Khyati Priya
ABSTRACT
The advantages of additive manufacturing technology combined with recent research in material sciences has led to the development of programmable matter- objects that can change their form or function or both in a pre-decided manner based on the user input or the environmental stimuli. Programmable matter is allowing us to develop a new paradigm of interactive and smart products. While these products are functional, they may or may not incorporate cues in their form that conveys information about how to interact with the product – a property termed as perceived affordance. Research on perceived affordances of programmable matter is lacking. We wish to bridge that gap by understanding what perceived affordance means in the context of programmable matter, and how to design products to create better perceived affordances.
- Thomas A. Campbell, Skylar Tibbits, and Banning Garrett. 2014. The Programmable World. Scientific American 311, 5 (Oct. 2014), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1114-60Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M Cima and J Cornie. [n. d.]. Three-Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model. ([n. d.]), 4.Google Scholar
- Atanu Kumar Das, David A. Agar, Magnus Rudolfsson, and Sylvia H. Larsson. 2021. A review on wood powders in 3D printing: processes, properties and potential applications. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 15 (Nov. 2021), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.110Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eleni Economidou and Bart Hengeveld. 2021. No Door Handle, No Entry! Expressing Cues through a Shape-Changing Door. In Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. ACM, Lodz Poland, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447932.3492326Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Nadia Cheng, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2012. Jamming user interfaces: programmable particle stiffness and sensing for malleable and shape-changing devices. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST ’12. ACM Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 519. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380181Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, St. Andrews Scotland, United Kingdom, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501988.2502032Google ScholarDigital Library
- Qi Ge, Amir Hosein Sakhaei, Howon Lee, Conner K. Dunn, Nicholas X. Fang, and Martin L. Dunn. 2016. Multimaterial 4D Printing with Tailorable Shape Memory Polymers. Scientific Reports 6, 1 (Nov. 2016), 31110. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31110Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Gibson. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH), Boston.Google Scholar
- Erik Grönvall, Sofie Kinch, Marianne Graves Petersen, and Majken K. Rasmussen. 2014. Causing commotion with a shape-changing bench: experiencing shape-changing interfaces in use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 2559–2568. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557360Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexandra Ion. 2019. Metamaterial Devices. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Potsdam, Germany. https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/42986/file/ion_diss.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Alexandra Ion, Johannes Frohnhofen, Ludwig Wall, Robert Kovacs, Mirela Alistar, Jack Lindsay, Pedro Lopes, Hsiang-Ting Chen, and Patrick Baudisch. 2016. Metamaterial Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, Tokyo Japan, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984540Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexandra Ion, Robert Kovacs, Oliver S. Schneider, Pedro Lopes, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Metamaterial Textures. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173910Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shi Kai Jing, Guo Hua Song, Ji Hong Liu, Jing Tao Zhou, and He Zhang. 2014. A Review of Product Design for Additive Manufacturing. Applied Mechanics and Materials 635-637 (Sept. 2014), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.635-637.97Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer Loy. [n. d.]. BREAKING THE MOULD: RESPONDING TO THE GROWING IMPACT OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING ON PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION. ([n. d.]), 6.Google Scholar
- Jonathan R. A. Maier and Georges M. Fadel. 2002. Comparing Function and Affordance as Bases for Design. In Volume 4: 14th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Integrated Systems Design, and Engineering Design and Culture. ASMEDC, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2002/DTM-34029Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ken Nakagaki, Sean Follmer, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. LineFORM: Actuated Curve Interfaces for Display, Interaction, and Constraint. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, Charlotte NC USA, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807452Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald A. Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things(rev. and expanded edition ed.). MIT press, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
- Jifei Ou, Zhao Ma, Jannik Peters, Sen Dai, Nikolaos Vlavianos, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2018. KinetiX - designing auxetic-inspired deformable material structures. Computers & Graphics 75 (Oct. 2018), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2018.06.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Paulose, A.S. Meeussen, and V. Vitelli. 2015. Selective buckling via states of self-stress in topological metamaterials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 25 (2015), 7639–7644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502939112Google ScholarCross Ref
- Majken K. Rasmussen, Giovanni M. Troiano, Marianne G. Petersen, Jakob G. Simonsen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Sketching Shape-changing Interfaces: Exploring Vocabulary, Metaphors Use, and Affordances. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 2740–2751. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858183Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dan Raviv, Wei Zhao, Carrie McKnelly, Athina Papadopoulou, Achuta Kadambi, Boxin Shi, Shai Hirsch, Daniel Dikovsky, Michael Zyracki, Carlos Olguin, Ramesh Raskar, and Skylar Tibbits. 2014. Active Printed Materials for Complex Self-Evolving Deformations. Scientific Reports 4, 1 (Dec. 2014), 7422. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07422Google ScholarCross Ref
- David W Rosen. [n. d.]. Design for Additive Manufacturing: A Method to Explore Unexplored Regions of the Design Space. ([n. d.]), 14.Google Scholar
- Anne Roudaut, Abhijit Karnik, Markus Löchtefeld, and Sriram Subramanian. 2013. Morphees: toward high "shape resolution" in self-actuated flexible mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Paris France, 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470738Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. J. Sames, F. A. List, S. Pannala, R. R. Dehoff, and S. S. Babu. 2016. The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. International Materials Reviews 61, 5 (July 2016), 315–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Sydney Gladman, Elisabetta A. Matsumoto, Ralph G. Nuzzo, L. Mahadevan, and Jennifer A. Lewis. 2016. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nature Materials 15, 4 (April 2016), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4544Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Tiab and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Understanding Affordance, System State, and Feedback in Shape-Changing Buttons. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 2752–2763. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858350Google ScholarDigital Library
- Skylar Tibbits. 2014. 4D Printing: Multi-Material Shape Change. Architectural Design 84, 1 (Jan. 2014), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1710Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nahum Travitzky, Alexander Bonet, Benjamin Dermeik, Tobias Fey, Ina Filbert-Demut, Lorenz Schlier, Tobias Schlordt, and Peter Greil. 2014. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramic-Based Materials: Additive Manufacturing of Ceramic-Based Materials. Advanced Engineering Materials 16, 6 (June 2014), 729–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201400097Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anke van Oosterhout and Eve Hoggan. 2021. Deformation Techniques for Shape Changing Interfaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451622Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guanyun Wang, Ye Tao, Ozguc Bertug Capunaman, Humphrey Yang, and Lining Yao. 2019. A-line: 4D Printing Morphing Linear Composite Structures. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300656Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wen Wang, Lining Yao, Chin-Yi Cheng, Teng Zhang, Hiroshi Atsumi, Luda Wang, Guanyun Wang, Oksana Anilionyte, Helene Steiner, Jifei Ou, Kang Zhou, Chris Wawrousek, Katherine Petrecca, Angela M. Belcher, Rohit Karnik, Xuanhe Zhao, Daniel I. C. Wang, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2017. Harnessing the hygroscopic and biofluorescent behaviors of genetically tractable microbial cells to design biohybrid wearables. Science Advances 3, 5 (May 2017), e1601984. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601984Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Perceived Affordances in Programmable Matter
Recommendations
Affordances of Shape-Changing Interfaces: An Information Perspective on Transformability and Movement
DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceAffordances is an important term in the field of Shape-Changing Interfaces (SCI). But the field is challenged by a multitude of vaguely defined concepts around affordances such as dynamic, spatial, or tactile affordances. In line with this, Alexander et ...
Exploring Visual Signifier Characteristics to Improve the Perception of Affordances of In-Place Touch Inputs
MHCITouch screens supporting different inputs such as 'Tap', 'Dwell', 'Double Tap' and 'Force Press' are omnipresent in modern devices and yet this variety of interaction opportunities is rarely communicated to the user. Without visual signifiers, these ...
Programmable matter with self-reconfiguring robots
CF '10: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Computing frontiersProgrammable matter aims to bring machines and materials closer together. We wish to create smart materials whose properties can be programmed, or, alternatively, machines that look and feel more like materials. Programmable matter will be achieved when ...
Comments