skip to main content
10.1145/3535227.3535236acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfablearnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Mind-and Makerspace: Impact evaluation of a university makerspace and the development of an impact measurement methodology

Published:17 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present an ongoing research project aimed at evaluating the impact of the Mind- and Makerspace (MaM) in Bruges, Belgium. The MaM is envisioned as an open space where students, schools, social organizations, entrepreneurs, companies and citizens are stimulated to develop a creative, exploratory and entrepreneurial attitude to contribute to a sustainable society. To achieve these objectives the MaM offers infrastructure, network, knowledge, methodologies and coaching. The MaM was founded by Howest University of Applied Sciences and intended as an open education system, aiming to detect and empower talents of any individual. The main goal of this impact research is to investigate whether the approach works, under what circumstances and what change it brings for its users and partners. This research project aims to contribute to an accessible impact measurement methodology as well, that can be used by other social entrepreneurs.

References

  1. Omar Mohout and Kaat Peeters. 2020. Leaving a legacy: increase your social impact. Die Keure, Antwerpen, Belgium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. John A. McLaughin and Jordan B. Gretchen. 2015. Using Logic Models. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (4th. Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Impactpad. 2018. The Impact Path: An entrepreneur's guide to growth in social impact measurement. Retrieved from http://impactpad.nl/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Claudia van Orden, Malissa Irosemito and Francine Teesink. 2019. Wat breng je in beeld als maatschappelijke impact? Sociaal bestek 81, 2 (June 2019),38-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41196-019-0027-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Shannon Mersand. 2020. The state of Makerspace Research: a Review of the Literature. TechTrends 65, 2 (March 2021),174 – 186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00566-5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Oliver Stickel, Melanie Stilz, Anke Brocker, Jan Borchers and Volkmar Pipek. 2019. Fab:UNIverse - Makerspaces, Fab Labs and Lab Managers in Academia. In Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference (FabLearn Europe '19), May 29-29, 2019, Oulu, Finland. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 19, 1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335074Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Heidi Hartikainen, Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Marianne Kinnula and Netta Livari. 2021. Entrepreneurship Education Meets FabLab: Lessons Learned with Teenagers. In FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021 - An International Conference on Computing, Design and Making in Education (FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021), June 02-03, 2021, St.Gallen, Switzerland. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3466725.3466727Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. 2019. Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. DOI: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/291008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Riina Vuorikari, Anusca Ferrarin and Yves Punie. 2019. Makerspaces for Education and Training: Exploring future implications for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. DOI: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/946996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andreia Inamorato dos Santos, Yves Punie and Jonatan Castaño Muñoz. 2017. Opening up Education: support framework for higher education institutions. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. DOI: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/293408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Madison E. Andrews, Maura Borrego and Audrey Boklage. 2021. Self-efficacy and belonging: The impact of a University Makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education 8, 1 (June 2021). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Francesca Fiore, Alberto Montresor and Maurizio Marchese. 2021. A Maker Approach For The Future Of Learning. In FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021 - An International Conference on Computing, Design and Making in Education (FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2021), June 2–3, 2021, St. Gallen, Switzerland. ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 4 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3466725.3466761Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kolja Oswald and Xiaokang Zhao. 2021. Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces: A Grounded Theory of the Role of Collaborative Learning in Makerspaces. SAGE Open 11, 2 (April 2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211020732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Veerle Ernalsteen and Annelies Joos. 2010. Wat is een Brede School? Een referentiekader. Steunpunt diversiteit en leren, Gent, Belgium. Retreived from https://diversiteitenleren.be/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Marc Stickdorn, Markus E. Hormess, Adam Lawrence and Jakob Schneider. 2018. This is service design doing: applying service design thinking in the real world. O'Reilly Media Inc, Sebastopol, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    FabLearn Europe / MakeEd 2022: 6th FabLearn Europe / MakeEd Conference 2022
    May 2022
    117 pages
    ISBN:9781450396332
    DOI:10.1145/3535227

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 June 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate14of35submissions,40%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format