object selection techniques for virtual environments. Computers Graphics 37, 3 (2013), 121--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carlos Bermejo, Lik Hang Lee, Paul Chojecki, David Przewozny, and Pan Hui. 2021. Exploring Button Designs for Mid-Air Interaction in Virtual Reality: A Hexa-Metric Evaluation of Key Representations and Multi-Modal Cues. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, EICS, Article 194 (may 2021), 26 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tara Chittenden. 2018. Tilt Brush painting: Chronotopic adventures in a physicalvirtual threshold. Journal of contemporary painting 4, 2 (2018), 381--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sabine Coquillart. 1990. Extended free-form deformation: A sculpturing tool for 3D geometric modeling. In Proceedings of the 17th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 187--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fabrizio Corda, Jean-Marc Thiery, Marco Livesu, Enrico Puppo, Tamy Boubekeur, and Riccardo Scateni. 2020. Real-Time Deformation with Coupled Cages and Skeletons. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 39. Wiley Online Library, 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jian Cui, Dieter W Fellner, Arjan Kuijper, and Alexei Sourin. 2016. Mid-air gestures for virtual modeling with leap motion. In International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions. Springer, 221--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Henrique Galvan Debarba, Ronan Boulic, Roy Salomon, Olaf Blanke, and Bruno Herbelin. 2018. Self-attribution of distorted reaching movements in immersive virtual reality. Computers & Graphics 76 (2018), 142--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Facebook. 2018. Quill VR illustration and animation tool built to empower artists and creators. https://quill.fb.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Scott Frees, G. Drew Kessler, and Edwin Kay. 2007. PRISM Interaction for Enhancing Control in Immersive Virtual Environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 14, 1 (May 2007), 2--es. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Igor Guskov, Wim Sweldens, and Peter Schröder. 1999. Multiresolution signal processing for meshes. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 325--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, 139--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ammar Hattab and Gabriel Taubin. 2019. Rough Carving of 3D Models with Spatial Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Computational Fabrication (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (SCF '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zhanpeng Huang, Weikai Li, and Pan Hui. 2015. Ubii: Towards Seamless Interaction between Digital and Physical Worlds. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Brisbane, Australia) (MM '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 341--350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alec Jacobson, Ilya Baran, Jovan Popovic, and Olga Sorkine. 2011. Bounded biharmonic weights for real-time deformation. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4 (2011), 78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Alec Jacobson and Daniele Panozzo. 2017. libigl: prototyping geometry processing research in C++. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 courses. 1--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ying Jiang, Congyi Zhang, Hongbo Fu, Alberto Cannavò, Fabrizio Lamberti, Henry Y K Lau, and Wenping Wang. 2021. HandPainter - 3D Sketching in VR with Hand-Based Physical Proxy. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 412, 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pushkar Joshi, Mark Meyer, Tony DeRose, Brian Green, and Tom Sanocki. 2007. Harmonic coordinates for character articulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 26, 3 (2007), 71--es.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jamil Joundi, Yannick Christiaens, Jelle Saldien, Peter Conradie, and Lien De Marez. 2020. An explorative study towards using VR sketching as a tool for ideation and prototyping in product design. In Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, 225--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tao Ju, Scott Schaefer, and Joe Warren. 2005. Mean value coordinates for closed triangular meshes. In ACM Siggraph 2005 Papers. 561--566.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Leif Kobbelt, Swen Campagna, Jens Vorsatz, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 1998. Interactive multi-resolution modeling on arbitrary meshes. In Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kit-Yung Lam, Lik-Hang Lee, and Pan Hui. 2021. A2W: Context-Aware Recommendation System for Mobile Augmented Reality Web Browser. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lik Hang Lee, Tristan Braud, Farshid Hassani Bijarbooneh, and Pan Hui. 2019. TiPoint: Detecting Fingertip for Mid-Air Interaction on Computational Resource Constrained Smartglasses. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers (London, United Kingdom) (ISWC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 118--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lik Hang Lee, Tristan Braud, Farshid Hassani Bijarbooneh, and Pan Hui. 2020. UbiPoint: Towards Non-Intrusive Mid-Air Interaction for Hardware Constrained Smart Glasses. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (Istanbul, Turkey) (MMSys '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 190--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lik-Hang Lee, Tristan Braud, Simo Hosio, and Pan Hui. 2021. Towards Augmented Reality Driven Human-City Interaction: Current Research on Mobile Headsets and Future Challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 8, Article 165 (oct 2021), 38 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lik-Hang Lee, Zijun Lin, Rui Hu, Zhengya Gong, Abhishek Kumar, Tangyao Li, Sijia Li, and Pan Hui. 2021. When Creators Meet the Metaverse: A Survey on Computational Arts. ArXiv abs/2111.13486 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Taehee Lee and Tobias Hollerer. 2007. Handy AR: Markerless inspection of augmented reality objects using fingertip tracking. In 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE, 83--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. John P Lewis, Matt Cordner, and Nickson Fong. 2000. Pose space deformation: a unified approach to shape interpolation and skeleton-driven deformation. In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 165--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ke Lu, Qian Wang, Jian Xue, and Weiguo Pan. 2014. 3D model retrieval and classification by semi-supervised learning with content-based similarity. Information Sciences 281 (2014), 703--713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D. Mendes, F. M. Caputo, A. Giachetti, A. Ferreira, and J. Jorge. 2019. A Survey on 3D Virtual Object Manipulation: From the Desktop to Immersive Virtual Environments. Computer Graphics Forum 38, 1 (2019), 21--45. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13390 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Frol Periverzov and Horea Ilieş. 2015. IDS: The intent driven selection method for natural user interfaces. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Jing Qian, Jiaju Ma, Xiangyu Li, Benjamin Attal, Haoming Lai, James Tompkin, John F Hughes, and Jeff Huang. 2019. Portal-ble: Intuitive free-hand manipulation in unbounded smartphone-based augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 133--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Johanna Schmidt, Reinhold Preiner, Thomas Auzinger, Michael Wimmer, M Eduard Gröller, and Stefan Bruckner. 2014. YMCA---Your mesh comparison application. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). IEEE, 153--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Thomas W Sederberg and Scott R Parry. 1986. Free-form deformation of solid geometric models. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 151--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Leia C Shum, Bulmaro A Valdés, and HF Machiel Van der Loos. 2019. Determining the accuracy of oculus touch controllers for motor rehabilitation applications using quantifiable upper limb kinematics: Validation study. JMIR Biomedical Engineering 4, 1 (2019), e12291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Olga Sorkine, Daniel Cohen-Or, Yaron Lipman, Marc Alexa, Christian Rössl, and H-P Seidel. 2004. Laplacian surface editing. In Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing. 175--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jean-Marc Thiery, Pooran Memari, and Tamy Boubekeur. 2018. Mean value coordinates for quad cages in 3D. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH 2018) (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jose Abel Ticona, Steeven Villa, Rafael Torchelsen, Anderson Maciel, and Luciana Nedel. 2019. Phys-sketch: Sketching 3D dynamic objects in immersive virtual reality. In Computer Graphics International Conference. Springer, 119--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Pier Paolo Valentini. 2018. Natural interface for interactive virtual assembly in augmented reality using leap motion controller. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 12, 4 (2018), 1157--1165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Pier Paolo Valentini and Eugenio Pezzuti. 2017. Accuracy in fingertip tracking using leap motion controller for interactive virtual applications. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 11, 3 (2017), 641--650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Aleš Vysockỳ, Stefan Grushko, Petr Oščádal, Tomáš Kot, Jan Babjak, Rudolf Jánoš, Marek Sukop, and Zdenko Bobovskỳ. 2020. Analysis of Precision and Stability of Hand Tracking with Leap Motion Sensor. Sensors 20, 15 (2020), 4088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Rustin Webster and Joseph F Dues. 2017. System Usability Scale (SUS): Oculus Rift® DK2 and Samsung Gear VR®. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Huiyue Wu, Weizhou Luo, Neng Pan, Shenghuan Nan, Yanyi Deng, Shengqian Fu, and Liuqingqing Yang. 2019. Understanding freehand gestures: a study of freehand gestural interaction for immersive VR shopping applications. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences 9, 1 (2019), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Xiaokun Wu, Daniel Finnegan, Eamonn O'Neill, and Yong-Liang Yang. 2018. Handmap: Robust hand pose estimation via intermediate dense guidance map supervision. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 237--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jie Yang, Lin Gao, Yu-Kun Lai, Paul L Rosin, and Shihong Xia. 2018. Biharmonic deformation transfer with automatic key point selection. Graphical Models 98 (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Yui-Pan Yau, Lik Hang Lee, Zheng Li, Tristan Braud, Yi-Hsuan Ho, and Pan Hui. 2020. How Subtle Can It Get? A Trimodal Study of Ring-Sized Interfaces for One-Handed Drone Control. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 2, Article 63 (June 2020), 29 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Zongliang Zhanga, Jonathan Lia, Xin Lic, Yangbin Lina, Shanxin Zhanga, and Cheng Wanga. 2016. A fast method for measuring the similarity between 3d model and 3d point cloud. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. 3DeformR: freehand 3D model editing in virtual environments considering head movements on mobile headsets

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MMSys '22: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference
          June 2022
          432 pages
          ISBN:9781450392839
          DOI:10.1145/3524273

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 August 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate176of530submissions,33%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader