research-article

Comparing different perspectives of characterizing interdisciplinarity of scientific publications: author vs. publication perspectives

Authors:

Yi BuAuthors Info & Claims

JCDL '22: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries

Article No.: 27, Pages 1 - 10

https://doi.org/10.1145/3529372.3530914

Published: 20 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This study compares two distinct perspectives of characterizing interdisciplinarity of scientific publications, namely author- and publication-based perspectives. The publication-based perspectives calculate interdisciplinarity of a publication from its references and citing papers. Author-based perspectives characterize interdisciplinarity of a scientific publication using its authors' prior published records. We employ various extant diversity indicators including variety, balance, disparity, Simpson's index, ²D^S, and ID to capture the characteristics of interdisciplinarity from different perspectives. An overall analysis, journal-level analysis, and case studies are provided in the current study. We find that author- and publication-based perspectives are distinct from each other and they contribute to a more holistic picture of interdisciplinarity. Additionally, our results show that characterizing interdisciplinarity from authors' citing papers would generate a ranking that better distinguishes publications.

References

[1]

C. S. Wagner et al., "Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature," Journal of Informetrics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14--26, Jan. 2011

[2]

J. Schummer, "Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology," Scientometrics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 425--465, 2004

[3]

National Academies (U.S.), Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine (U.S.), Eds., Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press, 2005.

[4]

S. Chen, Y. Song, J. Qiu, and V. Lariviere, "The effect of interdisciplinary components' citation intensity on scientific impact," LHT, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1084--1096, Nov. 2021

[5]

L. Zhang, R. Rousseau, and W. Glänzel, "Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account," J Assn Inf Sci Tec, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1257--1265, May 2016

Digital Library

[6]

A. L. Porter, A. S. Cohen, J. David Roessner, and M. Perreault, "Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity," Scientometrics, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 117--147, Jul. 2007

[7]

Y. Bu, M. Li, W. Gu, and W. Huang, "Topic diversity: A discipline scheme-free diversity measurement for journals," J Assoc Inf Sci Technol, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 523--539, May 2021

Digital Library

[8]

K. Karunan, H. H. Lathabai, and T. Prabhakaran, "Discovering interdisciplinary interactions between two research fields using citation networks," Scientometrics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 335--367, Oct. 2017

Digital Library

[9]

A. L. Porter and I. Rafols, "Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time," Scientometrics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 719--745, Dec. 2009

[10]

A. Stirling, "On the economics and analysis of diversity," 1998.

[11]

A. Stirling and F. Centre, "A General Framework for Analysing Diversity in Science, Technology and Society," Journal of the Royal Society Interface, p. 51.

[12]

I. Rafols and M. Meyer, "Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience," Scientometrics, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 263--287, Feb. 2010

[13]

G. Abramo, C. A. D'Angelo, and L. Zhang, "A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: The disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list," Journal of Informetrics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1182--1193, Nov. 2018

[14]

W. Zhang, S. Shi, X. Huang, S. Zhang, P. Yao, and Y. Qiu, "The distinctiveness of author interdisciplinarity: A long-neglected issue in research on interdisciplinarity," Journal of Information Science, p. 016555152093949, Aug. 2020

Digital Library

[15]

L. Leydesdorff and I. Rafols, "Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations," Journal of Informetrics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 87--100, Jan. 2011

[16]

C. Min, Y. Bu, D. Wu, Y. Ding, and Y. Zhang, "Identifying citation patterns of scientific breakthroughs: A perspective of dynamic citation process," Information Processing & Management, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 102428, Jan. 2021

[17]

L. Leydesdorff, C. S. Wagner, and L. Bornmann, "Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient," Journal of Informetrics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 255--269, 2019.

[18]

L. Jost, "Entropy and diversity," Oikos, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 363--375, May 2006

[19]

T. Leinster and C. A. Cobbold, "Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity," Ecology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 477--489, Mar. 2012

[20]

C. R. Rao, "Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach," Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 24--43, Feb. 1982

[21]

J. Wang, B. Thijs, and W. Glänzel, "Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity," PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 5, p. e0127298, May 2015

[22]

A. M. Petersen, M. E. Ahmed, and I. Pavlidis, "Grand challenges and emergent modes of convergence science," Humanit Soc Sci Commun, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 194, Dec. 2021

Cited By

Hu LHuang WBu Y(2024)Interdisciplinary research attracts greater attention from policy documents: evidence from COVID-19Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10.1057/s41599-024-02915-811:1Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02915-8
Liu MYang SBu YZhang N(2023)Female early-career scientists have conducted less interdisciplinary research in the past six decades: evidence from doctoral thesesHumanities and Social Sciences Communications10.1057/s41599-023-02392-510:1Online publication date: 7-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02392-5

Index Terms

Comparing different perspectives of characterizing interdisciplinarity of scientific publications: author vs. publication perspectives
1. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
    1. Digital libraries and archives

Recommendations

Sixty-four years of informetrics research: productivity, impact and collaboration

This paper analyses the information science research field of informetrics to identify publication strategies that have been important for its successful researchers. The study uses a micro-analysis of informetrics researchers from 5,417 informetrics ...
On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact

This article analyzes the effect of interdisciplinarity on the scientific impact of individual articles. Using all the articles published in Web of Science in 2000, we define the degree of interdisciplinarity of a given article as the percentage of its ...
Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications

The growing complexity of challenges involved in scientific progress demands ever more frequent application of competencies and knowledge from different scientific fields. The present work analyzes the degree of collaboration among scientists from ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

JCDL '22: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries

June 2022

392 pages

ISBN:9781450393454

DOI:10.1145/3529372

General Chairs:
Akiko Aizawa
National Institute of Informatics, Japan
,
Thomas Mandl
University of Hildesheim, Germany
,
Zeljko Carevic
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany
,
Program Chairs:
Annika Hinze
University of Waikato, New Zealand
,
Philipp Mayr
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany
,
Philipp Schaer
TH Köln (University of Applied Sciences), Germany

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

IEEE Technical Committee on Digital Libraries (TC DL)

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Conference

JCDL '22

Sponsor:

JCDL '22: The ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2022

June 20 - 24, 2022

Cologne, Germany

Acceptance Rates

JCDL '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 132 submissions, 27%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
125
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)21
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Hu LHuang WBu Y(2024)Interdisciplinary research attracts greater attention from policy documents: evidence from COVID-19Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10.1057/s41599-024-02915-811:1Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02915-8
Liu MYang SBu YZhang N(2023)Female early-career scientists have conducted less interdisciplinary research in the past six decades: evidence from doctoral thesesHumanities and Social Sciences Communications10.1057/s41599-023-02392-510:1Online publication date: 7-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02392-5

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten