skip to main content
10.1145/3535782.3535820acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Public Bathroom Design Guidelines for Elderly Women in Nursing Homes Based on Anthropometric Approach

Published:18 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Aging population is currently rising in the world, where the elderly population exceeds 7 percent of the total population. Elderly population, those who have reached the age of 60 or above, are continually increasing from year to year, which occurs globally, including in Indonesia. In general, elderly experience changes in their physical conditions, one of them is instability or falls. There are several studies stated that falls are one of the main causes of death due to accidents among the elderly and most likely happens in home environment, especially bathrooms. Previous studies conducted in several countries that studied about elderly friendly bathroom are found. However, research related to bathroom design for elderly in Indonesia is still considerably limited. This research aims to produce public bathroom design guidelines for elderly women based on anthropometric considerations. Posture analysis using RULA, LBA, and OWAS are performed to evaluate the design guidelines. The posture evaluation results show that all postures when conducting several activities in the bathroom are acceptable, thus it can be concluded that the public bathroom design guidelines are suitable to be used by Indonesian elderly women. The results of this research are expected to be a guide for designing elderly-friendly public bathroom, especially for older women, that can be implemented in nursing homes in Indonesia.

References

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik, “Statistik Penduduk Lanjut Usia,” 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Dekker, S. N. Buzink, J. F. M. Molenbroek, and R. de Bruin, “Hand supports to assist toilet use among the elderly,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. S. Jones, C. L. Dunn, D. S. Wu, J. C. Joseph, D. Kile, and T. N. Robinson, “Relationship between asking an older adult about falls and surgical outcomes,” JAMA Surg., vol. 148, no. 12, pp. 1132–1138, 2013, doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. T. Rosen, K. A. Mack, and R. K. Noonan, “Slipping and tripping: fall injuries in adults associated with rugs and carpets,” J. Inj. Violence Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 2013, doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i1.177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. World Health Organization, “Falls,” World Health Organization, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls. [Accessed: 06-Jun-2021].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. U. Y. Yeong, S. Y. Tan, J. F. Yap, and W. Y. Choo, “Prevalence of falls among community-dwelling elderly and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study in Perak, Malaysia,” Malaysian Fam. Physician, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Sahril, T. Aris, and A. Roslinah, “Home injury among elderly population in Malaysia,” Int. J. Curr. Res., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 38820–38824, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. H. Lim , “Risk factors of home injury among elderly people in Malaysia,” Asian J. Gerontol. Geriatr., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. R. Gale, L. D. Westbury, C. Cooper, and E. M. Dennison, “Risk factors for incident falls in older men and women: The English longitudinal study of ageing,” BMC Geriatr., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0806-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. V. C. Chang and M. T. Do, “Risk factors for falls among seniors: Implications of gender,” Am. J. Epidemiol., vol. 181, no. 7, pp. 521–531, 2015, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. World Health Organization, “World report and Ageing on Health,” 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. M. Cawthon, “Gender differences in osteoporosis and fractures,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., vol. 469, no. 7, pp. 1900–1905, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1780-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. World Health Organization, “WHO Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age,” 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. Kaewdok, S. Sirisawasd, S. Norkaew, and S. Taptagaporn, “Application of anthropometric data for elderly-friendly home and facility design in Thailand,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 80, no. September, p. 103037, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. H. Romli, M. P. Tan, L. Mackenzie, M. Lovarini, P. Suttanon, and L. Clemson, “Falls amongst older people in Southeast Asia: a scoping review,” Public Health, vol. 145, pp. 96–112, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.035.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. I. H. Susilowati, B. P. Hasiholan, and C. Satrya, “Environmental hazards in elderly nursing homes in Jakarta, Indonesia,” ASM Sci. J., vol. 13, no. Specialissue5, pp. 142–148, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. A. Stevens, J. E. Mahoney, and H. Ehrenreich, “Circumstances and outcomes of falls among high risk community-dwelling older adults,” Inj. Epidemiol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2014, doi: 10.1186/2197-1714-1-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. Han, D. Shao, and Y. X. Wang, “Design of senior family bathroom system based on demand theory,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 179, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202017902080.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. D. Wang, J. Wu, and Q. Lin, “A novel method for designing and optimizing the layout of facilities in bathroom for the elderly in home-based rehabilitation,” Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 333–341, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1319426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Afifi, M. Al-Hussein, and A. Bouferguene, “Geriatric bathroom design to minimize risk of falling for older adults- A systematic review,” Eur. Geriatr. Med., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 598–603, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2015.05.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. Rashid, M. Hussain, R. Yusuff, and S. Norazizan Syed Abd Rashid, “Designing homes for the elderly based on the anthropometry of older Malaysians,” Asian J Gerontol Geriatr Asian J. Gerontol. Geriatr., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 75–83, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. J. Kennedy, A. Arcelus, P. Guitard, R. A. Goubran, and H. Sveistrup, “Toilet grab-bar preference and center of pressure deviation during toilet transfers in healthy seniors, seniors with hip replacements, and seniors having suffered a stroke,” Assist. Technol., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10400435.2014.976799.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M. S. Nagananda , “Design and pragmatic studies of bathroom for elderly people in India,” WSEAS Trans. Biol. Biomed., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 287–305, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Annisa Arista and B. Muhamad Iqbal, “Designing an Ergonomic Bathroom for Elderly,” PervasiveHealth Pervasive Comput. Technol. Healthc., pp. 208–214, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3429551.3429574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. R. Octavia and S. Gunawan, “Participatory Redesign of Bathrooms for Elderly People Living in Indonesian Retirement Homes,” in 3rd South East Asia Network of Ergonomics Society International Conference, Singapore, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. N. Rahmawati, A. Widyanti, and B. C. Jiang, “Daily life, anthropometry and bedroom design of Indonesian elderly,” J. Access. Des. All, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 161–179, 2020, doi: 10.17411/jacces.v10i1.217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. B. P. Hasiholan, I. H. Susilowati, and C. Satrya, “The conformity of anthropometric measurements of bathroom and bedroom designs for independent elderly at panti sosial tresna werdha (PSTW)* Budi mulia i Jakarta in 2018,” J. Access. Des. All, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2019, doi: 10.17411/jacces.v9i1.200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Hartono, “Indonesian anthropometry update for special populations incorporating Drillis and Contini revisited,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 64, pp. 89–101, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. J. P. Higgins, T. Li, and J. J. Deeks, Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect, 2nd Editio. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. J. F. M. Molenbroek and R. De Bruin, “Anthropometrical aspects of a friendly rest room,” Assist. technol. Res. Ser., vol. 27, no. January, pp. 228–241, 2011, doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-752-9-228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Penn State Eberly College of Science, “Bootstrapping,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat555/node/119/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C. Y. Wang and D. C. Cai, “Hand tool handle design based on hand measurements,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 119, pp. 1–5, 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201711901044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. F. Rebelo and M. Soares, Advances in Ergonomics In Design, Usability & Special Populations: Part II. AHFE Conference, 2014, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Scooms, “Towel size guide.” [Online]. Available: https://scooms.com/blogs/towels/towel-size-guide.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Schiesser, “Shower Towels.” [Online]. Available: https://www.schiesser.com/en/living-towels-shower-towels/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bathrobe Depot, “The Ultimate Towel Size Chart to Help You Buy The Best Towels,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.bathrobedepot.com/blogs/guides/the-ultimate-towel-size-chart.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. National Kitchen & Bath Association, “Bathroom Planning Guidelines,” 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MSIE '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
    April 2022
    497 pages
    ISBN:9781450395816
    DOI:10.1145/3535782

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format