skip to main content
10.1145/3535782.3535810acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identifying Customer Needs for a Master's Degree Program in Industrial Engineering: A Case Study from Prospective Students’ Insights

Published:18 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Customer satisfaction has become a key factor in strategic work of many institutions towards the increasing competition regarding student recruitment. This paper presents a systematic approach to identify customer needs for a Master's Degree Program in Industrial Engineering based on target students’ needs in the view of new product development. The approach consists of two methods: Choice-based conjoint analysis and Kano's Model. Conjoint analysis is used to explore important scores of each attribute of the program, i.e., specialist concentration, teaching period, research type, program language, teaching format, and tuition fee. Also, the popularity of levels in each attribute are identified. Results from conjoint analysis indicate that the most preferred master curriculum is a program of Business Data Analytics concentration, English language, full-time, hybrid of online and onsite, independence study research type, and tuition fees of 63,500 Baht. Other attributes such as interdisciplinary, joint program, work experience requirement and group (with presence/absence option) are analyzed by Kano's model to identify their category. This research contributes in the literature as a pioneer in applying these two methods to gain customer perception insights about new Master's curriculum development for education industry.

References

  1. Z. Sari, “A new curriculum for manufacturing & industrial engineering and engineering management for BS and MS degrees,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 102, pp. 560-567, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. D. B. Merle Crawford, "New Product Management," McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. H. Gustafsson, Andreas Huber,Frank "Conjoint Measurement Methods and Application," Springer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C.-H. Wang, and C.-W. Wu, “Combining conjoint analysis with Kano model to optimize product varieties of smart phones: A VIKOR perspective,” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 177-186, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Ivy, “A new higher education marketing mix: the 7Ps for MBA marketing,” International Journal of educational management, pp. 288-299, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. Pukcarnon, “An Application of Quality Function Deployment Technique in Curriculum Design and Development for Industrial Engineering Department, Chulalongkorn University,” Department of Industrial Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Rizzo, W. Harwood, and M. Drake, “Consumer desires and perceptions of lactose-free milk,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 6950-6966, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Popovic, M. Kuzmanović, and G. Savić, “A comparative empirical study of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Conjoint analysis: Literature review,” Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. H. Shinno, H. Yoshioka, S. Marpaung , “Quantitative SWOT analysis on global competitiveness of machine tool industry,” Journal of engineering design, vol. 17, no. 03, pp. 251-258, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Pérez-Troncoso, “A step-by-step guide to design, implement, and analyze a discrete choice experiment,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.11235, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Anand, G. Bansal, and D. Aggrawal, “Choice based diffusion model for predicting sales of mobile phones using conjoint analysis,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 216-226, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. D. Raghavarao, J. B. Wiley, and P. Chitturi, "Choice-based Conjoint Analysis," Models and Designs (1st ed.). Boca Raton: Taylor and Frances Group, CRC Press 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Hille, S. Weber, and T. Brosch, “Consumers’ preferences for electricity-saving programs: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint study,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 220, pp. 800-815, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. F. Traets, D. G. Sanchez, and M. Vandebroek, “Generating optimal designs for discrete choice experiments in R: the Idefix package,” Journal Of Statistical Software, vol. 96, pp. 1-41, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. B. K. Orme, Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategics for Product Design and Pricing Research: LLC Research, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Wongpoj, “Important Factors for Students' Decision Making to Study in Graduate Programs and Guidelines in Increasing the Numbers of Graduate Students at Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai Campus,” Master of Education in Educational Administration, Prince of Songkla University, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. S. Wiklund, and H. Wiklund, “Student focused design and improvement of university courses,” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, pp. 434-443, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MSIE '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
    April 2022
    497 pages
    ISBN:9781450395816
    DOI:10.1145/3535782

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format