ABSTRACT
Investment in infrastructures is attracting more and more attention from both policy makers and entrepreneurs. We study the impact of infrastructures on economic welfare using a nationally representative microeconomic dataset – China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The economic welfare of interests includes income, labor supply and self-reported health status. By constructing an index of essential facilities defined as the infrastructures that are necessary and essential for daily living, and by constructing an index of nonessential facilities are defined as the infrastructures which can raise the living standard but not mandatory to people's daily life, we identified a positive impact of both essential facilities and nonessential facilities on economic welfare, however, when these two variables are simultaneously included into the regression, the nonessential facilities turn insignificant, which suggests the importance the essential facilities over nonessential facilities. To be more specific, 1 unit increase in essential facilities index is associated with an increase in annual income by 2911.4 Yuan, with an increase in labor supply by 0.65 month, and with an increase in the probability of having a good self-reported health status by 2%.
- Seitz, H. (1995). The productivity and supply of urban infrastructures. Annals ofRegional Science, 29(2), 121- 141.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dalenberg, D.R., & MD Partridge. (1995). The effects of taxes, expenditures, and public infrastructure on metropolitan area employment*. Journal ofRegional Science, 35(4).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lindberg, D., & Humphreys, B.L. (1995). The high-performance computing and communications program, the national information infrastructure and health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Jamia, 2(3), 156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baker, Dean, and David Rosnick. 2012. Do Tax Cuts Boost the Economy? Center for Economic Policy and Research working paper.Google Scholar
- Barro, Robert J., and Charles J. Redlick. 2011. “Macroeconomic Effects from Government Purchases and Taxes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 126, no. 1, 51–102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bivens, Josh. 2012a. Public Investment: The Next “New Thing” for Powering Economic Growth. Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper No. 338. http://www.epi.org/files/2012/bp338-public-investments.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Fitzsimmons, G. J., & Sadkowsky, K.R. (2002). The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Communicable Diseases Intelligence, 26(4), 605-607. Communicable diseases intelligence, 26(4), 605-607.Google Scholar
- John F., and John B. Taylor. 2012. “What the Government Purchases Multiplier Actually Multiplied in the 2009 Stimulus Package.” In Government Policies and the Delayed Economic Recovery, Lee Ohanian, John B. Taylor, and Ian J. Wright (eds.). Stanford University: Hoover Press.Hankivsky, O. (2012).Google Scholar
- Women's health, men's health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Social Science & Medicine, 74(11), 1712- 1720.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The economic journal, 75(299), 493-517.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Impact of Infrastructure Construction on Economic Welfare: Evidence from China
Recommendations
Infrastructure Securitization in China
ICEE '10: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-GovernmentInfrastructure in China is generally financed by government debt and bank loans, which endangers the financial system of the nation. This paper proposed asset-backed securitization as an instrument to solve the problem of financing infrastructure. This ...
Two Birds with One Stone: Fairness and Welfare via Transfers
Algorithmic Game TheoryAbstractWe study the question of dividing a collection of indivisible items amongst a set of agents. The main objective of research in the area is to achieve one of two goals: fairness or efficiency. On the fairness side, envy-freeness is the central ...
Dynamics of Welfare of the Population of a Country
The author shows that there is a limit in economy at which the rate of growth of GDP becomes less than the rate of growth of welfare; and to maintain current welfare, the population decreases by birth rate decrease. In post-industrial economies, the ...
Comments