skip to main content
10.1145/3529399.3529414acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Practical Approach for Road Quality Estimation using Smartphone based Inertial Data: IMU data processing pipeline to estimate road quality

Published:10 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The tight financial situation in many municipalities does not allow them to record and evaluate the condition of their own transport infrastructure in detail. The present rule-based road quality estimation methods are outdated, very expensive and less accurate. The only subjective and non-recurring documentation leads to the fact that there is no resilient data basis for intelligent, data-based condition forecasts, which would actually be possible with methods of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). The considerable potential for cost minimization that such forecasts would open up via maintenance optimization remains untapped. In this research work, we demonstrate a road quality estimation system given the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data from smartphone mounted on a vehicle. The system consists of a data preprocessing pipeline which removes many uncertainties along with more accurate geo-referencing of the raw data, and training a machine learning model to estimate road quality in terms of a continuous variable. Route quality information is gathered together with GPS tracking using the IMU data coming from smartphone mounted on a vehicle. The ground-truth (road quality) is obtained using conventional road quality measurement system. Next, distinctive features are obtained from the IMU raw data. Consequently, a machine learning model is trained to estimate the road quality from the obtained features with high performance.

References

  1. Stefania C. Radopoulou and Ioannis Brilakis. 2016. Improving Road Asset Condition Monitoring. Transportation Research Procedia 14, (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.436Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michael W. Sayers and Steven M. Karamihas. 1998. The Little Book of Profiling. Basic Information about Measuring and Interpreting Road Profiles. The Regent of the University of Michigan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Gong, H. Zhou, C. Gordon, and M. Jalayer. 2012. Mobile Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Highway Inventory Data Collection. In Computing in Civil Engineering (2012), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412343.0069Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Deepak Rajamohan, Bhavana Gannu, and Krishnan Rajan. 2015. MAARGHA: A Prototype System for Road Condition and Surface Type Estimation by Fusing Multi-Sensor Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4, 3 (July 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4031225Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Taehee Lee, Chanjun Chun, and Seung-Ki Ryu. 2021. Detection of Road-Surface Anomalies Using a Smartphone Camera and Accelerometer. Sensors 21, 2 (January 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020561Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chao Wu, Zhen Wang, Simon Hu, Julien Lepine, Xiaoxiang Na, Daniel Ainalis, and Marc Stettler. 2020. An Automated Machine-Learning Approach for Road Pothole Detection Using Smartphone Sensor Data. Sensors 20, 19 (September 2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/s20195564Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Ezra Aragón, M. Ricardo Carlos, Luis C. González Gurrola, and Hugo Jair Escalante. 2016. A Machine Learning Pipeline to Automatically Identify and Classify Roadway Surface Disruptions. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Mexican International Conference on Computer Science, ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3149235.3149238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rosa L Figueroa, Qing Zeng-Treitler, Sasikiran Kandula, and Long H Ngo. 2012. Predicting sample size required for classification performance. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12, 1 (December 2012). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 2006. ZTV ZEB-StB. Zusätzliche Technische Vertragsbedingungen und Richtlinien zur Zustandserfassung und -bewertung von Straßen. Technische Regelwerke FGSV-Nr.: 489. Retrieved November 2, 2021 from https://www.fgsv-verlag.de/ztv-zeb-stbGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Viengnam Douangphachanh and Hiroyuki Oneyama. 2014. Exploring the Use of Smartphone Accelerometer and Gyroscope to Study on the Estimation of Road Surface Roughness Condition. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, SCITEPRESS - Science and and Technology Publications. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5220/0005117407830787Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Koichi Yagi. 2010. Extensional Smartphone Probe for Road Bump Detection.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shahram Sattar, Songnian Li, and Michael Chapman. 2018. Road Surface Monitoring Using Smartphone Sensors: A Review. Sensors 18, 11 (November 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113845Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. F. J. Bruwer and M. J. Booysen. 2015. Vehicle Acceleration Estimation Using Smartphone-Based Sensors. South African Transport Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. D. Tundo, E. Lemaire, and N. Baddour. 2013. Correcting Smartphone orientation for accelerometer-based analysis. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), IEEE. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2013.6549706Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dirk Werth, Jan-Philipp Exner, and Oliver Nalbach. 2020. Monitoring Street Infrastructures with Artificial Intelligence. In SHAPING URBAN CHANGE–Livable City Regions for the 21st Century. Proceedings of REAL CORP 2020, 25th International Conference on Urban Development, Regional Planning and Information Society, 589–597.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cyface - qualitative Analyse & Erfassung von Verkehrsdaten. Retrieved November 3, 2021 from https://www.cyface.de/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. GraphHopper. Retrieved November 2, 2021 from https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper#map-matchingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Maximilian Christ, Andreas W. Kempa-Liehr, and Michael Feindt. 2016. Distributed and parallel time series feature extraction for industrial big data applications. (October 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Laurent Amsaleg, Oussama Chelly, Teddy Furon, Stéphane Girard, Michael E. Houle, Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi, and Michael Nett. 2015. Estimating Local Intrinsic Dimensionality. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2783405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A.K. Jain and B. Chandrasekaran. 1982. 39 Dimensionality and sample size considerations in pattern recognition practice. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(82)02042-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosa L Figueroa, Qing Zeng-Treitler, Sasikiran Kandula, and Long H Ngo. 2012. Predicting sample size required for classification performance. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12, 1 (December 2012). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Brady Neal, Sarthak Mittal, Aristide Baratin, Vinayak Tantia, Matthew Scicluna, Simon Lacoste-Julien, and Ioannis Mitliagkas. 2018. A Modern Take on the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Neural Networks. (October 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Practical Approach for Road Quality Estimation using Smartphone based Inertial Data: IMU data processing pipeline to estimate road quality
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICMLT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies
            March 2022
            291 pages
            ISBN:9781450395748
            DOI:10.1145/3529399

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 10 June 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format