skip to main content
10.1145/3536221.3557031acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Real-time Feedback for Developing Conversation Literacy

Published:07 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Learning Analytics (LA) has exploded with the growth in Machine Learning applications. LA, while not new, is always changing, and now allows for automated analyses that used to seem impossible. There is still a need for real-time systems while also centering the design around students and data. By using multiple data streams to provide real-time Learning Analytics, this paper aims to describe a plan for creating a system that aids teachers managing classes and improve the collaboration literacy of students while taking into account ethical, privacy, and user concerns. By surveying and engaging with students and teachers, general guidelines in terms of ethics and privacy in LA will be designed. Along with the data, there will be a way to best present this information in a useful and engaging method to students and teachers that would be determined through studies on the efficacy of different User Interfaces (UIs) and data views along with the surveying.

References

  1. Khalil J. Anderson, Theodore Dubiel, Kenji Tanaka, Marcelo Worsley, Cody Poultney, and Steve Brenneman. 2019. Chemistry Pods: A Mutlimodal Real Time and Retrospective Tool for the Classroom. In 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction(ICMI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 506–507. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340555.3358662Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Marilyn Binkley, Ola Erstad, Joan Herman, Senta Raizen, Martin Ripley, May Miller-Ricci, and Mike Rumble. 2012. Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, Patrick Griffin, Barry McGaw, and Esther Care (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 17–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sigrid Blömeke, Jan-Eric Gustafsson, and Richard J. Shavelson. 2015. Beyond Dichotomies: Competence Viewed as a Continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223, 1 (Jan. 2015), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Maurice Boothe, Collin Yu, Armanda Lewis, and Xavier Ochoa. 2022. Towards a Pragmatic and Theory-Driven Framework for Multimodal Collaboration Feedback. In LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. ACM, Online USA, 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506898Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Maurice Boothe Jr, Collin Yu, and Xavier Ochoa. 2021. Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Tool: A Pragmatic Framework for Multimodal Collaboration Feedback.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. David J Deming. [n. d.]. The Value of Soft Skills in the Labor Market. ([n. d.]), 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vanessa Echeverria, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Xavier Ochoa, and Katherine Chiluiza. 2022. An Exploratory Evaluation of a Collaboration Feedback Report. In LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference(LAK22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1145/3506860.3506890Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Theodoros Giannakopoulos. 2015. pyAudioAnalysis: An Open-Source Python Library for Audio Signal Analysis. PLOS ONE 10, 12 (Dec. 2015), e0144610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144610Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Marcela Hernández-de Menéndez, Ruben Morales-Menendez, Carlos A. Escobar, and Ricardo A. Ramírez Mendoza. 2022. Learning analytics: state of the art. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) (June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00930-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Anna Kruse and Rob Pongsajapan. [n. d.]. Student-Centered Learning Analytics. ([n. d.]), 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. E. Lai. 2011. Collaboration: A Literature Review. undefined (2011). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Collaboration%3A-A-Literature-Review-Lai/85daa93241a0a7f307e4d5aa742ce238d5e31b8fGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. James Pennebaker, Roger Booth, Ryan Boyd, and Martha Francis. 2015. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sambit Praharaj, Maren Scheffel, Hendrik Drachsler, and Marcus Specht. 2021. Literature Review on Co-Located Collaboration Modeling Using Multimodal Learning Analytics—Can We Go the Whole Nine Yards?IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 14, 3 (June 2021), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3097766 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Radim Rehurek and Petr Sojka. 2011. Gensim–python framework for vector space modelling. NLP Centre, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic 3, 2(2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Laura Wilson, Susie Ho, and Rowan H. Brookes. 2018. Student perceptions of teamwork within assessment tasks in undergraduate science degrees. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43, 5 (July 2018), 786–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1409334Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Marcelo Worsley, Khalil Anderson, Natalie Melo, and JooYoung Jang. 2021. Designing Analytics for Collaboration Literacy and Student Empowerment. Journal of Learning Analytics 8, 1 (April 2021), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7242Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Marcelo Worsley and Xavier Ochoa. 2020. Towards Collaboration Literacy Development through Multimodal Learning Analytics. (2020), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Real-time Feedback for Developing Conversation Literacy

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ICMI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
          November 2022
          830 pages
          ISBN:9781450393904
          DOI:10.1145/3536221

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 November 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format