skip to main content
10.1145/3524458.3547227acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgooditConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Block by block – How Immutable Ledgers Drive Sustainability Efforts: An organizing literature review on the capabilities of the blockchain technology in supply chains

Published:07 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Distributed ledger technology (DLT) like blockchain technology (BCT) is expected to have the power to improve sustainability in supply chains. To summarize and organize the insights of research in information systems (IS) on how BCT relates to transparency and, ultimately, sustainability of supply chains, this paper conducts a structured literature review. In total 46 articles have been identified and analyzed. The analysis shows that the potential of BCT to facilitate transparency in supply chains and thus enable sustainability measures stems from its decentralized and distributed nature. Further, BCT does not unfold this potential on its own; rather it is a technology that complements existing IS used to manage inter-organizational transactions. Overall, the paper contributes to the literature by providing a deeper insight into the possibilities, features, and merits of BCT in the SCM context, mainly focusing on transparency and sustainability matters. Summarizing and organizing the advantages of BCT and the shortcomings of existing IS used in SCM as discussed in prior research, this paper emphasizes that BCT needs to be considered as a complementary technology. Viewing BCT as such and implementing at such, BCT has great potential to support sustainability efforts significantly.

References

  1. George, J. J. and Whitten, G. D. Blockchain in the Role of Emancipatory Technology. Americas Conference on Information Systems (2020), 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wallbach, S., Lehner, R., Roethke, K., Elbert, R. and Benlian, A. Trust-Building Effects of Blockchain Features — An Empirical Analysis of Immutability, Traceability and Anonymity. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (Virtual, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Zavolokina, L., Spychiger, F., Tessone, C. J. and Schwabe, G. Incentivizing Data Quality in Blockchains for Inter-Organizational Networks - Learning from the Digital Car Dossier. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (San Francisco, USA, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yew, M. H., Kurnia, S., Molla, A., Ali, M., Ramayah, T. and Rahim, M. Exploring Blockchain for Sustainability in the Food Supply Chain: An Affordance Approach. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Dubai, UAE, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. European, U. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014. City, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Federal Ministry for Economic and Development. Fragen und Antworten zum Lieferkettengesetz (2021), 1-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jahanbin, P., Wingreen, S. and Sharma, R. Blockchain and IoT integration for Trust Improvement in Agricultural Supply Chain. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh European Conference on Information Systems, Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden (Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden, 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Medaglia, R. and Damsgaard, J. Blockchain and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: Towards an Agenda for IS Research. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Dubai, UAE, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sharma, R. S., Wingreen, S., Kshetri, N. and Hewa, T. M. Design principles for use cases of blockchain in food supply chains. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (Cancun, Mexico, 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Schulte, M., Balasubramanian, S. and Paris, C. M. Blood Diamonds and Ethical Consumerism: An Empirical Investigation. Sustainability, 13, 8 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck, R., Kildetoft, M. B. and Radonic, N. Using Blockchain to Sustainably Manage Containers in International Shipping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Hyderabad, India, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Delliere, É. and Grange, C. Understanding and Measuring the Ecological Sustainability of the Blockchain Technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (San Francisco, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sarker, S., Henningsson, S., Jensen, T. and Hedman, J. The Use Of Blockchain As A Resource For Combating Corruption In Global Shipping: An Interpretive Case Study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38, 2 (2021), 338-373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Roeck, D. The Foundation of Distributed Ledger Technology for Supply Chain Management. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Appiah Otoo, B. A. and Singh, R. The Mediating Role of Blockchain Competencies on the Information Sharing and Supply Chain Performance Link. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kwon, I.-W. G. and Suh, T. Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40, 2 (2004), 4-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakasumi, M. Information Sharing for Supply Chain Management based on Block Chain Technology. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Brundtland, G. H. Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environmental Conservation, 14, 4 (1987), 291-294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N. and Rockström, J. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature sustainability, 2, 9 (2019), 805-814.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Awaysheh, A. and Klassen, R. D. The Impact of Supply Chain Structure on the Use of Supplier Socially Responsible Practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30, 12 (2010), 1246-1268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Francisco, K. and Swanson, D. The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency. Logistics, 2, 1 (2018), 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Blossey, G., Eisenhardt, J. and Hahn, G. J. Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management: An Application Perspective. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019), 6885-6893.