skip to main content
10.1145/3529372.3530947acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Synthesizing digital libraries and digital humanities perspectives for illuminating under-investigated complexities associated with user-generated book reviews

Published: 20 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The abundance of user-generated book reviews has opened up unprecedented research opportunities for digital humanities (DH) research. However, there remains a dearth of attention to the complexities and scholarly usabilities of such web data. Given digital libraries (DL) expertise in web archives and scholarly datasets, my thesis explores how to synthesize DL and DH to illuminate the under-examined complexities (namely temporal changes, cultural divergence, and user power dynamics) associated with usergenerated book reviews and improve the scholarly usability of such emergent data provisions.

References

[1]
Maria Antoniak, Melanie Walsh, and David Mimno. 2021. Tags, Borders, and Catalogs: Social Re-Working of Genre on LibraryThing. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--29.
[2]
Karen Bourrier and Mike Thelwall. 2020. The social lives of books: Reading Victorian literature on Goodreads. Journal of Cultural Analytics 1, 1 (2020), 12049.
[3]
Nan Hu, Indranil Bose, Noi Sian Koh, and Ling Liu. 2012. Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decision support systems 52, 3 (2012), 674--684.
[4]
Theodoros Lappas, Gaurav Sabnis, and Georgios Valkanas. 2016. The impact of fake reviews on online visibility: A vulnerability assessment of the hotel industry. Information Systems Research 27, 4 (2016), 940--961.
[5]
Hongliu Li, Xingyuan Wang, Shuyang Wang, Wenkai Zhou, and Zhilin Yang. 2022. The power of numbers: an examination of the relationship between numerical cues in online review comments and perceived review helpfulness. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (2022).
[6]
Suman Kalyan Maity, Abhishek Panigrahi, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2017. Book reading behavior on goodreads can predict the amazon best sellers. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017. 451--454.
[7]
Megan McCluskey. 2021. Goodreads' problem with extortion scams and review bombing. https://time.com/6078993/goodreads-review-bombing/
[8]
Simone Murray. 2021. Secret agents: Algorithmic culture, Goodreads and datafication of the contemporary book world. European Journal of Cultural Studies 24, 4 (2021), 970--989.
[9]
Melanie Walsh and Maria Antoniak. 2021. The Goodreads 'Classics': A Computational Study of Readers, Amazon, and Crowdsourced Amateur Criticism. Journal of Cultural Analytics 4 (2021), 243--287.
[10]
Mengting Wan, Rishabh Misra, Ndapa Nakashole, and Julian J. McAuley. 2019. Fine-Grained Spoiler Detection from Large-Scale Review Corpora. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, Anna Korhonen, David R. Traum, and Lluís Màrquez (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2605--2610.
[11]
Jing Wang, Anindya Ghose, and Panos Ipeirotis. 2012. Bonus, disclosure, and choice: what motivates the creation of high-quality paid reviews?. In ICIS 2012 Proceedings. Citeseer.
[12]
Wikipedia contributors. 2021. Douban. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douban
[13]
Wikipedia contributors. 2021. Goodreads. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodreads
[14]
Lotte M Willemsen, Peter C Neijens, Fred Bronner, and Jan A De Ridder. 2011. "Highly recommended!" The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 1 (2011), 19--38.
[15]
Adam Worrall. 2015. " Like a Real Friendship": Translation, Coherence, and Convergence of Information Values in LibraryThing and Goodreads. iConference 2015 Proceedings (2015).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Research with User-Generated Book Review Data: Legal and Ethical Pitfalls and Contextualized MitigationsInformation for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_13(163-186)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023

Index Terms

  1. Synthesizing digital libraries and digital humanities perspectives for illuminating under-investigated complexities associated with user-generated book reviews

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      JCDL '22: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
      June 2022
      392 pages
      ISBN:9781450393454
      DOI:10.1145/3529372
      • General Chairs:
      • Akiko Aizawa,
      • Thomas Mandl,
      • Zeljko Carevic,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Annika Hinze,
      • Philipp Mayr,
      • Philipp Schaer
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      • IEEE Technical Committee on Digital Libraries (TC DL)

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 June 2022

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. book reviews
      2. digital humanities
      3. digital libraries
      4. user-generated content
      5. web archives

      Qualifiers

      • Extended-abstract

      Conference

      JCDL '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      JCDL '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 132 submissions, 27%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Research with User-Generated Book Review Data: Legal and Ethical Pitfalls and Contextualized MitigationsInformation for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity10.1007/978-3-031-28035-1_13(163-186)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media