skip to main content
10.1145/3529372.3533293acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

The hurdles of current data citation practices and the adding-value of providing PIDs below study level

Published: 20 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This paper discusses the data reuse principle from the end-user standpoint, addressing the data citation hurdles, particularly in the Social Sciences. Referencing research data and their inherited detailed entities by Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) supports FAIR data usage. However, in the Social Sciences, PIDs are only available on the study level, but not on the level of the inline data objects, such as survey variables. Since citing research data is the backbone of proper data reuse, this paper proposes an infrastructure to reference specific attributes within data sets, assigning PIDs to the finegrained level of attributes. By assigning PIDs to these attributes, individual elements of the data files can be referenced and retrieved with the required metadata for both machine-actionable as well as human access.

References

[1]
Springer Nature Limited. 2019. Editorial Policies: Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols. 2022. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/reporting-standards#data
[2]
Public Library of Science Plos One. 2015. Materials, Software and Code Sharing, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing
[3]
Briney, Kristin, Goben, Abigail, Zilinski, Lisa. 2015. Do You Have an Institutional Data Policy? A Review of the Current Landscape of Library Data Services and Institutional Data Policies. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, Forest Grove, v.3, n.2, p. 1--25.
[4]
Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3, 160018.
[5]
Estevão, Janete Saldanha Bach. 2019. Information Literacy for data reuse in Social Sciences in Virtual Research Environments: proposal of requirements and competences. 2019. Thesis (PhD in Technology and Society) - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 2019.
[6]
McMurry JA, et. al. 2017. Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data. PLoS Biol. 2017 Jun 29;15(6):e2001414.
[7]
See https://datacite.org/
[8]
W3C. 2015. Dataset Descriptions: HCLS Community Profile [Internet]. 2015. https://www.w3.org/TR/hcls-dataset/
[9]
A Persistent Identifier (PID) is a persistent, a unique and globally resolvable identifier that is based on an openly specified PID Scheme.
[10]
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) see
[11]
See https://www.handle.net/
[12]
Uniform Resource Name (URN) see https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml
[13]
Archival Resource Keys (ARKs).
[14]
European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2018. Turning FAIR into reality: final report and action plan from the European Commission expert group on FAIR data, Publications Office
[15]
Silvello, G. 2018. Theory and practice of data citation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69: p. 6--20.
[16]
NFDI project number 442494171.
[17]
See www.nfdi.de
[18]
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCDE). 2007. Glossary of statistical terms, p. 836. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/coded_files/OECD_glossary_stat_terms.pdf.
[19]
The International Statistical Institute. 2003. The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms. Yadolah Dodge [ed]. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Drislane, Robert; Parkinson, Gary. Social science dictionary. Athabasca University and ICAAP. https://bitbucket.icaap.org/dict.pl?alpha=V.
[21]
Sun, Guangyuan, & Khoo, Christopher. S. G. 2018. A Framework to represent variables and values in Social Science research data sets to support data curation and reuse in Challenges and Opportunities for Knowledge Organization in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9--11 July 2018 Porto, Portugal. p 231- 239.
[22]
Leiden University's Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS). 2017. Open data the researcher perspective. 48 p. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/281920/Open-data-report.pdf.
[23]
Minarik, P. 2014. Employment, wages, and religious revivals in postcommunist countries. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(2), 296--315.
[24]
Clobert, M., Saroglou, V., Hwang, K. K., & Soong, W. L. 2014. East Asian Religious Tolerance---A Myth or a Reality? Empirical Investigations of Religious Prejudice in East Asian Societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(10), 1515--1533.
[25]
Abad, Ricardo G. 2001. Religion in the Philippines. Philippine Studies, v. 49, n. 3, p. 337--367.
[26]
Hirschle, Jochen. 2010. From Religious to Consumption-Related Routine Activities? Analyzing Ireland's Economic Boom and the Decline in Church Attendance. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2010, v. 49, n. 4, p. 673--687.
[27]
Data Citation Synthesis Group. 2014. Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. Martone M. (ed.) San Diego CA: FORCE11.
[28]
Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices, C.-I., 2013. Out of Cite, Out of Mind: The Current State of Practice, Policy, and Technology for the Citation of Data. Data Science Journal, 12, pp. CIDCR1--CIDCR7.
[29]
The SSHOC project aims to build the Social Science and Humanities (SSH) part of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC).
[30]
Nicolas Larrousse, & Edward J. Gray. 2021. Recommendations for FAIR Data Citation in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Zenodo.
[31]
A Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud. 2020.
[32]
EOSC is an integrated infrastructure to create a web of FAIR data. The development of EOSC is a large and ongoing multi-stakeholder initiative.
[38]
da|ra is the registration platform central service for metadata and persistent identifiers (PIDs) in Germany, the DOI registration service for all RDCs, established within the KonsortSWD and operated by GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences and ZBW - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft (Leibniz Information Centre for Economics).
[39]
Service level agreement (SLA) registers the service level of a service provider to its customers and identifies their required expected level of service.
[40]
Hienert, Daniel, Dagmar Kern, Katarina Boland, Benjamin Zapilko, and Peter Mutschke. 2019. "A digital library for research data and related information in the social sciences." In Proceedings of 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 148--157. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
JCDL '22: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
June 2022
392 pages
ISBN:9781450393454
DOI:10.1145/3529372
  • General Chairs:
  • Akiko Aizawa,
  • Thomas Mandl,
  • Zeljko Carevic,
  • Program Chairs:
  • Annika Hinze,
  • Philipp Mayr,
  • Philipp Schaer
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • IEEE Technical Committee on Digital Libraries (TC DL)

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 June 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data citation
  2. persistent identifiers - PIDs
  3. research data infrastructure
  4. social sciences - variable

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

JCDL '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

JCDL '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 132 submissions, 27%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 415 of 1,482 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 61
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media