skip to main content
10.1145/3529399.3529401acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Monitoring and control of environmental parameters to predict growth in citrus crops using Machine Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Currently, in the citrus sector around the world, there are challenges such as the need to increase the efficiency, yield, and quality of the harvest; For this reason, technological alternatives are investigated that allow a reduction in production costs to be achieved. This article presents the development of a system based on artificial neural networks, that uses data captured through sensors, offering recommendations to farmers to improve decision-making. This allows automating in run-time the monitoring and control of processes in the citrus sector, through a mobile platform and a predictive system, to achieve higher production performance. With the system, it is possible to predict the growth of a plant, after a certain time, and perceive when the plant reaches maturity. Together with the monitoring system, it is possible to guide the growth of the plant in a suitable direction according to the characteristics of the plant and the climatic expectations of the seasons.

References

  1. Atul Adya, FAO: Faostat, http://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data/QCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Minoli, D., Sohraby, K., Occhiogrosso, B.: Iot considerations, requirements, and architectures for smart buildings-energy optimization and next-generation building management systems. IEEE Internet Things J. 4(1), 269–283 (2017)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Abdullah, H.M., Zeki, A.M.: Frontend and backend web technologies in social networking sites: Facebook as an example. In: Proc. - 3rd Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. Technol. ACSAT 2014. pp. 85–89 (2014)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. González-González, M.G., Gómez-Sanchis, J., Blasco, J., Soria-Olivas, E., Chueca, P.: Citrusyield: A dashboard for mapping yield and fruit quality of citrus in precision agriculture. Agronomy 10(1), 1–13 (2020)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. 5. Abbasi, M., Yaghmaee, M.H., Rahnama, F.: Internet of things in agriculture: A survey. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Internet Things Appl. IoT 2019 (2019)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Agarwal, S.: Data mining: Data mining concepts and techniques. In: Proc. - 2013 Int. Conf. Mach. Intell. Res. Adv. ICMIRA 2013. pp. 203–207 (2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Liakos, K.G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., Bochtis, D.: Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors (Switzerland) 18(8), 1–29 (2018)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cn, V., Archana, N., Sowmiya, R.: Agriculture analysis using data mining and machine learning techniques. In: 2019 5th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst. ICACCS 2019. p. 984–990 (2019)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitz-Rodríguez, G.A., Efrén, Giacomelli: Yield prediction and growth mode characterization of greenhouse tomatoes with neural networks and fuzzy logic. Trans. ASABE: American Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 52, 2115–2128 (2009)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Benalcázar, D.R.: Hacia la definición del problema agrícola en el ecuador. BDE 15, 1–18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Enciso-Medina, R.P.W. S.D.N., Sauls, J.W.: Los impactos del riego de cítricos B-6205S, http://baen.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2017/01/B-6205SImpacts-of-Irrigation-on-Citrus-Spanish-version.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bohaienko, V., Vsevolod, Popov: Optimization of operation regimes of irrigation canals using genetic algorithms. AG, part Springer Nat. pp. 224–233 (2019)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. MAGAP: NiAP: Gu´ıa T´ecnica sobre el manejo de los c´ıtricos en el Litoral Ecuatoriano (2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zannou, J.G.N., Houndji, V.R.: Sorghum yield prediction using machine learning. In: BioSMART 2019 - Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Bio-Engineering Smart Technol. (2019)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sahatqija, K., Ajdari, J., Zenuni, X., Raufi, B., Ismaili, F.: Comparison between relational and nosql databases. In: 2018 41st Int. Conv. Inf. Commun. Technol. Electron. Microelectron. MIPRO 2018 - Proc. p. 216–221 (2018)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Groff, J.R., Weinberg, P.N.: The complete reference SQL. Osborne (1999)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lei, K., Ma, Y., Tan, Z.: Performance comparison and evaluation of web development technologies in php, python and node.js. In: Proc. - 17th IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Eng. CSE 2014, Jointly with 13th IEEE Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Comput. Commun. IUCC 2014, 13th Int. Symp. Pervasive Syst. p. 661–668. No. December (2015)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Heredia, J.S., Sailema, G.C.: Comparative analysis for web applications based on rest services: Mean stack and java ee stack. KnE Eng. 3(9), 82 (2018)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Brito, H., Santos, A., Bernardino, J., Gomes, A.: Learning analysis of mobile javascript frameworks. In: Iber. Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol. Cist. vol. 2019-June, pp. 19–22 (2019)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Basu, S., : Cloud computing security challenges & solutions-a survey. In: 2018 IEEE 8th Annu. Comput. Commun. Work. Conf. CCWC 2018. vol. 2018-January, p. 347–356 (2018)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Aljumah, A., Ahanger, T.A.: Fog computing and security issues: A review. In: 2018 7th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Control. ICCCC 2018 - Proc. p. 237–239. No. Icccc (2018)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, M.B.: The emerging json-based identity protocol suite. W3C Workshop on Identity in the Browser pp. 1–3 (2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy, L., Alliyu, T., Macvean, A., Kery, M.B., Myers, B.A.: Preliminary analysis of rest api style guidelines. PLATEAU’17 pp. 1–9 (2017)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Andriani, R., Wijayanti, S.E., Wibowo, F.W.: Comparision of aes 128-, 192- and 256-bit algorithm for encryption and description file. In: Proc. - 2018 3rd Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Inf. Syst. Electr. Eng. ICITISEE 2018. p. 120–124 (2018)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lin, Y.D., Huang, C.Y., Wright, M., Kambourakis, G.: Mobile application security. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif). 47(6), 21–23 (2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Verrelst, J., : Machine learning regression algorithms for biophysical parameter retrieval: Opportunities for sentinel-2 and -3. Remote Sens. Environ. 118, 127–139 (2012)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Afshine, A., Shervine, A.: Recurrent neural networks cheatsheet., https://stanford.edu/ shervine/teaching/cs-230/cheatsheet-recurrent-neuralnetworks#architectureGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sepp, S., Hochreiter: Long short-term memory. Jurgen 9(8), 1–32 (1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, X., : Long short-term memory neural network for air pollutant concentration predictions: Method development and evaluation. Environ. Pollut. 231, 997–1004 (2017)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. TensorFlow: Time series forecasting., https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/- structured data/time seriesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Monitoring and control of environmental parameters to predict growth in citrus crops using Machine Learning
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICMLT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies
          March 2022
          291 pages
          ISBN:9781450395748
          DOI:10.1145/3529399

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 June 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format