skip to main content
10.1145/3533254.3533257acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ADME prediction for Breast Cancer Drugs in Computer-Aided Drug Design

Published:06 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

ERα plays an important role in breast tumor development and is regarded as an important target for breast cancer treatment. In order to assist the drug design for breast cancer target ERα, a machine learning method named Adaptive Boosting Extremely Random Tree (ABERT) is proposed in this paper, which is applied to construct the prediction model for the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of candidate compounds. Moreover, traditional machine learning and deep learning models are used to compare and reveal the advantages of our model. Besides, an external data set is used to verify the accuracy and stability of our model. The results show that our model has high accuracy in predicting ADME properties and can help to study the pharmacokinetics of candidate drugs as well as the Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD) in early drug discovery for breast cancer.

References

  1. Huang, B., Omoto, Y., Iwase, H., 2014. Differential expression of estrogen receptor α, β1, and β2 in lobular and ductal breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 1933-1938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Zhang, X.T., Kang, L.G., Ding, L., 2011. A positive feedback loop of ER-α36/EGFR promotes malignant growth of ER-negative breast cancer cells. Oncogene 30, 770-780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ding, J., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., 2019. Inhibition of BTF3 sensitizes luminal breast cancer cells to PI3Kα inhibition through the transcriptional regulation of ERα. Cancer Letters 440-441, 54-63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wong, C.H., Siah, K.W. AND Lo, A.W. 2018. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics 20, 273-286.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Li, A.P. 2001. Screening for human ADME/Tox drug properties in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 6, 357-366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Singh, S.S. 2006. Preclinical pharmacokinetics: an approach towards safer and efficacious drugs. Current Drug Metabolism 7, 165-182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Masimirembwa, C.M., Bredberg, U. AND Andersson, T.B. 2003. Metabolic Stability for Drug Discovery and Development: Pharmacokinetic and Biochemical Challenges. Clinical Pharmacokinetics 42, 515-543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kuppens, I.E.L.M., Breedveld, P., Beijnen, J.H., 2009. Modulation of Oral Drug Bioavailability: From Preclinical Mechanism to Therapeutic Application. Cancer Investigation 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaitin, K.I. 2008. Obstacles and opportunities in new drug development. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 83, 210-212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fuqiang, Ban, Kush, 2017. Best Practices of Computer-Aided Drug Discovery: Lessons Learned from the Development of a Preclinical Candidate for Prostate Cancer with a New Mechanism of Action. J.Chem.Inf.Model 57, 1018-1028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chuang, K.V., Gunsalus, L.M. AND Keiser, M.J. 2020. Learning Molecular Representations for Medicinal Chemistry. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 63, 8705-8722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jie, D., Wang, N.N., Yao, Z.J., 2018. ADMETlab: a platform for systematic ADMET evaluation based on a comprehensively collected ADMET database. Journal of Cheminformatics 10, 29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Pires, D., Blundell, T.L. AND Ascher, D.B. 2015. pkCSM: Predicting Small-Molecule Pharmacokinetic and Toxicity Properties Using Graph-Based Signatures. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 58, 4066-4072.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Schneckener, S., Grimbs, S., Hey, J., 2019. Prediction of Oral Bioavailability in Rats: Transferring Insights from in Vitro Correlations to (Deep) Machine Learning Models Using in Silico Model Outputs and Chemical Structure Parameters. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 59, 4893-4905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Shi, T., Yang, Y., Huang, S., 2019. Molecular image-based convolutional neural network for the prediction of ADMET properties. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 194, 103853.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ma, J., Sheridan, R.P., Liaw, A., 2015. Deep Neural Nets as a Method for Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling 55, 263-274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yun, T., Liu, G., Li, W., 2013. In Silico ADMET Prediction: Recent Advances, Current Challenges and Future Trends. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 13, 1273-1289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gleeson, M.P., Modi, S., Bender, A., 2012. The Challenges Involved in Modeling Toxicity Data In Silico: A Review. Current Pharmaceutical Design 18, 1266-1291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Merlot, C. 2010. Computational toxicology—a tool for early safety evaluation. Drug Discovery Today 15, 16-22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jiang, D., Lei, T., Wang, Z., 2020. ADMET evaluation in drug discovery. 20. Prediction of breast cancer resistance protein inhibition through machine learning. Journal of Cheminformatics 12, 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Geurts, P., Ernst, D. AND Wehenkel, L. 2006. Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning 63, 3-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mitchell, T.M. 1997. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill Education.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IEEA '22: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications
    March 2022
    85 pages
    ISBN:9781450395830
    DOI:10.1145/3533254

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format