skip to main content
research-article

Few-shot Aspect Category Sentiment Analysis via Meta-learning

Published:31 January 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Existing aspect-based/category sentiment analysis methods have shown great success in detecting sentiment polarity toward a given aspect in a sentence with supervised learning, where the training and inference stages share the same pre-defined set of aspects. However, in practice, the aspect categories are changing rather than keeping fixed over time. Dealing with unseen aspect categories is under-explored in existing methods. In this article, we formulate a new few-shot aspect category sentiment analysis (FSACSA) task, which aims to effectively predict the sentiment polarity of previously unseen aspect categories. To this end, we propose a novel Aspect-Focused Meta-Learning (AFML) framework that constructs aspect-aware and aspect-contrastive representations from external knowledge to match the target aspect with aspects in the training set. Concretely, we first construct two auxiliary contrastive sentences for a given sentence with the incorporation of external knowledge, enabling the learning of sentence representations with a better generalization. Then, we devise an aspect-focused induction network to leverage the contextual sentiment toward a given aspect to refine the label vectors. Furthermore, we employ the episode-based meta-learning algorithm to train the whole network, so as to learn to generalize to novel aspects. Extensive experiments on multiple real-life datasets show that our proposed AFML framework achieves the state-of-the-art results for the FSACSA task.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Allaway Emily and McKeown Kathleen. 2020. Zero-shot stance detection: A dataset and model using generalized topic representations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). 89138931.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Allaway Emily, Srikanth Malavika, and McKeown Kathleen. 2021. Adversarial learning for zero-shot stance detection on social media. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 47564767. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Bansal Trapit, Jha Rishikesh, and McCallum Andrew. 2020. Learning to few-shot learn across diverse natural language classification tasks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 51085123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Bansal Trapit, Jha Rishikesh, Munkhdalai Tsendsuren, and McCallum Andrew. 2020. Self-supervised meta-learning for few-shot natural language classification tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). 522534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Bao Yujia, Wu Menghua, Chang Shiyu, and Barzilay Regina. 2020. Few-shot text classification with distributional signatures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Bražinskas Arthur, Lapata Mirella, and Titov Ivan. 2020. Few-shot learning for opinion summarization. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). 41194135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Cai Hongjie, Tu Yaofeng, Zhou Xiangsheng, Yu Jianfei, and Xia Rui. 2020. Aspect-category based sentiment analysis with hierarchical graph convolutional network. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 833843.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Cambria Erik, Li Yang, Xing Frank Z., Poria Soujanya, and Kwok Kenneth. 2020. SenticNet 6: Ensemble application of symbolic and subsymbolic AI for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 105114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Cambria Erik, Poria Soujanya, Hazarika Devamanyu, and Kwok Kenneth. 2018. SenticNet 5: Discovering conceptual primitives for sentiment analysis by means of context embeddings. In Proceedings of the Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). 17951802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Chen Ting, Kornblith Simon, Norouzi Mohammad, and Hinton Geoffrey. 2020. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 15971607.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Dai Zehui, Peng Cheng, Chen Huajie, and Ding Yadong. 2020. A multi-task incremental learning framework with category name embedding for aspect-category sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). 69556965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Deng Shumin, Zhang Ningyu, Kang Jiaojian, Zhang Yichi, Zhang Wei, and Chen Huajun. 2020. Meta-learning with dynamic-memory-based prototypical network for few-shot event detection. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 151159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. [13] Deng Shumin, Zhang Ningyu, Sun Zhanlin, Chen Jiaoyan, and Chen Huajun. 2020. When low resource NLP meets unsupervised language model: Meta-pretraining then meta-learning for few-shot text classification (student abstract). In Proceedings of the Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’20). 1377313774.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Devlin Jacob, Chang Ming-Wei, Lee Kenton, and Toutanova Kristina. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). 41714186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Finn Chelsea, Abbeel Pieter, and Levine Sergey. 2017. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70. 