Elvar Atli Ævarsson
Abstract
This article presents an investigation into the perceptual vibrotactile thresholds for a range of frequencies on both the inside and outside areas of the wrist when exciting the skin with parallel vibrations, realized using the L5 actuator made by Lofelt GmbH. The vibrotactile threshold of 30 participants was measured using a modified audiometry test for the frequency range of 25–1,000 Hz. The average threshold across the respective frequencies was then ultimately determined from acceleration minima. The results show that maximum sensitivity lies in the range of 100–275 Hz (peaking at 200 Hz) for the inside and 75–250 Hz (peaking at 125 Hz) for the outside of the wrist and that thresholds are overall higher for the hairy skin on the outside of the wrist than for the glabrous skin on the inside. The results also show that the vibrotactile thresholds varied highly between individuals. Hence, personalized threshold measurements at the actuator locations will be required to fine-tune a device for the user. This study is a part of an ongoing research and development project where the aim is to develop a tactile display device and a music encoding scheme with the purpose of augmenting the musical enjoyment of cochlear implant recipients. These results, along with results from planned follow-up experiments, will be used to determine the appropriate frequency range and to cast light on the dynamic range on offer for the tactile device.
- [1] L5 Actuator. 2020. Retrieved Aug. 1, 2020 from https://lofelt.com/technology.Google Scholar
- [2] . 1988. Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. J. Acoust. Societ. Amer. 84 (
12 1988), 1680–94.DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref
- [3] . 1994. Hairy skin: Psychophysical channels and their physiological substrates. Somatosens Mot. Res. 11, 3 (1994), 279–290.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [4] A. J. Brisben, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson. 1994. Detection of vibration transmitted through an object grasped in the hand. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 4 (Apr. 1994), 1548–1558.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [5] . 2016. Impaired perception of sensory consonance and dissonance in cochlear implant users. Otol. Neurotol. 37,3 (
Mar. 2016), 229–234.DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [6] . 1968. Vibrotactile spatial summation. Percept. Psychophys. 4 (1968), 351–354.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [7] . 1985. Vibrotactile performance by normal and hearing-impaired subjects using two commercially available vibrators. Audiology 24, 5 (1985), 362–373.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [8] . 1996. Vibrotactile threshold in young and old observers: The effects of spatial summation and the presence of a rigid surround. J. Acoust. Societ. Amer. 99 (1996), 2256–2269.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [9] . 2009. MLP: A MATLAB toolbox for rapid and reliable auditory threshold estimation. Behav. Res. Meth. 41, 1 (2009), 21–28.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [10] . 1993. A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task. J. Acoust. Societ. Amer. 93 (1993), 2096–2105.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [11] . 2019. The intensity order illusion: Temporal order of different vibrotactile intensity causes systematic localization errors. J. Neurophys. (2019).Google ScholarCross Ref
- [12] Rebekka Hoffmann, Manje Brinkhuis, Runar Unnthorsson, and Árni Kristjánsson. 2019. The intensity order illusion: Temporal order of different vibrotactile intensity causes systematic localization errors. J. Neurophysiol. 122, 4 (Oct. 2019), 1810–1820.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [13] . 2016. The sound of vision project: On the feasibility of an audio-haptic representation of the environment, for the visually impaired. Brain Sci. 6, 3 (2016), 1–20.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [14] . 2017. Relative vibrotactile spatial acuity of the torso. Experim. Brain Res. 235, 11 (2017), 3505–3515.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [15] . 2016. Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 34, 5 (
Sep. 2016), 769–787.DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [16] . 2012. Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users. Hear. Res. 284, 1 (2012), 16–24.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [17] . 2015. Investigating the information transfer efficiency of a 3x3 watch-back tactile display. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1229–1232.Google Scholar
- [18] Lofelt GmbH. 2019. Lofelt L5 actuator. L5 datasheet, Jan. 2019 [revised Jul. 2019].Google Scholar
- [19] . 2004. Pitch discrimination and melody recognition by cochlear implant users. Int. Congr. Series 1273 (2004), 197–200.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [20] Jack M. Loomis, Roberta Klatzky, and Nicholas Giudice. 2012. Sensory Substitution of Vision: Importance of Perceptual and Cognitive Processing. In Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision, R. Manduchi and S. Kurniawan (Eds.). CRC Press, 162–191.Google Scholar
- [21] . 2006. Vibrotactile frequency discrimination in human hairy skin. J. Neurophys. 95, 3 (2006), 1442–1450.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [22] . 2022. The haptic intensity order illusion is caused by amplitude changes. Manuscript submitted for publication (2022).Google Scholar
- [23] . 2014. Whole-body mapping of spatial acuity for pain and touch. Ann. Neurol. 75, 6 (2014), 917–924.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [24] . 2019. Timbre Perception with Cochlear Implants. Springer, 273–293.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [25] . 2020. Histology, Meissner corpuscle. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK518980/.Google Scholar
- [26] . 2015. Multiscale mechanical model of the Pacinian corpuscle shows depth and anisotropy contribute to the Receptor’s characteristic response to indentation. PLoS Computat. Biol. 11, 9 (
09 2015), 1–16.DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [27] . 2013. Sensory substitution devices: Creating “artificial synesthesias.” Oxford Handb. Synesth. (
Dec. 2013).DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [28] . 2013. Mechanical and psychophysical studies of surface wave propagation during vibrotactile stimulation. IEEE Trans. Hapt. 6, 3 (
Jul. 2013), 320–329.DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library
- [29] . 1963. Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactile threshold. J. Acoust. Societ. Amer. 35, 12 (
Dec. 1963).DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [30] . 1971. Vibrotactile thresholds measured at the finger. Percept. Psychophys. 9 (1971), 329–330.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Vibrotactile Threshold Measurements at the Wrist Using Parallel Vibration Actuators
Recommendations
Vibration Control of a Planar Parallel Manipulator Using Piezoelectric Actuators
This paper presents an active damping control approach applied to piezoelectric actuators attached to flexible linkages of a planar parallel manipulator for the purpose of attenuation of unwanted mechanical vibrations. Lightweight linkages of parallel ...
Smooth Vibrotactile Flow Generation Using Two Piezoelectric Actuators
This paper proposes a method for generating a smooth directional vibrotactile flow on a thin plate. While actuating two piezoelectric actuators spatially across the plate, temporal sweeping of the input excitation frequency from zero to the first mode ...
Development of a Planar 3PRP Parallel Manipulator using Shape Memory Alloy Spring based Actuators
AIR '17: Proceedings of the 2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in RoboticsThis paper presents the development of a SMA (shape memory alloy) spring actuation based 3-dof (three degree of freedom) 3PRP (prismatic-rotary-prismatic) planar parallel manipulator where each limb (3 stands for three limbs) of the manipulator having ...
Comments