skip to main content
10.1145/3531073.3534496acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

An Interactive Visualization Tool to Explore People’s Tweets towards COVID-19

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Twitter has become a powerful medium for people to express their feelings and reactions towards some recent event or happening event. Analyzing and exploring such tweet data gives us in-depth understanding of the underlying event from people perspectives. In this work, we use the power of visualization to explore people’s tweets regarding the COVID-19 pandemic from the time period between April 2020 and March 2021. We use a number of visualizations targeting to show the sentimental polarity of people’s tweets over time and important keywords in people’s tweets and their evolution over time. The resulting visualizations give us an opportunity to explore people’s feelings and reactions during a whole pandemic year and to see how it evolved over time.

References

  1. William B. Claster, Malcolm Cooper, and Philip Sallis. 2010. Thailand – Tourism and Conflict: Modeling Sentiment from Twitter Tweets Using Naïve Bayes and Unsupervised Artificial Neural Nets. In 2010 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation. 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMSiM.2010.98Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Marian Dörk, Daniel Gruen, Carey Williamson, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2010. A Visual Backchannel for Large-Scale Events. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6(2010), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alex Godwin, Yongxin Wang, and John T. Stasko. 2017. TypoTweet Maps: Characterizing Urban Areas through Typographic Social Media Visualization. In Proceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Conference on Visualization: Short Papers (Barcelona, Spain) (EuroVis ’17). Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort.20171128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Orland Hoeber, Larena Hoeber, Maha El Meseery, Kenneth Odoh, and Radhika Gopi. 2016. Visual Twitter Analytics (Vista): Temporally changing sentiment and the discovery of emergent themes within sport event tweets. Online Inf. Rev. 40(2016), 25–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shah Rukh Humayoun, Saman Ardalan, Ragaad AlTarawneh, and Achim Ebert. 2017. TExVis: An Interactive Visual Tool to Explore Twitter Data. In EuroVis 2017 - Short Papers, Barbora Kozlikova, Tobias Schreck, and Thomas Wischgoll (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurovisshort.20171149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shah Rukh Humayoun, Ibrahim Mansour, and Ragaad AlTarawneh. 2021. TEVisE: An Interactive Visual Analytics Tool to Explore Evolution of Keywords’ Relations in Tweet Data. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021, Carmelo Ardito, Rosa Lanzilotti, Alessio Malizia, Helen Petrie, Antonio Piccinno, Giuseppe Desolda, and Kori Inkpen (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 579–599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Renato Kempter, Valentina Sintsova, Claudiu Cristian Musat, and Pearl Pu. 2014. EmotionWatch: Visualizing Fine-Grained Emotions in Event-Related Tweets. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomas Kraft, Derek X. Wang, Jeffrey Delawder, Wenwen Dou, Li Yu, and William Ribarsky. 2013. Less After-the-Fact: Investigative visual analysis of events from streaming twitter. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on Large-Scale Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV). 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/LDAV.2013.6675163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bongshin Lee, Amy Karlson, and Nathalie Henry Riche. 2010. SparkClouds: Visualizing Trends in Tag Clouds. In In IEEE TVCG (Proceedings of Infovis 2010)(in ieee tvcg (proceedings of infovis 2010) ed.). IEEE. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/sparkclouds-visualizing-trends-in-tag-clouds/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jie Li, Siming Chen, Gennady Andrienko, and Natalia Andrienko. 2018. Visual Exploration of Spatial and Temporal Variations of Tweet Topic Popularity. In EuroVis Workshop on Visual Analytics (EuroVA), Christian Tominski and Tatiana von Landesberger (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurova.20181105Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Shenghua Liu, Wenjun Zhu, Ning Xu, Fangtao Li, Xue-qi Cheng, Yue Liu, and Yuanzhuo Wang. 2013. Co-Training and Visualizing Sentiment Evolvement for Tweet Events. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (WWW ’13 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 105–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487788.2487836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yafeng Lu, Xia Hu, Feng Wang, Shamanth Kumar, Huan Liu, and Ross Maciejewski. 2015. Visualizing Social Media Sentiment in Disaster Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (Florence, Italy) (WWW ’15 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1211–1215. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2741720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Alan M. MacEachren, Anuj Jaiswal, Anthony C. Robinson, Scott Pezanowski, Alexander Savelyev, Prasenjit Mitra, Xiao Zhang, and Justine Blanford. 2011. SensePlace2: GeoTwitter analytics support for situational awareness. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2011.6102456Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sana Malik, Alison Smith, Timothy Hawes, Panagis Papadatos, Jianyu Li, Cody Dunne, and Ben Shneiderman. 2013. TopicFlow: Visualizing topic alignment of Twitter data over time. In 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013). 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2492639Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Myriam Munezero, Calkin Suero Montero, Maxim Mozgovoy, and Erkki Sutinen. 2015. EmoTwitter – A Fine-Grained Visualization System for Identifying Enduring Sentiments in Tweets. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Alexander Gelbukh (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 78–91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vu Dung Nguyen, Blesson Varghese, and Adam Barker. 2013. The Royal Birth of 2013: Analysing and Visualising Public Sentiment in the UK Using Twitter. CoRR abs/1308.1847(2013). arXiv:1308.1847http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1847Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennis Thom, Harald Bosch, Steffen Koch, Michael Wörner, and Thomas Ertl. 2012. Spatiotemporal anomaly detection through visual analysis of geolocated Twitter messages. In 2012 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium. 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis.2012.6183572Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dennis Thom, Robert Krüger, Thomas Ertl, Ulrike Bechstedt, Axel Platz, Julia Zisgen, and Bernd Volland. 2015. Can twitter really save your life? A case study of visual social media analytics for situation awareness. In 2015 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2015.7156376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Franz Wanner, Andreas Weiler, and Tobias Schreck. 2012. Topic Tracker: Shape-based Visualization for Trend and Sentiment Tracking in Twitter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jichang Zhao, Li Dong, Junjie Wu, and Ke Xu. 2012. MoodLens: an emoticon-based sentiment analysis system for chinese tweets. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AVI 2022: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
    June 2022
    414 pages
    ISBN:9781450397193
    DOI:10.1145/3531073

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 June 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format