Bambang Leo Handoko
ABSTRACT
Development of the business world today is growing rapidly. Business certainly wants corporate growth. Every effort and effort are being made to increase corporate growth. We try to examine the factors that influence corporate growth. Our research is descriptive quantitative research. We use an ordinary least square analysis using independent variables: gender difference, CEO strategic, Corporate Social Responsibility with the addition of a moderating variable of financial performance on the dependent variable of corporate growth. We use secondary data taken from banking sector companies listed on the Indonesian stock exchange in the 2016-2020 period. We use statistical analysis with the help of statistical software SPSS 26. Our results state that gender difference and strategic CEO can only affect corporate growth if moderated by financial performance, but corporate social responsibility can affect corporate growth directly without having to be moderated.
- D. Dienes, R. Sassen, and J. Fischer, “What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review,” Sustain. Accounting, Manag. Policy J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 154–189, 2016, doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2014-0050.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- C. Herzig and B. Ghosh, Sustainability reporting,” in Business Student's Guide to Sustainable Management, The: Principles and Practice. 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. Rezaee, “Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective,” J. Account. Lit., vol. 36, pp. 48–64, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.acclit.2016.05.003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Agus Harjoto, I. Laksmana, and R. Lee, “The impact of demographic characteristics of CEOs and directors on audit fees and audit delay Maretno,” vol. 30, no. 8/9, pp. 963–997, 2013.Google Scholar
- M. del M. Alonso-Almeida, J. Perramon, and L. Bagur-Femenias, “Leadership styles and corporate social responsibility management: Analysis from a gender perspective,” Bus. Ethics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 147–161, 2017, doi: 10.1111/beer.12139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. S. Kahreh, A. Babania, M. Tive, and S. M. Mirmehdi, “An Examination to Effects of Gender Differences on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 109, pp. 664–668, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.525.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sukirno, “Balanced Scorecard: Implementasi Interaksional Agency Theory Dan Stakeholder Theory Dalam Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Pendidik. Akunt. Indones., vol. 15, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.21831/jpai.v15i2.17218.Google Scholar
- B. L. Parmar, R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, A. C. Wicks, L. Purnell, and S. de Colle, “Stakeholder theory: The state of the art,” Acad. Manag. Ann., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 403–445, 2010, doi: 10.1080/19416520.2010.495581.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Raendran, R. K. Ramasamy, I. S. Rosdi, R. A. Razak, and N. M. Fauzi, “IoT technology for facilities management: Understanding end user perception of the smart toilet,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 353–359, 2020, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110547.Google Scholar
- T. C. T. Hou, “The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: firm-level evidence from Taiwan,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2019, doi: 10.1002/csr.1647.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Hörisch, R. E. Freeman, and S. Schaltegger, “Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management: Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, and a Conceptual Framework,” Organ. Environ., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 328–346, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1086026614535786.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Safieddine, W. Masri, and P. Pourghomi, “Corporate Responsibility in Combating Online Misinformation,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 126–132, 2016, doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070217.Google Scholar
- L. Raimi, “Understanding theories of corporate social responsibility in the Ibero-American hospitality industry,” Dev. Corp. Gov. Responsib., vol. 11, pp. 65–88, 2017, doi: 10.1108/S2043-052320170000011004.Google Scholar
- L. N. Simionescu, “The Gender Differences Effect on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),” Ann. „Constantin Brâncuşi, no. 3, pp. 170–175, 2015.Google Scholar
- A. A. Perryman, G. D. Fernando, and A. Tripathy, “Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 579–586, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. T. Fang, E. Ng, C. M. Wang, and M. L. Hsu, “Normative beliefs, attitudes, and social norms: People reduce waste as an index of social relationships when spending leisure time,” Sustain., vol. 9, no. 10, 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9101696.Google Scholar
- G. Charness and U. Gneezy, “Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking,” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 50–58, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. L. Handoko, G. Soepriyanto, and A. S. Lin Lindawati, “Technology acceptance model on micro business owner in grogol Petamburan district,” PervasiveHealth Pervasive Comput. Technol. Healthc., pp. 271–276, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3335484.3335498.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Wang, R. M. Holmes, R. A. Devine, and J. Bishoff, “CEO gender differences in careers and the moderating role of country culture: A meta-analytic investigation,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 148, no. September, pp. 30–53, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.04.002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Zeng and L. Wang, “CEO gender and corporate cash holdings. Are female CEOs more conservative?,” Asia-Pacific J. Account. Econ., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 449–474, 2015, doi: 10.1080/16081625.2014.1003568.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Gambetta, M. A. García-Benau, and A. Zorio-Grima, “Data analytics in banks’ audit: The case of loan loss provisions in Uruguay,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 4793–4797, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.032.