skip to main content
10.1145/3524383.3524409acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The Stress Recovery Effect of Virtual Reality Natural Scene with Different Immersion on Knowledge Talents

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This experiment explores the restorative effect of VR natural scenes with different immersion on different stress states. We use the experimental method, the restorative natural scene provided by VR head display device (HMD) was used to study different pressure groups through two variables 2 (pressure: high and low)×2 (immersion: high, low) inter group design, based on the analysis of experimental data, this paper discusses the differences between subjective indexes (stress awareness, positive emotion, negative emotion, perceptual recovery) and objective indexes (diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, attention) after watching the natural environment intervention provided by VR HMD. The results showed that among the seven pairs of dependent variables related to stress, there were significant differences in five pairs (pressure value, negative emotion, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and attention time), and the value of perceptual recovery scale (PRS=11.746±8.892) was positive. For the difference of 8 pressure indicators, 2 (pressure: high, low) ×2 (immersion: high, low) two-way ANOVA showed that the effect of stress factor was significant or marginal significant on the three indexes (F pressure difference (1,66) = 15.946, P < 0.001; F negative emotion difference (1, 66) =0.338, P = 0.080; FPRS (1,66) = 5.552, P = 0.022), and other indexes were not significant. The post test found that the average value of the three groups of data was that the high-pressure group was greater than the low-pressure group, and the pressure difference in the high-pressure group (M= 7.3939, SD =4.993) was higher than that in the low-pressure group (M=2.2647, SD=5.362); The negative emotion difference in the high-pressure group (M=0.5000, SD=3.250) was higher than that in the low-pressure group (M=2.0303, SD=4.297);The PRS value of high-pressure group (M=14.2727, SD=8.232) was higher than that of low-pressure group (M=9.2941, SD=8.936). Therefore, the conclusion of this experiment is that the restorative natural scene provided by VR HMD has the effect of relaxation and decompression. Stress factors have a significant impact on the decompression effect. The subjective decompression effect of high-pressure group is more obvious than that of low-pressure group, and the objective index is not significant. VR immersion has no significant effect on the relief of stress symptoms. The experimental results suggest that the VR scene design with the goal of relaxation and decompression can more consider the use of restorative natural scenes to improve the user experience. The design of virtual reality scene does not need to blindly pursue immersion.

