skip to main content
10.1145/3528575.3551438acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Adoption of Green IT Behaviours: A Perceived Knowledge Effect on Responsible Digital Practices?

Published:28 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Green IT approach aims to reduce the environmental, social and economic impact of digital technology. A possible lever for change can be to study factors that encourage individuals to adopt pro-Green IT behaviours. However, few studies have explored these factors, especially the influence of perceived knowledge. To fill this gap, this study examines the relationship between perceived knowledge of Green IT, attitude and intention towards adopting specific Green IT behaviours. The study includes 143 participants, who completed an online survey and answered various questions on Green IT (e.g., on perceived knowledge, attitude, intention to adopt behaviours). The results of the study reveal that the more perceived knowledge of Green IT the participants had, the more positive their attitude towards Green IT and the greater their intention to adopt Green IT behaviours. This study paves the way for public policies promoting knowledge on Green IT and digital responsible technologies.

References

  1. Sadguru Prakash and Seema Srivastava. 2019. Impact of climate change on biodiversity: an overview. International Journal of Biological Innovations, 2 (Dec. 2019), 60-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46505/IJBI.2019.1205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jannis Kallinikos, Aleksi Aaltonen, and Attila Marton, 2013. The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. Mis Q, 2 (June 2013), 357–370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney Tan, Shan L. Pan, and Meiyun Zuo. 2011. Attaining and enacting green leadership: insights from the Green IT initiatives of China mobile. In Proceedings 32th ICIS, December 4-7, 2011, Shanghai, China. AIS Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, 1-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin K. Sovacool. 2014. Diversity: Energy studies need social science. Nature, 7511 (Jul 2014), 529–530. DOI: 10.1038/511529a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Vanessa Theis and Dusan Schreiber. 2021. State-of-the-art of scientific production about green information technology. Gest. Prod, 4 (2021), e5557. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9649-2021v28e5557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Shahla Asadi, Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, Sarminah Samad, Parveen F. Rupani, Hesam Kamyab, and Rusli Abdullah. 2021. A proposed adoption model for green IT in manufacturing industries. J. Clean. Prod., (May 2021), 126629. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Adedapo O. Ojo, Murali Raman, and Alan G. Downe. 2019. Toward green computing practices: A Malaysian study of green belief and attitude among Information Technology professionals. J. Clean. Prod., (Jul. 2019), 246-255. DOI: https://10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.237Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Adedapo. O. Ojo and Muhammad A. Fauzi. 2020. Environmental awareness and leadership commitment as determinants of IT professionals engagement in Green IT practices for environmental performance. Sustain. Prod. Consum, (Oct 2020), 298–307. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Adedapo O. Ojo. 2021. Motivational factors of pro-environmental behaviors among information technology professionals. Rev Manag Sci, (Oct. 2021), 1-24. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-683468/v1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mayuri Patel. 2017. Green ICT: a study of awareness, attitude and adoption among it/computer engineering students of LDRP-IRT. In Proceedings of 11th International CALIBER, August 2-4, 2017, Gandhinagar, India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Saqib Ali, Hafiz Javed, and Muhammad Danish. 2021. Adoption of Green IT in Pakistan: a comparison of three competing models through model selection criteria using PLS-SEM. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27 (Jul. 2021), 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-12163-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tho Choon, Ainin Sulaiman, and Hisham Mallasi. 2014. Intention to use green it among students. Int. J. Res. Bus. Technol., 2 (Mar. 2014), 439-445. DOI: 10.17722/ijrbt.v4i2.261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohammad Dalvi-Esfahani, Zohre Alaedini, Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, Sarminah Samad, Shahla Asadi, and Majid Mohammadi. 2020. Students’ green information technology behavior: Beliefs and personality traits. J. Clean. Prod., (June 2020), p. 120406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cheolho Yoon. 2018. Extending the TAM for Green IT: A normative perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav., (Jun. 2018), 129–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.032.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wing S. Chow and Yang Chen. 2009. Intended belief and actual behavior in Green Computing in Hong Kong. Journal of Comput. Inf. Syst., 2 (Dec. 2009), 136–141. DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2009.11645392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chulmo Koo and Namho Chung. 2014. Examining the eco-technological knowledge of Smart Green IT adoption behavior: A self-determination perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, (Oct. 2014), 140–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tunku B. Ahmad and Mohamad Nordin. 2014. University students’ subjective knowledge of green computing and pro-environmental behavior. Inter. Educ. Stu., 2 (Jan. 2014), 64-74. DOI: 10.5539/IES.V7N2P64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Claudia F. Nisa, Jocelyn J. Bélanger, Birga M. Schumpe, and Daiane G. Faller. 2019. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change. Nat. Commun., 1 (Dec 2019), 4545. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hilary Byerly . Nudging pro-environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities. Front. Ecol. Environ., 3 (Apr. 2018), 159–168. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1777.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Adriana Gámbaro, Ana C. Ellis, and Victor Prieto. 2013. Influence of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge and health consciousness on olive oil consumption-A Case Study. Food Nutr. Sci., 4 (Ap. 2013), 445–453. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2013.44057.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zuzanna Pieniak, Joris Aertsens, and Wim Verbeke. 2010. Subjective and objective knowledge as determinants of organic vegetables consumption, Food Qual. Prefer., 6 (Sep. 2010), 581–588. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Joris Aertsens, Koen Mondelaers, Wim Verbeke, Jeroen Buysse, and Guido Van Huylenbroeck. 2011. The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations and consumption of organic food. Br. Food J., 11 (Oct. 2011), 1353–1378. DOI: 10.1108/00070701111179988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mary Pothitou, Richard F. Hanna, and Konstantinos J. Chalvatzis. 2016. Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study. Appl. Energy, (Dec. 2016), 1217–1229. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Danae Manika, Savvas Papagiannidis, Michael Bourlakis, and Richard M. Clarke. 2021. Drawing on subjective knowledge and information receptivity to examine an environmental sustainability policy: insights from the uk's bag charge policy. Eur. Manag. Rev., 3 (Sep. 2021), 249–262. DOI: 10.1111/emre.12453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lakshmi Iyer. (2018). Knowledge, attitude and behaviour (KAB) of student community towards electronic waste: a case study. Indian J. Sci. Technol., 10 (Feb. 2018), 1–9. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i10/109038.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson K. Y. Leung, Sim K. Lau, Hannarong Shamsub, and Sim Y. Lau. 2018. A study of perception factors that affect green it behavior completed research. In Proceedings of 2018 AMCIS, Aug 16-18, 2018, New Orlean, LA, USA. AIS Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Adrian S. E. Guemes and Pedro J. C. Herrera. 2016. Green computing: environmentally friendly information technology knowledge and use by university students. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management &Technology, 1 (Nov, 2016), 21-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tunku B. Ahmad, Abdullahi Bello, and Mohamad S. Nordin. 2013. Exploring malaysian university students’ awareness of green computing. GSTF Int. J. Educ, 1 (Nov. 2013), 92-102. DOI: 10.5176/2345-7163_1.2.34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Abdullahi Bello and Tunku B. Ahmad. 2012. Knowledge of green computing among university students and lecturers in malaysia. GSTF Journ. Comp., 1 (Mar. 2013), 108-112. DOI: 10.5176/2251-2195_CSEIT12.10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Noushin L. Ansari, Mahfuz Ashraf, Bushra T. Malik, and Helena Grunfeld. 2010. Green IT awareness and practices: Results from a field study on mobile phone related e-waste in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, Jun. 7-9, 2010, Wollongong, NSW, Australia. IEEE Inc., 375–383. DOI: 10.1109/ISTAS.2010.5514618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. K. Mohamed Haneefa and K. Saranya. 2020. Adoption of green ICT by students: a case study. J. Knowl. Commun. Manag., 1 (Apr. 2020), 1–14. DOI: 10.5958/2277-7946.2020.00001.7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Leila Elgaaied-Gambier, Laurent Bertrandias, and Yohan Bernard. 2020. Cutting the internet's environmental footprint: an analysis of consumers’ self-attribution of responsibility. J. Interact. Mark., (May 2020), 120–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2020.02.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ahed Abugabah and Amira Abubaker. 2018. Green computing: Awareness and practices. In 2018 Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications (ICCTA), 3-5 May, 2018, Istanbul, Turkey. IEEE Inc., 6–10. DOI: 10.1109/CATA.2018.8398646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Rajendra K. Bandi, Anik K. Bose, and Ashay Saxena. 2015. Exploring green IT awareness and adoption among Indian students. In Proceedings of the 2015. ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research, June 4-6, 2015, Newport Beach California, USA. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 87–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2751957.2751964Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Frédéric Bordage. 2008. Glossaire (May 2008). Retrieved May 2, 2022 from https://www.greenit.fr/2008/05/21/glossaire/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Shahin Dezdar. 2017. Green information technology adoption: influencing factors and extension of theory of planned behavior. Soc. Responsib. J., 2 (Jun. 2017), 292–306. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0064.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. The jamovi project, jamovi. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.jamovi.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Joseph Alba and J. Wesley Hutchinson. 2000. Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. J. Consum. Res., 2 (Feb. 2000), 123–56. DOI: 10.1086/314317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicolas Martin, Martin Ragot, and Vincent Savaux. 2021. ‘Acceptability and 5g in the medical field: the impact of the level of information. In Proceedings of Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC), May 26-27, 2021, Novi Sad, Serbia. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 111–116. DOI: 10.1109/ZINC52049.2021.9499276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Adoption of Green IT Behaviours: A Perceived Knowledge Effect on Responsible Digital Practices?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobileHCI '22: Adjunct Publication of the 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
      September 2022
      124 pages
      ISBN:9781450393416
      DOI:10.1145/3528575

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 September 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format