ABSTRACT
Customer satisfaction has become a key factor in strategic work of many institutions towards the increasing competition regarding student recruitment. This paper presents a systematic approach to identify customer needs for a Master's Degree Program in Industrial Engineering based on target students’ needs in the view of new product development. The approach consists of two methods: Choice-based conjoint analysis and Kano's Model. Conjoint analysis is used to explore important scores of each attribute of the program, i.e., specialist concentration, teaching period, research type, program language, teaching format, and tuition fee. Also, the popularity of levels in each attribute are identified. Results from conjoint analysis indicate that the most preferred master curriculum is a program of Business Data Analytics concentration, English language, full-time, hybrid of online and onsite, independence study research type, and tuition fees of 63,500 Baht. Other attributes such as interdisciplinary, joint program, work experience requirement and group (with presence/absence option) are analyzed by Kano's model to identify their category. This research contributes in the literature as a pioneer in applying these two methods to gain customer perception insights about new Master's curriculum development for education industry.
- Z. Sari, “A new curriculum for manufacturing & industrial engineering and engineering management for BS and MS degrees,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 102, pp. 560-567, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. D. B. Merle Crawford, "New Product Management," McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010.Google Scholar
- A. H. Gustafsson, Andreas Huber,Frank "Conjoint Measurement Methods and Application," Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
- C.-H. Wang, and C.-W. Wu, “Combining conjoint analysis with Kano model to optimize product varieties of smart phones: A VIKOR perspective,” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 177-186, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Ivy, “A new higher education marketing mix: the 7Ps for MBA marketing,” International Journal of educational management, pp. 288-299, 2008.Google Scholar
- V. Pukcarnon, “An Application of Quality Function Deployment Technique in Curriculum Design and Development for Industrial Engineering Department, Chulalongkorn University,” Department of Industrial Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, 2003.Google Scholar
- P. Rizzo, W. Harwood, and M. Drake, “Consumer desires and perceptions of lactose-free milk,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 6950-6966, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Popovic, M. Kuzmanović, and G. Savić, “A comparative empirical study of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Conjoint analysis: Literature review,” Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 153-163, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Shinno, H. Yoshioka, S. Marpaung , “Quantitative SWOT analysis on global competitiveness of machine tool industry,” Journal of engineering design, vol. 17, no. 03, pp. 251-258, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Pérez-Troncoso, “A step-by-step guide to design, implement, and analyze a discrete choice experiment,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.11235, 2020.Google Scholar
- A. Anand, G. Bansal, and D. Aggrawal, “Choice based diffusion model for predicting sales of mobile phones using conjoint analysis,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 216-226, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Raghavarao, J. B. Wiley, and P. Chitturi, "Choice-based Conjoint Analysis," Models and Designs (1st ed.). Boca Raton: Taylor and Frances Group, CRC Press 2011.Google Scholar
- S. Hille, S. Weber, and T. Brosch, “Consumers’ preferences for electricity-saving programs: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint study,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 220, pp. 800-815, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Traets, D. G. Sanchez, and M. Vandebroek, “Generating optimal designs for discrete choice experiments in R: the Idefix package,” Journal Of Statistical Software, vol. 96, pp. 1-41, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. K. Orme, Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategics for Product Design and Pricing Research: LLC Research, 2010.Google Scholar
- P. Wongpoj, “Important Factors for Students' Decision Making to Study in Graduate Programs and Guidelines in Increasing the Numbers of Graduate Students at Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai Campus,” Master of Education in Educational Administration, Prince of Songkla University, 2016.Google Scholar
- P. S. Wiklund, and H. Wiklund, “Student focused design and improvement of university courses,” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, pp. 434-443, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
A graduate master's prerequisite program
This paper describes a separate, one-year, graduate level program designed primarily for students with a non-computer science baccalaureate degree. The program serves as preparation for our Master's degree in computer science. Programs designed for such ...
A master's degree in school computer studies
SIGCSE '83: Proceedings of the fourteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science educationSeveral papers have been written about the shortage of knowledgeable computer science teachers at the secondary and junior college level. Additional reports have been written describing workshops, courses, and various other methods to help reduce this ...
A master's degree in school computer studies
Proceedings of the 14th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science educationSeveral papers have been written about the shortage of knowledgeable computer science teachers at the secondary and junior college level. Additional reports have been written describing workshops, courses, and various other methods to help reduce this ...
Comments