11261135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. [16] Gamon Michael, Aue Anthony, Corston-Oliver Simon, and Ringger Eric. 2005. Pulse: Mining customer opinions from free text. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis. Springer, 121132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Gao Tianyu, Han Xu, Liu Zhiyuan, and Sun Maosong. 2019. Hybrid attention-based prototypical networks for noisy few-shot relation classification. In Proceedings of the Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 64076414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Geng Ruiying, Li Binhua, Li Yongbin, Zhu Xiaodan, Jian Ping, and Sun Jian. 2019. Induction networks for few-shot text classification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP’19). 38953904.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Guan Xinyu, Cheng Zhiyong, He Xiangnan, Zhang Yongfeng, Zhu Zhibo, Peng Qinke, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2019. Attentive aspect modeling for review-aware recommendation. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 37, 3, Article 28 (March2019), 27 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Han Xu, Zhu Hao, Yu Pengfei, Wang Ziyun, Yao Yuan, Liu Zhiyuan, and Sun Maosong. 2018. FewRel: A large-scale supervised few-shot relation classification dataset with state-of-the-art evaluation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 48034809.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] He Kaiming, Fan Haoqi, Wu Yuxin, Xie Saining, and Girshick Ross B.. 2020. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’20). IEEE, 97269735. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Hinton Geoffrey E., Krizhevsky Alex, and Wang Sida D.. 2011. Transforming auto-encoders. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, 4451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. [23] Hochreiter Sepp and Schmidhuber Jürgen. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neur. Comput. 9, 8 (1997), 17351780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Hu Minqing and Liu Bing. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 168177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. [25] Hu Mengting, Zhao Shiwan, Guo Honglei, Xue Chao, Gao Hang, Gao Tiegang, Cheng Renhong, and Su Zhong. 2021. Multi-label few-shot learning for aspect category detection. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, 63306340. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Huang Jiaxin, Meng Yu, Guo Fang, Ji Heng, and Han Jiawei. 2020. Weakly-supervised aspect-based sentiment analysis via joint aspect-sentiment topic embedding. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). Association for Computational Linguistics, 69896999. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Jiang Qingnan, Chen Lei, Xu Ruifeng, Ao Xiang, and Yang Min. 2019. A challenge dataset and effective models for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP’19). 62806285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Kiritchenko Svetlana, Zhu Xiaodan, Cherry Colin, and Mohammad Saif. 2014. NRC-canada-2014: Detecting aspects and sentiment in customer reviews. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval’14). 437442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Koch Gregory, Zemel Richard, and Salakhutdinov Ruslan. 2015. Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition. In Proceedings of the ICML Deep Learning Workshop, Vol. 2. Lille.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Lai Viet Dac, Nguyen Thien Huu, and Dernoncourt Franck. 2020. Extensively matching for few-shot learning event detection. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Narrative Understanding, Storylines, and Events. 3845.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Lake Brenden, Salakhutdinov Ruslan, Gross Jason, and Tenenbaum Joshua. 2011. One shot learning of simple visual concepts. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. [32] Leyva Enrique, González Antonio, and Pérez Raúl. 2015. A set of complexity measures designed for applying meta-learning to instance selection. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27, 2 (2015), 354367. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Li Jing, Chiu Billy, Feng Shanshan, and Wang Hao. 2020. Few-shot named entity recognition via meta-learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (2020), 11. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Li Yuncong, Yin Cunxiang, Zhong Sheng-hua, and Pan Xu. 2020. Multi-instance multi-label learning networks for aspect-category sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). 35503560.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Liang Bin, Yin Rongdi, Du Jiachen, Gui Lin, He Yulan, Yang Min, and Xu Ruifeng. 2021. Embedding refinement framework for targeted aspect-based sentiment analysis. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. (2021), 1–1. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Liang Bin, Yin Rongdi, Gui Lin, Du Jiachen, He Yulan, and Xu Ruifeng. 2020. Aspect-invariant sentiment features learning: Adversarial multi-task learning for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 825834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Liu Peng, Zhang Lemei, and Gulla Jon Atle. 2021. Multilingual review-aware deep recommender system via aspect-based sentiment analysis. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 39, 2, Article 15 (January2021), 33 pages. