Jining Han
ABSTRACT
HyFlex learning incorporates online and in classroom teaching synchronously. Through a case study, the present study investigates students’ responses to a HyFlex course and provides suggestions for improving the design and implementation of HyFlex courses. In the case study, eighteen students completed a semester-long web programming course implemented in HyFlex learning environments. Synthesizing multiple types of qualitative data, this study finds that the flexibility of HyFlex learning mode can satisfy students’ various needs. It also examines the advantages of the HyFlex learning: improving participation and equity. However, successful HyFlex learning also needs to face challenges on technology and how students deal with technical issues. In addition, teaching contexts also need to be considered in the design and implementation of HyFlex courses.
- A. Raes, L. Detienne, I. Windey, and F. Depaepe, “A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 269–290, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. M. M. Abdelmalak and J. L. Parra, “Expanding Learning Opportunities for Graduate Students with HyFlex Course Design,” Int. J. Online Pedagog. Course Des., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 19–37, 2016, doi: 10.4018/IJOPCD.2016100102.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Zydney, Z. Warner, and L. Angelone, “Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments,” Comput. Educ., vol. 143, p. 103678, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Raes, P. Vanneste, M. Pieters, I. Windey, W. Van Den Noortgate, and F. Depaepe, “Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes,” Comput. Educ., vol. 143, p. 103682, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. T. Butz and R. H. Stupnisky, “Improving student relatedness through an online discussion intervention: The application of self-determination theory in synchronous hybrid programs,” Comput. Educ., vol. 114, pp. 117–138, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.006.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hastie, I. Hung, N. Chen, and Kinshuk, “A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 9–24, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1080/14703290903525812.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Lakhal, D. Bateman, and J. Bédard, “Blended Synchronous Delivery Modes in Graduate Programs: A Literature Review and How it is Implemented in the Master Teacher Program,” Collect. Essays Learn. Teach., vol. 10, p. 47, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. R. Carmel Parker White Jessica G. Smith and Lisa Plonowski, “Simultaneous Delivery of a Face-to-Face Course to On-Campus and Remote Off-Campus Students,” TechTrends, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 34–40, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11528-010-0418-z.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. T. Butz and M. K. Askim-Lovseth, “Oral communication skills assessment in a synchronous hybrid MBA programme: does attending face-to-face matter for US and international students?,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 624–639, May 2015, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.940577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- U. Cunningham, “Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 15, no. 6, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1793.Google Scholar
- G. L. W. P.E. and T. R. Ball, “The Converged Classroom.” ASEE Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, doi: 10.18260/1-2–22561.Google Scholar
- J. Bell, S. Sawaya, and W. Cain, “Synchromodal Classes: Designing for Shared Learning Experiences Between Face-to-Face and Online Students,” Int. J. Des. Learn., vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/209656.Google Scholar
- M. Bower, B. Dalgarno, G. E. Kennedy, M. J. W. Lee, and J. Kenney, “Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis,” Comput. Educ., vol. 86, pp. 1–17, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Huang, C. Zhao, F. Shu, and J. Huang, “Investigating and Analyzing Teaching Effect of Blended Synchronous Classroom,” in 2017 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), 2017, pp. 134–135, doi: 10.1109/EITT.2017.40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. A. Olt, “Virtually There: Distant Freshmen Blended in Classes through Synchronous Online Education,” Innov. High. Educ., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 381–395, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10755-018-9437-z.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. M. Zydney, P. McKimmy, R. Lindberg, and M. Schmidt, “Here or There Instruction: Lessons Learned in Implementing Innovative Approaches to Blended Synchronous Learning,” TechTrends, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 123–132, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Badia, C. Garcia, and J. Meneses, “Emotions in response to teaching online: Exploring the factors influencing teachers in a fully online university,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 446–457, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2018.1546608.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Kyei-Blankson, F. Godwyll, and M. Nur-Awaleh, “Innovative blended delivery and learning: Exploring student choice, experience, and level of satisfaction in a hyflex course,” Int. J. Innov. Learn., vol. 16, p. 243, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1504/IJIL.2014.064728.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Stefanic, R. K. Campbell, J. S. Russ, and E. Stefanic, “Evaluation of a blended learning approach for cross-cultural entrepreneurial education,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 242–254, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2019.1568901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- “Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook: By Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994. 338 pp. £19.95 paperback. ISBN 0 8039 5540 5.,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 336–337, 1994, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80231-2.Google Scholar
- T. Hollweck, “Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 282 pages.,” Can. J. Progr. Eval., Mar. 2016, doi: 10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108.Google Scholar
- N. T. Butz and R. H. Stupnisky, “A mixed methods study of graduate students’ self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 28, pp. 85–95, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Balakrishnan, “Predicting Student Retention in Massive Open Online Courses using Hidden Markov Models,” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2013/EECS-2013-109.html.Google Scholar
- M. Krause and J. Williams, A Playful Game Changer: Fostering Student Retention in Online Education with Social Gamification. 2015.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. E. Nieuwoudt, “Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 15–25, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.14742/ajet.5137.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. S. Anastasiades , “Interactive Videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece,” Comput. Educ., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 321–339, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Willems, H. Farley, and C. Campbell, “The increasing significance of digital equity in higher education: An introduction to the Digital Equity Special Issue,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 35, no. 6 SE-Editorial, pp. 1–8, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.14742/ajet.5996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Liu, J. Spector, and M. Ikle, “Computer technologies for model‐based collaborative learning: A research‐based approach with initial findings,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1002/cae.22049.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Students’ Responses to a HyFlex Course: A Case Study in the Educational Technology Setting
Recommendations
A Case Study of Pupils' Scaffolding Learning Experience Supported by Information Technology
ICDEL '19: Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Distance Education and LearningScaffolding teaching method is a learner-centered teaching method based on constructivism, aiming at cultivating students' problem-solving ability and autonomous learning ability. Lots of researches have studied scaffolding concerning subjects of ...
Monitoring students' goal setting and metacognitive knowledge in technology-enhanced learning with metacognitive prompts
The purpose of this study is to analyse individual students' goal setting and metacognitive knowledge using the learning platform developed for the ''Electricity in Our Lives'' unit. A descriptive case study was applied in this work. The participants ...
Expanding Learning Opportunities for Graduate Students with HyFlex Course Design
The purpose of this study was to explore students' perspectives regarding HyFlex course design. The main feature of HyFlex is blending synchronous online student attendance and face-to-face student attendance hybrid in a single course and allowing ...
Comments