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Abernethy, Y. F. Kuang, and B. Qin, “The Relation between Strategy, CEO Selection, and Firm Performance,” Contemp. Account. Res., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1575–1606, 2019, doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12463.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. De Grosbois, “Corporate social responsibility reporting by the global hotel industry: Commitment, initiatives and performance,” Int. J. Hosp. Manag., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 896–905, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.10.008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Martins, C. Costa, T. Oliveira, R. Gonçalves, and F. Branco, “How smartphone advertising influences consumers’ purchase intention,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 94, no. December 2017, pp. 378–387, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.047.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. L. Barnett, “Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility,” Limits to Stakehold. Influ. Why Bus. Case Won't Save World, pp. 56–78, 2018, doi: 10.4337/9781788970693.00008.Google Scholar
- L. Farinha, M. E. Spaliara, and S. Tsoukas, “Bank shocks and firm performance: New evidence from the sovereign debt crisis,” J. Financ. Intermediation, vol. 40, no. April, p. 100818, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jfi.2019.01.005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. B. Barney and A. M. Arikan, The Resource-based View: Origins and Implications. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management, 2008.Google Scholar
- C. Ghafran and N. O'Sullivan, “The governance role of audit committees: Reviewing a decade of evidence,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 381–407, 2013, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00347.x.Google Scholar
- S. N. Borlea, M. V. Achim, and C. Mare, “Board characteristics and firm performances in emerging economies. Lessons from Romania,” Econ. Res. Istraz. , vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 55–75, 2017, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2017.1291359.Google Scholar
- M. Adusei, S. Y. Akomea, and K. Poku, “Board and management gender diversity and financial performance of microfinance institutions,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2017.1360030.Google Scholar
- M. Faccio, M. T. Marchica, and R. Mura, “CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation,” J. Corp. Financ., vol. 39, pp. 193–209, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. H. Neely, J. B. Lovelace, A. P. Cowen, and N. J. Hiller, Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Research, vol. 46, no. 6. 2020.Google Scholar
- C. Maurin and P. Yeophantong, “Going global responsibly? China's strategies towards ‘sustainable’ overseas investments,” Pac. Aff., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 281–303, 2013, doi: 10.5509/2013862281.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Maqbool and M. N. Zameer, “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks,” Futur. Bus. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 84–93, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fbj.2017.12.002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Akben-Selcuk, “Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of ownership concentration in Turkey,” Sustainability, vol. 11 no 13, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11133643.Google Scholar
- L. Mwangi, “Audit Failure or Lack of Accounting Candor?,” 2012.Google Scholar
- U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Method For Business. 2014.Google Scholar
- J. W. Creswell, Research Design. 2014.Google Scholar
- I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Update PLS Regresi. Edisi Delapan. 2016.Google Scholar
- U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods For Business. A Skill Builing Approch. 7th Edition. 2016.Google Scholar
- S. Gill, “Is gender inclusivity an answer to ethical issues in business? An Indian stance,” Gend. Manag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 37–63, 2010, doi: 10.1108/17542411011019922.Google Scholar
- V. M. Papadakis, “Do CEOs shape the process of making strategic decisions? Evidence from Greece,” Manag. Decis., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 367–394, 2006, doi: 10.1108/00251740610656269.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Wang, E. Walker, and J. Redmond, “Explaining the Lack of Strategic Planning in SMEs: The Importance of Owner Motivation,” Int. J. Organ. Behav., vol. 12, no. 121, pp. 1–16, 2007.Google Scholar
- W. J. Smith, R. E. Wokutch, K. V. Harrington, and B. S. Dennis, “An Examination of the Influence of Diversity and Stakeholder Role on Corporate Social Orientation,” Bus. Soc., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 266–294, 2001, doi: 10.1177/000765030104000303.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Vestal and R. Guidice, “The determinants and performance consequences of CEO strategic advice seeking,” J. Gen. Manag., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 232–242, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0306307019833491.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Impact of Gender, CEO Strategy and CSR Implementation on Corporate Growth Moderated by Financial Performance in Banking Sector
Recommendations
The Effect of Green Accounting and CSR Disclosure to Profitability of LQ 45 Companies in Indonesia
ICEEG '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E-GovernmentThe Research aimed to find out the effect of green accounting application and corporate social responsibility disclosure toward profitability of LQ 45 Companies in Indonesia. The independent variable were green accounting variable and CSR disclosure ...
CEO Turnover and Corporate Performance: A Comparison of Family and Nonfamily Businesses
ICEICE '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Second International Conference on Electric Information and Control Engineering - Volume 04This study tested the effectiveness of corporate governance by investigating the link between CEO turnover and corporate governance of family and nonfamily firms in China. The results show that CEO turnover is significantly lower in family firms and its ...
Social Responsibility Beyond the Corporate: Executive Mental Accounting Across Sectoral and Issue Domains
Business elites influence the allocation of resources to a range of causes related to the social good, such as to corporate community or environmental programs. We extend research on executive influence on corporate attention to alternative causes by ...
Comments