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nærland, C., Müller-Bloch, C., Beck, R. and Palmund, S. Blockchain to Rule the Waves - Nascent Design Principles for Reducing Risk and Uncertainty in Decentralized Environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Seoul, South Korea, 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tse, D., Zhang, B., Yang, Y., Cheng, C. and Mu, H. Blockchain Application in Food Supply Information Security. In Proceedings of the Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (Singapore, 2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Tian, F. An information System for Food Safety Monitoring in Supply Chains based on HACCP, Blockchain and Internet of Things. Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen, S., Shi, R., Ren, Z., Yan, J. S. Y. and Zhang, J. A Blockchain-based Supply Chain Quality Management Framework. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (Shanghai, China, 2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jensen, T. and Tan, Y.-H. Key Design Properties for Shipping Information Pipeline. In Proceedings of the Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolb, J., Becker, L., Fischer, M. and Winkelmann, A. The Role of Blockchain in Enterprise Procurement. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Riasanow, T., Burckhardt, F., Setzke, D. S., Böhm, M. and Krcmar, H. The Generic Blockchain Ecosystem and its Strategic Implications. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (New Orleans, USA, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Avital, M., Beck, R., King, J. L. and Rossi, M. Jumping on the Blockchain Bandwagon: Lessons of the Past and Outlook to the Future. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Dublin, Ireland, 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Glaser, F. Pervasive Decentralisation of Digital Infrastructures: A Framework for Blockchain enabled System and Use Case Analysis. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sternberg, H. and Baruffaldi, G. Chains in Chains – Logic and Challenges of Blockchains in Supply Chains. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Scholz, T. M. and Stein, V. The Architecture of Blockchain Organization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (San Francisco, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Eigelshoven, F., Ullrich, A. and Bender, B. Public Blockchain - A Systematic Literature Review on the Sustainability of Consensus Algorithms. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (Virtual, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Walsh, C., O'Reilly, P., Gleasure, R., Feller, J., Li, S. and Cristoforo, J. New kid on the block: a strategic archetypes approach to understanding the Blockchain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Dublin, Ireland, 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Webster, J. and Watson, R. T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly (2002), xiii-xxiii.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Leidner, D. E. Review and theory symbiosis: An introspective retrospective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 6 (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kannengiesser, N., Lins, S. and Sunyaev, A. Uncertainties toward Permissioned Distributed Ledgers: A Multi-Actor Uncertainty Conceptualization. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eigth European Conference on Information Systems, Marrakesh, Marocco (Marrakesh, Marocco, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Labazova, O. Towards a Framework for Evaluation of Blockchain Implementations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Munich, Germany, 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Schlecht, L., Schneider, S. and Buchwald, A. Creating value through blockchain technology: A Delphi study. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (Marrakesh, Morocco, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang, X. How Will Blockchain Change the Market Structure? In Proceedings of the Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems (San Francisco, USA, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Beck, R., Mueller-Bloch, C. and King, J. L. Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 10 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wüst, K. and Gervais, A. Do you need a Blockchain? In Proceedings of the Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT). IEEE (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Ostern, N. K., Rosemann, M. and Moormann, J. Determining the Idiosyncrasy of Blockchain: An Affordances Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Hyderabad, India, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Seebacher, S. and Schüritz, R. Blockchain - Just Another IT Implementation? A Comparison of Blockchain and Interorganizational Information Systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden, 2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z. and Papamanthou, C. Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2016), 839-858.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Pytel, N., Hofmanm, A. and Winkelmann, A. Tracing Back the Value Stream with Colored Coins. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (Seoul, South Korea, 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Quayson, M., Bai, C. and Sarkis, J. Technology for Social Good Foundations: A Perspective From the Smallholder Farmer in Sustainable Supply Chains. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 3 (2021), 894-898.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Rossi, M., Mueller-Bloch, C., Thatcher, J. B. and Beck, R. Blockchain Research in Information Systems: Current Trends and an Inclusive Future Research Agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 9 (2019), 1390-1405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Liang, H., Sun, L. and Teo, M. Greenwashing: Evidence from hedge funds (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Block by block – How Immutable Ledgers Drive Sustainability Efforts: An organizing literature review on the capabilities of the blockchain technology in supply chains

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GoodIT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good
      September 2022
      436 pages
      ISBN:9781450392846
      DOI:10.1145/3524458

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 September 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Upcoming Conference

      GoodIT '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format