skip to main content
10.1145/3533254.3533264acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving Office Building Energy Performance Using Phase Change Material in Building Envelope

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Buildings consume a substantial energy to maintain thermal requirements for occupants, it's one of the factors that contribute to climate change. Recent scientific research suggests that merging phase change material (PCM) inside the architecture envelope can reduce cooling load. The current study looks on the capability of PCM to reduce building cooling requirement in hot desert climates. The paper methodology covers a detailed evaluation of thermal energy of an office site using Design builder, demonstrating how much energy can be saved by using PCM in the building envelope compared with nominal Egyptian building envelope. Leading to HVAC sizing capacity reduction around 13% and annual electrical consumption reduction around 6 MWh.

References

  1. T. B. Johansson, A. Patwardhan, N. Nakicenovic, and L. Gomez-Echeverri, “Global energy assessment (GEA),” Cambridge Univ. Press, vol. 50, no. 08, p. 1865, 2012, doi: 10.5860/choice.50-4462.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Egyptian Electricity Holding Company, “Annual Report of the Egyptian Electricity Holding Company2019/2020.” 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. Brock, Designing the exterior wall: an architectural guide to the vertical envelope. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Zain, M. N. Taib, and S. M. S. Baki, “Hot and humid climate: prospect for thermal comfort in residential building,” Desalination, vol. 209, no. 1-3 SPEC. ISS., pp. 261–268, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. P. Lotfabadi and P. Hançer, “A comparative study of traditional and contemporary building envelope construction techniques in terms of thermal comfort and energy efficiency in hot and humid climates,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 13, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Saafi and N. Daouas, “Energy and cost efficiency of phase change materials integrated in building envelopes under Tunisia Mediterranean climate,” Energy, vol. 187, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. D. Zwanzig, Y. Lian, and E. G. Brehob, “Numerical simulation of phase change material composite wallboard in a multi-layered building envelope,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 69, pp. 27–40, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K. O. Lee, M. A. Medina, X. Sun, and X. Jin, “Thermal performance of phase change materials (PCM)-enhanced cellulose insulation in passive solar residential building walls,” Sol. Energy, vol. 163, no. January, pp. 113–121, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. H. Ye, L. Long, H. Zhang, and R. Zou, “The performance evaluation of shape-stabilized phase change materials in building applications using energy saving index,” Appl. Energy, vol. 113, pp. 1118–1126, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Ibáñez, A. Lázaro, B. Zalba, and L. F. Cabeza, “An approach to the simulation of PCMs in building applications using TRNSYS,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 25, no. 11–12, pp. 1796–1807, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Kosny, E. Kossecka, A. Brzezinski, A. Tleoubaev, and D. Yarbrough, “Dynamic thermal performance analysis of fiber insulations containing bio-based phase change materials (PCMs),” Energy Build., vol. 52, pp. 122–131, 2012,Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Lagou, A. Kylili, J. Šadauskienė, and P. A. Fokaides, “Numerical investigation of phase change materials (PCM) optimal melting properties and position in building elements under diverse conditions,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 225, pp. 452–464, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.07.199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. SHRAE, “No Title.” http://ashrae-meteo.info/index.php?lat=30.122&lng=31.406&place=’’&wmo=623660&si_ip=SI&ashrae_version=2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. A. William, A. M. Elharidi, A. A. Hanafy, A. Attia, and M. Elhelw, “Energy-efficient retrofitting strategies for healthcare facilities in hot-humid climate: Parametric and economical analysis,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 4549–4562, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IEEA '22: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications
    March 2022
    85 pages
    ISBN:9781450395830
    DOI:10.1145/3533254

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format