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. [38] Liu Rui, Lin Zheng, Tan Yutong, and Wang Weiping. 2021. Enhancing zero-shot and few-shot stance detection with commonsense knowledge graph. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021. 31523157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] Logeswaran Lajanugen, Chang Ming-Wei, Lee Kenton, Toutanova Kristina, Devlin Jacob, and Lee Honglak. 2019. Zero-shot entity linking by reading entity descriptions. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 34493460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Lu Yuanfu, Fang Yuan, and Shi Chuan. 2020. Meta-learning on heterogeneous information networks for cold-start recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 15631573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Ma Yukun, Cambria Erik, and Gao Sa. 2016. Label embedding for zero-shot fine-grained named entity typing. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (COLING’16). 171180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. [42] Ma Yukun, Peng Haiyun, and Cambria Erik. 2018. Targeted aspect-based sentiment analysis via embedding commonsense knowledge into an attentive LSTM. In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18). 58765883.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. [43] Miller Erik G., Matsakis Nicholas E., and Viola Paul A.. 2000. Learning from one example through shared densities on transforms. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’00), Vol. 1. IEEE, 464471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Miller George A.. 1995. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 11 (1995), 3941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. [45] Munkhdalai Tsendsuren and Yu Hong. 2017. Meta networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 25542563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. [46] Nichol Alex, Achiam Joshua, and Schulman John. 2018. On first-order meta-learning algorithms. arXiv:1803.02999. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.02999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. [47] Pennington Jeffrey, Socher Richard, and Manning Christopher. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 15321543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Pontiki Maria, Galanis Dimitris, Papageorgiou Haris, Androutsopoulos Ion, Manandhar Suresh, AL-Smadi Mohammad, Al-Ayyoub Mahmoud, Zhao Yanyan, Qin Bing, Clercq Orphee De, Hoste Veronique, Apidianaki Marianna, Tannier Xavier, Loukachevitch Natalia, Kotelnikov Evgeniy, Bel Núria, Jiménez-Zafra Salud María, and Eryiğit Gülşen. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 5: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval’16). 1930.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Pontiki Maria, Galanis Dimitris, Papageorgiou Haris, Manandhar Suresh, and Androutsopoulos Ion. 2015. SemEval-2015 Task 12: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval’15). 486495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Pontiki Maria, Galanis Dimitris, Papageorgiou Haris, Manandhar Suresh, and Androutsopoulos Ion. 2015. SemEval-2015 Task 12: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval’15). 486495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. [51] Pontiki Maria, Galanis Dimitris, Pavlopoulos John, Papageorgiou Harris, Androutsopoulos Ion, and Manandhar Suresh. 2014. SemEval-2014 Task 4: Aspect based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval’14). 2735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Popescu Ana-Maria and Etzioni Orena. 2007. Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Natural Language Processing and Text Mining. Springer, 928.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Ravi Sachin and Larochelle Hugo. 2017. Optimization as a model for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. [54] Santoro Adam, Bartunov Sergey, Botvinick Matthew, Wierstra Daan, and Lillicrap Timothy. 2016. Meta-learning with memory-augmented neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. 18421850.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. [55] Satorras Victor Garcia and Estrach Joan Bruna. 2018. Few-shot learning with graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. [56] Schouten Kim, Weijde Onne Van Der, Frasincar Flavius, and Dekker Rommert. 2017. Supervised and unsupervised aspect category detection for sentiment analysis with co-occurrence data. IEEE Trans. Cybernet. 48, 4 (2017), 12631275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. [57] Shah Darsh, Gupta Raghav, Fayazi Amir, and Hakkani-Tur Dilek. 2019. Robust zero-shot cross-domain slot filling with example values. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 54845490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. [58] Snell Jake, Swersky Kevin, and Zemel Richard. 2017. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 40774087.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Speer Robyn, Chin Joshua, and Havasi Catherine. 2017. ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. [60] Sui Dianbo, Chen Yubo, Mao Binjie, Qiu Delai, Liu Kang, and Zhao Jun. 2021. Knowledge guided metric learning for few-shot text classification. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 3266–3271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. [61] Sun Chi, Huang Luyao, and Qiu Xipeng. 