skip to main content
10.1145/3529466.3529490acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiciaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis and comparison of improved artificial potential field method and A* in complex obstacle environment

Published:04 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to improve the efficiency of the mobile robot and select a better path planning algorithm suitable for obstacle scenes, the artificial potential field method ( APF ) based on the annealing algorithm and A* algorithm are compared under different obstacles. The two algorithms are simulated in three different complexity scenarios. The results show that the two algorithms perform well in the narrow channel at the target point, in the single model with fewer obstacles, the artificial potential field method has fewer corners and shorter paths. For L-shaped and hill-shaped complex scenes, A* can accurately find shorter paths, and the artificial potential field method is prone to fall into local traps, however, the relatively simple obstacles can be handled by the annealing algorithm.

References

  1. Khatib. 1986. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1986,1(5): 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1985.1087247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen P, Li M, Mou J . 2021. A Velocity Obstacle-Based Real-Time Regional Ship Collision Risk Analysis Method. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021,9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Xiaomin Z, Jianjun Y, Hongkai D, Velocity Obstacle Based on Vertical Ellipse for Multi-Robot Collision Avoidance. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2020,99:183-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01127-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. WANG Hao, ZHAO Xuejun, YUAN Xiujiu. 2022. Robot Path Planning Based on lmproved Adaptive Genetic Algorithm. Electronics Optics & Control, 2022: 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gong Yuehong, Zhang Shaojun, Wang Mingyu, 2022. USV path planning method based on GA-PSO. Journal of Shandong Jiaotong University, 2022,30(01): 29-34. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0032.2022.01.005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang Zhou, Liu Haibin. 2021. AGV Dynamic Path Planning Based on lmproved Ant Colony Algorithm and Dynamic Window Approach. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2021:1-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu Shun, Yan Ronglan, Tai Haojiao, 2022. Path Planning of Agricultural Wheeled Robot Based on Local Potential Field A∼* Algorithm and Dynamic-Window Method. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022,50(02): 192-198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Li Xiang, Min Dequan, Zhang Qi. 2020. Vehicle routing optimization of semi-open cold chain logistics under random Demand. Packaging Engineering, 2020:1-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Paola B, Matthieu J, Federico L, 2019. Degree-Greedy Algorithms on Large Random Graphs. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 2019,46(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308897.3308910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wang Qiang, Zhang An, Wu Zhongjie. 2014. Improved artificial potential field method and simulated annealing algorithm for UAV route planning. Fire control & command control, 2014,39(08):70-73. https://doi.org/ 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2014.08.017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wan Ping. 2018. Route Planning Algorithm Design and Simulation Research Based on A-Star Algorithm. China Water Transport. Waterway Science and Technology, 2018(04):58-65. https://doi.org/10.19412/j.cnki.42-1395/u.2018.04.013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Han Yao, Li Shaohua. 2021. Trajectory planning of UAV based on improved artificial potential field method. System Engineering and Electronics, 2021,43(11): 3305-3311. https://doi.org/10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.11.31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xu Xiaoqiang, WANG Mingyong, MAO Yan. 2020. Path planning for mobile robot based on improved artificial potential field method. Journal of Computer Applications, 2020,40(12): 3508-3512. https://doi.org/10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2020050640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu Yuting, Lin Yuyou, Peng Qiaozi, 2015. Review of simulated annealing algorithm improvement and parameter exploration. College Mathematics, 2015,31(06): 96-103. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1454.2015.06.020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin Hanxi, Xiang Dan, Ouyang Jian, 2021. Review of Path Planning Algorithms for Mobile Robots. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2021,57(18): 38-48. https://doi.org/10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2103-0519.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Song Yu, Gu Haijiao. 2020. UAV route planning based on improved A∼* algorithm. Journal of changchun university of technology, 2020,41(06): 597-601. https://doi.org/10.15923/j.cnki.cn22-1382/t.2020.6.14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIAI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence
    March 2022
    240 pages
    ISBN:9781450395502
    DOI:10.1145/3529466

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 June 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format