skip to main content
10.1145/3527188.3561916acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effect of repetitive motion intervention on self-avatar on the sense of self-individuality

Published:05 December 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the human Digital Twin has been discussed as new technology. When we discuss a world in which one’s self-avatar autonomously performs social activities in cyberspace, the questions arise whether or not the behavior of the avatars feels like one’s own, and whether or not we can approve of the self-avatars’ social activities on behalf of ourselves. We define such feeling as the sense of self-individuality. In this study, we focused on the situation in which self-avatars perform presentations on behalf of ourselves to investigate the effect of the modification experience on the presentation motions by self-avatars on the sense of self-individuality. We conducted VR-based experiments in which the motion modification intervention was performed on self-avatars over eight weeks by 24 experiment participants. As a result, we found that the sense of self-individuality was improved as the number of modifications and interventions increased. However, we found that the intensity of motion modification did not correlate with the improvement of the sense of self-individuality in this experiment condition. We also found that the sense of self-individuality was reduced when others intervened in the motion. From these results, we clarified that the experience of motion modification on self-avatars is significant when designing the behavior of avatars acting on behalf of ourselves in human Digital Twin. Further investigation is required to clarify the effect of the long-term intervention on behavior to distinguish between the mere exposure effect.

References

  1. A. Aly and A. Tapas. 2013. A model for synthesizing a combined verbal and nonverbal behavior based on personality traits in human-robot interaction. In Proc. of 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (2013), 325–332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Namrata Bagaria, Fedwa Laamarti, Hawazin Faiz Badawi, Amani Albraikan, Roberto Alejandro Martinez Velazquez, and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2020. Health 4.0: Digital Twins for Health and Well-Being. In Connected Health in Smart Cities, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik, M Shamim Hossain, and Burak Kantarci (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 143–152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Cerekovic, O. Aran, and D. Gatica-Perez. 2014. How do you like your virtual agent?: Human-agent interaction experience through nonverbal features and personality traits. In Proc. of International Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding (2014), 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tetsunari Inamura and Yoshiaki Mizuchi. 2021. SIGVerse: A Cloud-Based VR Platform for Research on Multimodal Human-Robot Interaction. Frontiers in robotics and AI 8 (2021), 549360. https://doi.org/10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tatsuya Ishino, Mitsuhiro Goto, and Akihiro Kashihara. 2018. A Robot for Reconstructing Presentation Behavior in Lecture. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction(HAI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, 67–75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Johannes Maria Kraus, Florian Nothdurft, Philipp Hock, David Scholz, Wolfgang Minker, and Martin Baumann. 2016. Human After All: Effects of Mere Presence and Social Interaction of a Humanoid Robot as a Co-Driver in Automated Driving. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 129–134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. M. Lee, W. Peng, S.-A Jin, and C. Yan. 2006. Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication 56, 4 (2006), 754–772.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. McRorie, I. Sneddon, G. McKeown, E. Bevacqua, E. de Sevin, and C. Pelachaud. 2021. Evaluation of four designed virtual agent personalities. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING 3, 3 (2021), 311–322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sang-Min Park and Young-Gab Kim. 2022. A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges. IEEE Access 10(2022), 4209–4251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. C. Pelachaud. 2009. Studies on gesture expressivity for a virtual agent. Speech Commun. 51, 7 (2009), 630–639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wei Shengli. 2021. Is Human Digital Twin possible?Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update 1 (2021), 100014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Akihito Shimazu, Chie Hieida, Takayuki Nagai, Tomoaki Nakamura, Yuki Takeda, Takenori Hara, Osamu Nakagawa, and Tsuyoshi Maeda. 2018. Generation of Gestures During Presentation for Humanoid Robots. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 961–968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Takayama, M. Goto, S. Eitoku, R. Ishii, H. Noto, S. Ozawa, and T. Nakamura. 2021. How People Distinguish Individuals from their Movements: Toward the Realization of Personalized Agents. In Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction(HAI ’21) (2021), 66–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. H Trinh, R Asadi, D Edge, and T Bickmore. 2017. RoboCOP: A Robotic Coach for Oral Presentations. In Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 1. 27:1–27:24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Stan van Ginkel, Judith Gulikers, Harm Biemans, Omid Noroozi, Mila Roozen, Tom Bos, Richard van Tilborg, Melanie van Halteren, and Martin Mulder. 2019. Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback. Comput. Educ. 134(2019), 78–97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Robert B Zajonc. 1968. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 9, 2, Pt.2 (1968), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effect of repetitive motion intervention on self-avatar on the sense of self-individuality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        HAI '22: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
        December 2022
        352 pages
        ISBN:9781450393232
        DOI:10.1145/3527188

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 December 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format