2019. Utilizing BERT for aspect-based sentiment analysis via constructing auxiliary sentence. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). 380385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. [62] Sung Flood, Yang Yongxin, Zhang Li, Xiang Tao, Torr Philip H. S., and Hospedales Timothy M.. 2018. Learning to compare: Relation network for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 11991208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. [63] Tay Yi, Tuan Luu Anh, and Hui Siu Cheung. 2018. Learning to attend via word-aspect associative fusion for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Annual AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32. 59565963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. [64] Thrun Sebastian. 1996. Is learning the n-th thing any easier than learning the first? In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 640646.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. [65] Thrun Sebastian. 1998. Lifelong learning algorithms. In Learning to Learn. Springer, Berlin, 181209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Vilalta Ricardo and Drissi Youssef. 2002. A perspective view and survey of meta-learning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 18, 2 (2002), 7795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. [67] Vinyals Oriol, Blundell Charles, Lillicrap Timothy, Wierstra Daan, et al. 2016. Matching networks for one shot learning. Adv. Neur. Inf. Process. Syst. 29 (2016), 36303638.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. [68] Wang Yequan, Huang Minlie, zhu xiaoyan, and Zhao Li. 2016. Attention-based LSTM for aspect-level sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 606615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Wang Yequan, Sun Aixin, Huang Minlie, and Zhu Xiaoyan. 2019. Aspect-level sentiment analysis using AS-capsules. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference. 20332044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. [70] Wang Yaqing, Yao Quanming, Kwok James T., and Ni Lionel M.. 2020. Generalizing from a few examples: A survey on few-shot learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 53, 3 (2020), 134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. [71] Weng Lilian. 2018. Meta-learning: Learning to Learn Fast. Retrieved from http://lilianweng.github.io/lil-log/2018/11/29/meta-learning.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. [72] Wu Ledell, Petroni Fabio, Josifoski Martin, Riedel Sebastian, and Zettlemoyer Luke. 2020. Scalable zero-shot entity linking with dense entity retrieval. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). 63976407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. [73] Xue Wei and Li Tao. 2018. Aspect based sentiment analysis with gated convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 25142523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Yang Yi and Katiyar Arzoo. 2020. Simple and effective few-shot named entity recognition with structured nearest neighbor learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’20). Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 63656375. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. [75] Yin Rongdi, Su Hang, Liang Bin, Du Jiachen, and Xu Ruifeng. 2020. Extracting the collaboration of entity and attribute: Gated interactive networks for aspect sentiment analysis. In Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. 802814.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. [76] Yoon Jaesik, Kim Taesup, Dia Ousmane, Kim Sungwoong, Bengio Yoshua, and Ahn Sungjin. 2018. Bayesian model-agnostic meta-learning. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 73437353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. [77] Yu Mo, Guo Xiaoxiao, Yi Jinfeng, Chang Shiyu, Potdar Saloni, Cheng Yu, Tesauro Gerald, Wang Haoyu, and Zhou Bowen. 2018. Diverse few-shot text classification with multiple metrics. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 12061215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. [78] Yu Mo, Guo Xiaoxiao, Yi Jinfeng, Chang Shiyu, Potdar Saloni, Cheng Yu, Tesauro Gerald, Wang Haoyu, and Zhou Bowen. 2018. Diverse few-shot text classification with multiple metrics. In Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers). 12061215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. [79] Zhang Bowen, Yang Min, Li Xutao, Ye Yunming, Xu Xiaofei, and Dai Kuai. 2020. Enhancing cross-target stance detection with transferable semantic-emotion knowledge. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 31883197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Few-shot Aspect Category Sentiment Analysis via Meta-learning

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
              ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 41, Issue 1
              January 2023
              759 pages
              ISSN:1046-8188
              EISSN:1558-2868
              DOI:10.1145/3570137
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 31 January 2023
              • Online AM: 22 April 2022
              • Accepted: 30 March 2022
              • Revised: 22 March 2022
              • Received: 10 July 2021
              Published in tois Volume 41, Issue 1

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            Full Text

            View this article in Full Text.

            View Full Text

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format