skip to main content
10.1145/3529190.3535339acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EEG Wavelet Classification for Fall Detection with Genetic Programming

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ability to autonomously detect a physical fall is one of the many enabling technologies towards better independent living. This work explores how genetic programming can be leveraged to develop machine learning pipelines for the classification of falls via EEG brainwave activity. Eleven physical activities (5 types of falls and 6 non-fall activities) are clustered into a binary classification problem of whether a fall has occurred or not. Wavelet features are extracted from the brainwaves before machine learning models are explored and tuned for better k-fold classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results show that solutions discovered through genetic programming can detect falls with a mean accuracy of 89.34%, precision of 0.883, recall of 0.908, and an F1-Score of 0.895 from EEG brainwave data alone. All three genetic programming solutions chose a further step of Principal Component Analysis for additional feature extraction from the computed wavelet features, each with iterated powers of 6, 3, and 7, and all with a randomised Singular Value Decomposition approach. The best model is finally analysed via the Receiver Operating Characteristic and Precision-Recall curves. Python code for each of the genetic programming pipelines are provided.

References

  1. Allan L Adkin, Sylvia Quant, Brian E Maki, and William E McIlroy. 2006. Cortical responses associated with predictable and unpredictable compensatory balance reactions. Experimental brain research 172, 1 (2006), 85–93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anne Felicia Ambrose, Geet Paul, and Jeffrey M Hausdorff. 2013. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas 75, 1 (2013), 51–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Valerio F Annese, Marco Crepaldi, Danilo Demarchi, and Daniela De Venuto. 2016. A digital processor architecture for combined EEG/EMG falling risk prediction. In 2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). IEEE, 714–719.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jordan J Bird, Diego R Faria, Luis J Manso, Anikó Ekárt, and Christopher D Buckingham. 2019. A deep evolutionary approach to bioinspired classifier optimisation for brain-machine interaction. Complexity 2019(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeffrey Braithwaite, Russell Mannion, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Paul G Shekelle, Stuart Whittaker, Samir Al-Adawi, Kristiana Ludlow, Wendy James, Hsuen P Ting, Jessica Herkes, 2018. The future of health systems to 2030: a roadmap for global progress and sustainability. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 30, 10 (2018), 823–831.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jay Chen, Karric Kwong, Dennis Chang, Jerry Luk, and Ruzena Bajcsy. 2006. Wearable sensors for reliable fall detection. In 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, 3551–3554.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sameer Raju Dhole, Amith Kashyap, Animesh Narayan Dangwal, and Rajasekar Mohan. 2019. A novel helmet design and implementation for drowsiness and fall detection of workers on-site using EEG and Random-Forest Classifier. Procedia Computer Science 151 (2019), 947–952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. David Eibling. 2018. Balance disorders in older adults. Clinics in geriatric medicine 34, 2 (2018), 175–181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhavalkumar H Joshi, UK Jaliya, and Darshak Thakore. 2015. Raw EEG-based Fatigue and Drowsiness Detection: A Review. International Institute for Technological Research and Development 1, 1(2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sridhar Krishnan and Yashodhan Athavale. 2018. Trends in biomedical signal feature extraction. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 43 (2018), 41–63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yun Li, KC Ho, and Mihail Popescu. 2012. A microphone array system for automatic fall detection. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 59, 5 (2012), 1291–1301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Fabien Lotte and Marco Congedo. 2016. EEG feature extraction. Brain–Computer Interfaces 1: Foundations and Methods (2016), 127–143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kavita Mahajan, MR Vargantwar, and Sangita M Rajput. 2011. Classification of EEG using PCA, ICA and Neural Network. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 1, 1(2011), 80–83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lourdes Martínez-Villaseñor, Hiram Ponce, Jorge Brieva, Ernesto Moya-Albor, José Núñez-Martínez, and Carlos Peñafort-Asturiano. 2019. UP-fall detection dataset: A multimodal approach. Sensors 19, 9 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Muhammad Mubashir, Ling Shao, and Luke Seed. 2013. A survey on fall detection: Principles and approaches. Neurocomputing 100(2013), 144–152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Abdallah Naser, Ahmad Lotfi, and Junpei Zhong. 2022. Multiple thermal sensor array fusion towards enabling privacy-preserving human monitoring applications. IEEE Internet of Things Journal(2022).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. National Health Service. 2021. Falls. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/falls/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Office for National Statistics. 2021. Dataset: Vital statistics in the UK: births, deaths and marriages. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/vitalstatisticspopulationandhealthreferencetablesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Randal S Olson, Nathan Bartley, Ryan J Urbanowicz, and Jason H Moore. 2016. Evaluation of a tree-based pipeline optimization tool for automating data science. In Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference 2016. 485–492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825–2830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Parisa Rashidi and Alex Mihailidis. 2012. A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 17, 3(2012), 579–590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Caroline Rougier, Jean Meunier, Alain St-Arnaud, and Jacqueline Rousseau. 2007. Fall detection from human shape and motion history using video surveillance. In 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW’07), Vol. 2. IEEE, 875–880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mridu Sahu, Praveen Shukla, Aditya Chandel, Saloni Jain, and Shrish Verma. 2021. Eye Blinking Classification Through NeuroSky MindWave Headset Using EegID Tool. In International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Springer, 789–799.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A Hasan Sapci and H Aylin Sapci. 2019. Innovative assisted living tools, remote monitoring technologies, artificial intelligence-driven solutions, and robotic systems for aging societies: systematic review. JMIR aging 2, 2 (2019), e15429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Robert E Schapire. 2013. Explaining adaboost. In Empirical inference. Springer, 37–52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Judy A Stevens, Phaedra S Corso, Eric A Finkelstein, and Ted R Miller. 2006. The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Injury prevention 12, 5 (2006), 290–295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Abdulhamit Subasi. 2007. EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and a mixture of expert model. Expert Systems with Applications 32, 4 (2007), 1084–1093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Abdulhamit Subasi and M Ismail Gursoy. 2010. EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines. Expert systems with applications 37, 12 (2010), 8659–8666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mary E Tinetti, Mark Speechley, and Sandra F Ginter. 1988. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. New England journal of medicine 319, 26 (1988), 1701–1707.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Elif Derya Übeyli. 2009. Combined neural network model employing wavelet coefficients for EEG signals classification. Digital Signal Processing 19, 2 (2009), 297–308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Yuxi Wang, Kaishun Wu, and Lionel M Ni. 2016. Wifall: Device-free fall detection by wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 16, 2 (2016), 581–594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Xinyang Yu, Pharino Chum, and Kwee-Bo Sim. 2014. Analysis the effect of PCA for feature reduction in non-stationary EEG based motor imagery of BCI system. Optik 125, 3 (2014), 1498–1502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Biao Zhang, Jianjun Wang, and Thomas Fuhlbrigge. 2010. A review of the commercial brain-computer interface technology from perspective of industrial robotics. In 2010 IEEE international conference on automation and logistics. IEEE, 379–384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. EEG Wavelet Classification for Fall Detection with Genetic Programming
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            PETRA '22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
            June 2022
            704 pages
            ISBN:9781450396318
            DOI:10.1145/3529190

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 July 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format