skip to main content
10.1145/3532724.3535591acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

A Focused Animation Curriculum Model

Published:26 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

We offer this curriculum as a model for a focused animation program that does not require the infrastructure of an animation major, multiple instructors, or many courses. Students who have taken two courses are well-prepared for technical director positions. Many students report this experience as a college highlight.

The success of the program is due to several key practices. Group critiques mimic “dailies” in industry and allow students to improve work in progress. Students are motivated to learn animation basics when they are applied to a final short film. We emphasize problem-solving over recipe-following so students become self-sufficient in learning new techniques. We provide a supportive and enthusiastic structure through in-class activities, TA support, and a well-attended final showcase. We discuss these principles along with course aims and lessons learned as we refined our approach.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Meier_gensub_180.mp4

mp4

185.4 MB

3532724.3535591.mp4

mp4

787.1 MB

References

  1. Peter Comninos, Leigh McLoughlin, and Eike Falk Anderson. 2009. Educating Technophile Artists: Experiences from a Highly Successful Computer Animation Undergraduate Programme. In ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2009 Educators Program(SIGGRAPH ASIA ’09). ACM, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/1666611.1666612Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. David S. Ebert and Dan Bailey. 2000. A Collaborative and Interdisciplinary Computer Animation Course. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 34, 3 (aug 2000), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/359293.359325Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Edmund B. Feldman. 1994. Practical Art Criticism. PrenticeHall, Englewood, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jesse Polhemus. 2017. Toymaker. Conduit 27(2017), 4–10. https://bit.ly/ConduitTMGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGGRAPH '22: ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Educator's Forum
    July 2022
    314 pages
    ISBN:9781450393669
    DOI:10.1145/3532724

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 July 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGGRAPH '24
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format