skip to main content
10.1145/3531073.3534464acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

SERENE: a Web platform for the UX semi-automatic evaluation of website

Published: 06 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

This demo presents SERENE, a Web platform for the UX semi-automatic evaluation of websites. It exploits Artificial Intelligence to predict visitors’ emotions starting from their interaction logs. The predicted emotions are shown by interactive heatmaps overlapped to the webpage to be analyzed. The concentration of negative emotions in a specific area of the webpage can help the UX experts identify UX problems.

References

[1]
Muhammad Johan Alibasa and Rafael A. Calvo. 2019. Supporting Mood Introspection from Digital Footprints. In International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction(ACII ’19). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/acii.2019.8925436
[2]
Richard Atterer, Monika Wnuk, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2006. Knowing the user’s every move. In International Conference on World Wide Web(WWW ’06). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1135777.1135811
[3]
Paolo Buono, Danilo Caivano, Maria Francesca Costabile, Giuseppe Desolda, and Rosa Lanzilotti. 2020. Towards the Detection of UX Smells: The Support of Visualizations. IEEE Access 8(2020), 6901–6914. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2961768
[4]
Layale Constantine, Gilbert Badaro, Hazem Hajj, Wassim El-Hajj, Lama Nachman, Mohammed Bensaleh, and Abdulfattah Obeid. 2016. A Framework for Emotion Recognition from Human Computer Interaction in Natural Setting. In Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(KDD ’16). ACM.
[5]
Giuseppe Desolda, Andrea Esposito, Rosa Lanzilotti, and Maria Francesca Costabile. 2021. Detecting Emotions Through Machine Learning for Automatic UX Evaluation. In 18th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(INTERACT 2021, Vol. 12934), Carmelo Ardito, Rosa Lanzilotti, Alessio Malizia, Helen Petrie, Antonio Piccinno, Giuseppe Desolda, and Kori Inkpen (Eds.). Springer, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85613-7_19
[6]
Amy M. Do, Alexander V. Rupert, and George Wolford. 2008. Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: The peak-end rule. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 1 (2008), 96–98. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.96
[7]
Stefano Federici, Maria Laura Mele, Rosa Lanzilotti, Giuseppe Desolda, Marco Bracalenti, Arianna Buttafuoco, Giancarlo Gaudino, Antonello Cocco, Massimo Amendola, and Emilio Simonetti. 2019. Heuristic Evaluation of eGLU-Box: A Semi-automatic Usability Evaluation Tool for Public Administrations(Heuristic Evaluation of eGLU-Box: A Semi-automatic Usability Evaluation Tool for Public Administrations). Springer International Publishing, 75–86.
[8]
A. Garrido, G. Rossi, and D. Distante. 2011. Refactoring for Usability in Web Applications. IEEE Software 28, 3 (2011), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2010.114
[9]
Iftikhar Ahmed Khan, Willem-Paul Brinkman, and Robert M. Hierons. 2008. Towards a Computer Interaction-Based Mood Measurement Instrument. In Annual Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group(PPIG ’08). ACM.
[10]
Loop11. [n.d.]. Online User Testing Made Easy | Loop11. https://www.loop11.com/
[11]
Patrizia Russo, Rosa Lanzilotti, Maria F. Costabile, and Christopher J. Pettit. 2018. Towards satisfying practitioners in using Planning Support Systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 67 (2018), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.08.009
[12]
Sergio Salmeron-Majadas, Olga C. Santos, and Jesus G. Boticario. 2014. An Evaluation of Mouse and Keyboard Interaction Indicators towards Non-intrusive and Low Cost Affective Modeling in an Educational Context. Procedia Computer Science 35 (2014), 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.151
[13]
Andreas Sonderegger and Juergen Sauer. 2009. The influence of laboratory set-up in usability tests: effects on user performance, subjective ratings and physiological measures. Ergonomics 52, 11 (2009), 1350–1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903067797
[14]
Userlytics. [n.d.]. Remote User Testing Platform | Userlytics. https://www.userlytics.com/
[15]
Larry Vea and Ma Mercedes Rodrigo. 2017. Modeling Negative Affect Detector of Novice Programming Students Using Keyboard Dynamics and Mouse Behavior. In Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence(PRICAI 2016). Springer International Publishing, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60675-0_11
[16]
Luciana A. M. Zaina, Helen Sharp, and Leonor Barroca. 2021. UX information in the daily work of an agile team: A distributed cognition analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 147 (2021), 102574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102574
[17]
Philippe Zimmermann, Sissel Guttormsen, Brigitta Danuser, and Patrick Gomez. 2003. Affective Computing—A Rationale for Measuring Mood With Mouse and Keyboard. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 9, 4(2003), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2003.11076589

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The fine line between automation and augmentation in website usability evaluationScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-59616-014:1Online publication date: 2-May-2024
  • (2024)From human-centered to symbiotic artificial intelligence: a focus on medical applicationsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20414-5Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2023)AI Meets Entrepreneurship: A Framework of Web Platform for Enhancing Skills, Streamlining Finance and Identifying Multiple Intelligence2023 International Conference on Disruptive Technologies (ICDT)10.1109/ICDT57929.2023.10150606(318-324)Online publication date: 11-May-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AVI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
June 2022
414 pages
ISBN:9781450397193
DOI:10.1145/3531073
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 June 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. UX Smells
  2. User eXperience
  3. automatic UX evaluation

Qualifiers

  • Demonstration
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AVI 2022

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The fine line between automation and augmentation in website usability evaluationScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-59616-014:1Online publication date: 2-May-2024
  • (2024)From human-centered to symbiotic artificial intelligence: a focus on medical applicationsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20414-5Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2023)AI Meets Entrepreneurship: A Framework of Web Platform for Enhancing Skills, Streamlining Finance and Identifying Multiple Intelligence2023 International Conference on Disruptive Technologies (ICDT)10.1109/ICDT57929.2023.10150606(318-324)Online publication date: 11-May-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media