References

  1. Kaplan S. The restorative environment: Nature and human experience[M]. Timber Press. one thousand nine hundred and ninety-twoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ulrich R.S., Simons R.F., Losito B.D., Fiorito E., Miles M.A., Zelson M., Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments[J]. Environ Psychol. 1991,11(3):201–230. 1991,11(3):201–230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jung D.W., D.G. Yeom, G.W. Kim and B.J. Park. 2015. Physiological and psychological relaxing effects of viewing the scenery in the Jangseong Healing Forest. J. Korean Soc. People Plants Environ. 18(5):429-435.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lee J.W., P.S. Yeon, S.H. Park, and J.W. Kang. 2018. Effects of forest therapy programs on the stress and emotional change of emotional labor workers. J. Korean Inst. For. Recreat. 22(3):15-22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and Natural Environments (pp. 85–125). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Zhang Zhen & Xu Leiqing (2020). The healing benefits of virtual nature and its application trend Southern architecture (04), 34-40 Doi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu Xiaolan, Zhang Kan, Chen Xuefeng, Chen Zhiyan, mental health Blue Book: China national mental health development report (2017-2018), social science literature press, 201997875, 20138970Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaaya M, Osman H, Naassan G, Validation of the Arabic version of the Cohen Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) among pregnant and postpartum women[J]. BMC Psychiatry,2010,10:111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hyunju Jo, Chorong Song & Yoshifumi Miyazaki. (2019). Physiological Benefits of Viewing Nature: A Systematic Review of Indoor Experiments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health(23), doi:10.3390/ijerph16234739.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andreou E, Alexopoulos EC, Lionis C, Perceived Stress Scale: reliability and validity study in Greece[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2011,8(8):3287-3298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang TingZhong, Huang hanteng Epidemiological study on psychological stress of urban residents in social transformation [J] Chinese Journal of epidemiology, 2003,24 (9): 760-764Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu Lijuan, Gao Shangren The impact of stress perception on negative mental health: the effects of meditation experience and emotional intelligence regulation [J] Chinese Journal of psychology, 2005,47 (2): 157-179Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang Xinxin, Wu Chengzhao & Yan Jun (2019). An experimental study on the Chinese version of perceptual recovery scale (PRS) in the evaluation of urban park recoverability Chinese gardens (02), 45-48 Doi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang Li, Yang TingZhong, Ji Zhongmin (2003). Study on the applicability of positive and negative emotion scale in Chinese population Chinese Journal of mental health (01), 54-56 doi:CNKI:SUN:ZXWS. 0.2003-01-017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004; 43(Pt. 3):245–265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jingqi Li, Jiamin Shen, Shiqin Liu, Maelig Chauvel, Wenwei Yang, Jian Mei, Ling Lei, Li Wu, Jian Gao, YongYang. Responses of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness to Habit Stimulation: A Quantitative EEG Study[J]. Neuroscience Bulletin,2018,34(04):691-699.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang Pai, LV Yuanjie, Wang Mei. An environmental control system based on smart phone and brain computer interface technology[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of science and technology, 2015, 35 (5): 656-661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Min ZHANG, Zhenyu WANG, Hong lin HU. A new SSVEP-based BCI utilizing frequency and space to encode visual targets[J/OL]. Science China(Information Sciences):1-3 [2020-06-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5847.TP.20200415.1555.008.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang ningjian, Wu Mingzheng, GaoXucheng. Research method of implicit social cognition based on response time paradigm[J]. Psychological science, 2003 (2): 208-211Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Parsons, R. Daniel, T.C., 2002. Good looking: In defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60, 43–56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Völker, S., Kistemann, T., 2015. Developing the urban blue: Comparative health responses to blue and green urban open spaces in Germany. Health and Place, 35, 196–205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jiang, B., Larsen, L., Deal, B., Sullivan., W.C., 2015. A dose–response curve describing the relationship between tree cover density and landscape preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 139, 16–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Graves, R.A., Pearson, S.M., Turner, M.G., 2017. Species richness alone does not predict cultural ecosystem service value. Proceedings of the national academy of science of United States, 114, 3774–3779.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hoyle, H., Hitchmough, J., Jorgensen, A., 2017. All about the 'wow factor'? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 109–123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., Depledge, M., 2010. Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 482–493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Relf, D., McDaniel, A.R., Butterfield, B., 1992. Attitudes toward Plants and Gardening. HortTechnology, 2, 201–204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wang, R., Zhao, J., Meitner M.J., 2017. Urban woodland understory characteristics in relation to aesthetic and recreational preference. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 24, 55–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, J., Park, B.-J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Ohira, T., Kagawa, T., Miyazaki, Y., 2011. Effect of forest bathing on physiological and psychological responses in young Japanese male subjects. Public Health 125 (2), 93–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Song, C., Ikei, H., Kobayashi, M., Miura, T., Li, Q., Kagawa, T., , 2017. Effects of viewing forest landscape on middle-aged hypertensive men. Urban For. Urban Green. 21, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Ulrich, R.S., 1981. Natural versus urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ. Behav. 13 (5), 523–556Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Fan Dongmei (2019). Design and implementation of psychological relaxation system based on VR technology Overseas Chinese garden (07), 124 doi:CNKI:SUN:QYZZ. 0.2019-07-098.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yao Lingyu & Li Jing (2016). Virtual reality technology and its application in clinical psychology Psychological technology and application (12), 763-768 doi:10.16842/j.cnki. issn2095-5588.2016.12.007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBDE '22: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data and Education
    February 2022
    465 pages
    ISBN:9781450395793
    DOI:10.1145/3524383

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format