skip to main content
10.1145/3535756.3535764acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicettConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Empirical Study on The Correlation Between College Students' Self-Management Ability and Online Learning Effectiveness: ——A comparison based on Mainland China and Macao

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the popularity of online training mode, students' online learning effectiveness has been widely concerned by educational practitioners and scholars. From the perspective of college students' self-management ability, this study discussed the correlation between self-management ability and online learning effectiveness. It adopted the method of questionnaire survey in empirical research, with students from universities in mainland China and Macao as samples. Analysis of the questionnaire results shows that there is a positive correlation between them, but the correlation between mainland universities is stronger than it in Macao. According to the research results, this paper analyzed the reasons for the correlation differences and puts forward some suggestions to improve the self-management ability of college students.

References

  1. Yue Zhu, Jia Hua Zhang, Wing Au and Greg Yates. 2020. University students’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online course: a self-regulated learning perspective. Educational technology research and development. 68, 3 (March 2020), 1485-1519.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ryan Brydges, Parvathy Nair, Irene Ma, David Shanks and Rose Hatala. 2012. Directed self‐regulated learning versus instructor‐regulated learning in simulation training. Medical education. 46, 7 (June 2012), 648-656.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hongfeng Zhang, Johnny F. I. Lam, and Shaodan Su. 2021. A Qualitative Research on the Online Learning Experiences of College Students in Macao during the Pandemic. In 2021 5th International Conference on Education and E-Learning (ICEEL 2021), November 05-07, 2021, Virtual Event, Japan. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Albert Bandura. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman and Co.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jiao Jianli, Zhou Xiaoqing and Chen Zexuan. 2020. Case study on online teaching of "on-campus suspension" in the context of epidemic prevention and control. China Educational Technology. 3 (March 2020), 106-113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang Yanling and Xu Tong. 2014. Application and practice of learning effectiveness Pyramid Theory in flipped classroom. China Educational Technology. 7 (July 2014), 133-138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Li Yan, Duan Yanqing, Fu Zetian, and Alford Philip. 2011. An empirical study on behavioral intention to reuse e-Learning systems in rural China. British Journal of Educational Technology. 43 (December 2011), 933–948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang Chengyao. 2013. Application and practice of learning effectiveness Pyramid theory in information technology classroom of primary and secondary schools. China Educational Technology. 10 (October 2013), 125-127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai Ruichang, Wang Quanzhou, Xu Jiangjun and Zhou Longjun. 2020. Effectiveness of students’ self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Insigt. 34, 1 (June 2020), 175-182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniel Lourenco and Aristides I. Ferreira. 2019. Self‐regulated learning and training effectiveness. International Journal of Training and Development. 23, 2 (May 2019), 117-134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu Yi. and Zhang Huirong. 2020. A Survey of online teaching in colleges and universities. Chongqing Higher Education Research. 8, 5 (September 2020), 66-78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Moon-Heum Cho and Demei Shen. 2013. Self-regulation in online learning. Distance education. 34, 3 (December 2012), 290-301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Macao Higher Education Bureau. Statistical report of "Three-year Employment Tracking Survey of Macao College Students after graduation" in 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2021 from https://portal.dsedj.gov.mo/webdsejspace/internet/Inter_main_page.jspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Su Shaodan, Zhang Hongfeng, and Lv Huan. 2021. The Research on the Social Participation in Higher Education Governance in Macao. In 2021 5th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education (ICDTE 2021), September 15–17, 2021, Busan, Republic of Korea. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Doo H. Lim, Michael Lane Morris and Seung-Won Yoon. 2006. Instructional and Learner Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within Online Learning Environment. Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference. AHRD, St. Paul, U.S. 972-979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chih-Hsuan Wang, David M. Shannon and Margaret E. Ross. 2013. Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education. 34, 3 (September 2013), 302-323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pu-Shih Daniel Chen, Amber D. Lambert, Kevin R. Guidry. 2010. Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education. 54, 4 (May 2010), 1222-1232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yan Xiao and Li Bing. 2019. Thinking on the model of college system in the University of Macau. Education Modernization. 11, 93 (November 2019), 63-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yu Shengquan and Wang Huimin. 2020. How to better organize online learning in epidemic and other extreme environments. China Educational Technology. 400 (May 2020), 6-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICETT '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies
    April 2022
    149 pages
    ISBN:9781450396974
    DOI:10.1145/3535756

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format