skip to main content
10.1145/3527927.3535207acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

The Non-myth of the Noble Red: Exploring Brechtian Principles of Storytelling and Performance in the Authoring of a Tangible Narrative

Published:20 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

World-building is among the most relevant and challenging aspects of authoring an interactive digital narrative. These challenges can even be more significant when designing tangible interactive narratives. The author must define how and when to express the material aspects of the narrative in the real world and how artefacts can support this storytelling process. This poster introduces the creative process of world-building a tangible interactive narrative: The Non-myth of the Noble Red. In this tangible narrative, world-building is based on a Brechtian approach to explore ways in which closing the gap between performance and space can involve the user into a more active role while becoming conscious of the social implications presented in the narrative. Reaching out to principles and concepts brought from theatre and other forms of performative arts places the performative component and discourse of the narrative in the foreground of the experience. This approach can be used to identify considerations that are usually ignored in mainstream interactive experiences by prioritizing the narrative's critical discourse and exploring more artistic and experimental approaches to storytelling.

References

  1. Augusto Boal. 2003. From the Theatre of the Oppressed. In The New Media Reader, Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Nick Montfort (eds.). MIT Press, Boston, MA, US, 341–352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Torie Bosch. 2012. Sci-Fi Writer Bruce Sterling Explains the Intriguing New Concept of Design Fiction. Slate. Retrieved January 15, 2022 from https://slate.com/technology/2012/03/bruce-sterling-on-design-fictions.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertolt Brecht. 2019. Brecht on theatre. Bloomsbury Academic, London ; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Daniel Joseph Dunne. 2014. Brechtian Alienation in Videogames. Press Start 1, 1 (November 2014), 79–99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel Echeverri and Huaxin Wei. 2020. Letters to José: A Design Case for Building Tangible Interactive Narratives. In Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2020 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Springer, Cham, Bournemouth, UK, 15–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62516-0_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Daniel Echeverri and Huaxin Wei. 2022. Exploring the Experience with Tangible Interactive Narrative: Authoring and Evaluation of Letters to José. Entertainment Computing Journal (forthcoming 2022), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Stefan Ekman and Audrey Isabel Taylor. 2016. Notes Toward a Critical Approach to Worlds and World-Building. Fafnir – Nordic Journal of Science Fiction and Fantasy Research 3, 3 (2016), 7–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaz Evans. 2014. The Brechtian, Absurdist, and Poor Video Game: Alternative Theatrical Models of Software-based Experience. Journal of Games Criticism 1, 2 (June 2014), 1–22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. U. A. Fanthorpe. 1986. Not My Best Side. In Selected Poems. Penguin Books, London, UK, 28–29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Josette Feral and Ron Bermingham. 1987. Alienation Theory in Multi-Media Performance. Theatre Journal 39, 4 (December 1987), 461. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3208248Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Clara Fernández-Vara. 2009. Play's the Thing: A Framework to Study Videogames as Performance. In 2009 DiGRA International Conference: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, Digital Games Research Association, 2009 DiGRA, 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gonzalo Frasca. 2001. Rethinking agency and immersion: video games as a means of consciousness-raising. Digital Creativity 12, 3 (September 2001), 167–174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1076/digc.12.3.167.3225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Melanie Green and John K. Donahue. 2014. Simulated Worlds: Transportation Into Narratives. In Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation, Keith D. Markman, William M. Klein and Julie A. Suhr (eds.). Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, USA, 241–256. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809846.ch16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Saumya Gupta and Joshua Tanenbaum. 2019. Shiva's Rangoli: Tangible Interactive Storytelling in Ambient Environments. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion - DIS ’19 Companion, ACM Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 29–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3325145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wassily Kandinsky. 2008. Concerning the spiritual in art. The Floating Press, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved January 8, 2022 from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=313508Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wassily Kandinsky and Hilla Rebay. 1979. Point and line to plane. Dover Publications, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Brenda Laurel. 2013. Computers as Theatre (Second Edition ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston, MA, US.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ali Mazalek, Michael Nitsche, Sanjay Chandrasekharan, Tim Welsh, Paul Clifton, Andrew Quitmeyer, Firaz Peer, and Friedrich Kirschner. 2010. Recognizing self in puppet controlled virtual avatars. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games - Fun and Games ’10, ACM Press, Leuven, Belgium, 66–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823825Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alex Mitchell. 2016. Making the Familiar Unfamiliar: Techniques for Creating Poetic Gameplay. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG, Digital Games Research Association and Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games, Dundee, Scotland, 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hye Yeon Nam and Michael Nitsche. 2013. Interactive installations as performance: inspiration for HCI. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction - TEI ’14, ACM Press, Munich, Germany, 189–196. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540976Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Willie van Peer, J. Hakemulder, and S. Zyngier. 2007. Lines on feeling: foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature 16, 2 (May 2007), 197–213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075985Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Holger Pötzsch. 2017. Playing Games with Shklovsky, Brecht, and Boal: Ostranenie, V-Effect, and Spect-Actors as Analytical Tools for Game Studies. Game Studies 17, 2 (December 2017). Retrieved December 22, 2021 from http://gamestudies.org/1702/articles/potzschGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marie-Laure Ryan. 2015. Texts, Worlds, Stories Narrative Worlds as Cognitive and Ontological Concept. In Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media: Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds (1st ed.), Mari Hatavara, Matti Hyvärinen, Maria Mäkelä and Frans Mäyrä (eds.). Routledge, 11–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722313Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Marie-Laure Ryan. 2017. The Aesthetics of Proliferation. In World Building: Transmedia, Fans, Industries. Amsterdam University Press, 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mose Sakashita, Tatsuya Minagawa, Amy Koike, Ippei Suzuki, Keisuke Kawahara, and Yoichi Ochiai. 2017. You as a Puppet: Evaluation of Telepresence User Interface for Puppetry. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, Québec City QC Canada, 217–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jennifer G. Sheridan and Nick Bryan Kinns. 2008. Designing for performative tangible interaction. IJART 1, 3/4 (2008), 288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2008.022364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Joshua Tanenbaum, Karen Tanenbaum, and Alissa Antle. 2010. The Reading Glove: Designing Interactions for Object-based Tangible Storytelling. In Proceedings of the 1st Augmented Human International Conference, ACM, Megève, France, 9. Retrieved October 7, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1785474Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Brygg Ullmer, Hiroshi Ishii, and Robert JK Jacob. 2005. Token Constraint Systems for Tangible Interaction with Digital Information. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 12, 1 (March 2005), 81–118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Mikael Wiberg, Hiroshi Ishii, Paul Dourish, Anna Vallgårda, Tobie Kerridge, Petra Sundström, Daniela Rosner, and Mark Rolston. 2013. Materiality matters—experience materials. interactions 20, 2 (March 2013), 54–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2427076.2427087Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Lars de Wildt. 2014. Enstranging Play: Distinguishing Playful Subjecthood from Governance. In Proceedings of the Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2014, Istanbul, Turkey, 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Mark J. P. Wolf. 2013. Building imaginary worlds: the theory and history of subcreation. Routledge, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    C&C '22: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Creativity and Cognition
    June 2022
    710 pages
    ISBN:9781450393270
    DOI:10.1145/3527927

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 June 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format