skip to main content
10.1145/3537797.3537806acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Unleashing Indigenous Iban Values For Collective Technology Design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The digital divide continues to be a problem on a global scale. Since the pandemic began, there has been widespread media coverage of people being unable to work from home or conduct online studies due to the lack of internet access. Many development and design approaches have been used to accomplish specific rural community objectives, including user-centred, participatory and co-design. Each of these strategies is effective at accomplishing certain specific objectives. The purpose of this research is to investigate the cultural and values dimension of the Iban indigenous community in Malaysian Borneo, Sarawak, using a value sensitive design approach. Domestic and cultural probes techniques were used to conduct design workshops with members of the community to explore indigenous communal values and finally, the card sorting method was used to reflect and create meaning from the information gathered. Our processes of engagement and co-design targets establishing a pluriversal design space for building trust, dialogue and co-existence despite the differences between academic and indigenous knowledge systems. In future, the primary discovery regarding collective values will be incorporated into the design and development of Community Networks as a solution bridging the digital divide for the indigenous community in Sarawak.

References

  1. Amalia G. Sabiescu, Salomão David, Izak van Zyl, and Lorenzo Cantoni. 2014. Emerging spaces in community-based participatory design: reflections from two case studies. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661446Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Arturo Escobar. 2018. Autonomous design and the emergent transnational critical design studies field. Strategic Design Research Journal 11, 2 (2018), 139–146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bala, Poline, and Chong Eng Tan. Digital inclusion of the Orang Asli of Peninsular Malaysia: Remote virtual mechanism for usability of telecentres amongst indigenous peoples. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 87, 4 (2021): e12171Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Belli, Luca, Bruno de Souza Ramos, Panayotis Antoniadis, Virginie Aubrée, Roger Baig Viñas, Aris Dadoukis, Paolo Dini 2018. The community network manual: how to build the Internet yourself (2018). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/filedepot_download/4391/2376Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Community Broadband Centre (CBC). 2007. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. (2007). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://www.mcmc.gov.my/skmmgovmy/files/34/346e37d7-5d58-4fae-a923-59608e0ba6fb/files/assets/basic-html/page-31.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Corelia Baibarac and Doina Petrescu. 2017. Co-design and urban resilience: Visioning tools for commoning resilience practices. CoDesign. 17, 1 (2017), 83–100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders, Eva Brandt, and Thomas Binder. 2010. A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 195–198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900476Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fleming, John, and Robert J. Ledogar. Resilience, an evolving concept: A review of literature relevant to Aboriginal research. Pimatisiwin 6, 2 (2008), 7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, Batya, and Peter H. Kahn Jr. 2003. Human values, ethics, and design. The human-computer interaction handbook (72 ed.) Cambridge University Press, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gneiting, Uwe. "Does the Promise Hold? A Review of the Effects of Human Rights-Based Approaches on International Development Programs." A Review of the Effects of Human Rights-Based Approaches on International Development Programs. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Government of Malaysia. 2021. Twelve Malaysia Plan 2021-2025. (2021). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://rmke12.epu.gov.my/file/download/2021092721_rancangan_malaysia_kedua_belas.pdf?path=fileUpload/2021/09/2021092721_rancangan_malaysia_kedua_belas.pdf&name=Dokumen%20RMKe-12.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, Roger, Narayanan AL N. Kulathu Ramaiyer, and John Tarawe. 2018. The eBario Story: ICTs for Rural Development. In 2018 International Conference on ICT for Rural Development (IC-ICTRuDev). IEEE (2018), 63-68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Shilumbe Chivuno-Kuria, Gereon Koch Kapuire, Nicola J. Bidwell, and Edwin Blake. 2010. Being participated: a community approach. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900443Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ibrahim, Huda, Azman Yasin, and Zulkhairi Md Dahalin. 2010. Financial Sustainability Issues in Malaysia's Telecentres. Comput. Inf. Sci. 3, 2 (2010), 235-240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ITU-USF (Pakistan) Workshop On Internet Access And Adoption. 2018. ITU. (2018). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Regional-Presence/AsiaPacific/Pages/ITU-USF-(Pakistan)-Workshop-on-Internet-Access-and-Adoption.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kheirandish, Shadi, Mathias Funk, Stephan Wensveen, Maarten Verkerk, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2020. HuValue: a tool to support design students in considering human values in their design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 30, 5 (2020), 1015-1041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kirmayer, Laurence J., Stéphane Dandeneau, Elizabeth Marshall, Morgan Kahentonni Phillips, and Karla Jessen Williamson. 2011. Rethinking resilience from indigenous perspectives. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 56, 2 (2011), 84-91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kirmayer, Laurence J., Stéphane Dandeneau, Elizabeth Marshall, Morgan Kahentonni Phillips, and Karla Jessen Williamson. 2012. Toward an ecology of stories: Indigenous perspectives on resilience. In The social ecology of resilience. Springer, New York, NY (2012), 399-414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Leong, Tuck Wah, and Ole Sejer Iversen. Values-led participatory design as a pursuit of meaningful alternatives. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the australian special interest group for computer human interaction. (2015)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mara Balestrini, Jon Bird, Paul Marshall, Alberto Zaro, and Yvonne Rogers. 2014. Understanding sustained community engagement: a case study in heritage preservation in rural argentina. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2675–2684. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557323Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mausch, Kai, Dave Harris, and Javier Revilla Diez. 2021. Rural aspirations: Reflections for development planning, design and localized effects. The European Journal of Development Research 33, 4 (2021), 795-808.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Nancy, B., Gary Loh Chee Wyai, M. Razi Bazin, and T. M. Panceras. 2021. A case study: Broadband over powerline for rural area deployment in Sarawak. In E3S Web of Conferences, volume 242, EDP Sciences (2021), 03001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124203001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press, (1990)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pravin Bhagwat, Bhaskaran Raman, and Dheeraj Sanghi. 2004. Turning 802.11 inside-out. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 34, 1 (January 2004), 33–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/972374.972381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Reitsma, Elizabeth Simone. 2015. Dynamics of Respectful Design in Co-Creative and Co-Reflective Encounters with Indigenous Communities. University of Northumbria at Newcastle (United Kingdom), (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodil, Kasper, Matthias Rehm, and Heike Winschiers-Theophilus. 2013. Homestead creator: using card sorting in search for culture-aware categorizations of interface objects. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2013), 437-444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rumah King. 2006. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. (2006). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://www.mcmc.gov.my/skmmgovmy/files/00/00617ae4-133a-4657-b8b2-a953edef6c64/files/assets/basic-html/page-23.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Seredkina, Natalia N. Revisiting Methodological Principles of Cultural-Semiotic Approach in Studying Art of Indigenous Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East. (2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Zaman, Tariq. 2016. It Is Not a Village But People: Long Lamai, a Case Study Of a Smart Village (2016). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://e4sv.org/not-village-people-long-lamai-case-study-smart-village.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tan, Chong Eng, Poline Bala, Sei Ping Lau, and Siew Mooi Wong. 2020. The TPOA Telecentre: A community sustainable telecentre architecture. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science Application 11, 8 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tourism, Homestays Reap Digital Economy Benefits. 2018. Borneo Post Online. (December 2018). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from https://www.theborneopost.com/2018/12/30/tourism-homestays-reap-digital-economy-benefits/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ulturgasheva, Olga, Stacy Rasmus, Lisa Wexler, Kristine Nystad, and Michael Kral. 2014. Arctic indigenous youth resilience and vulnerability: Comparative analysis of adolescent experiences across five circumpolar communities. Transcultural Psychiatry 51, 5 (2014), 735-756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Vota, Wayan. 2011. A Great Success: World Bank has a 70% failure rate with ICT4D projects to increase universal access. (August 2011). Retrieved February 14, 2022 from ICTWork: http://www. ictworks. org/2011/08/17/greatsuccess-world-bank-has-70-failure-rate-ict4d-projects-increase-universal-acces.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilkins, Karin Gwinn. Redeveloping communication for social change: Theory, practice, and power. 2000. Rowman & Littlefield (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. William W. Gaver, Andrew Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. interactions 11, 5 (September + October 2004), 53–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1015530.1015555Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Wong-Villacres, Marisol, Culture in action: Unpacking capacities to inform assets-based design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2020)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood, Jed R., and Larry E. Wood. 2018. Card sorting: current practices and beyond. Journal of Usability Studies 4, 1 (2008), 1-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeo, Alvin W., Faisal S. Hazis, Tariq Zaman, Peter Songan, and Khairuddin Ab Hamid. 2012. Telecentre replication initiative in borneo malaysia: The coeri experience. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 50, 1 (2012), 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Zaman, Tariq, Gary Loh Chee Wyai, and Shaista Falak. 2021. eTourism and Cultural Resilience: Exploring Opportunities for Indigenous Communities in an Extremely Precarious State. In Pandemic, Lockdown, and Digital Transformation. Springer, Cham, (2021), 65-78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Zaman, Tariq, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Franklin George, Alvin Yeo Wee, Hasnain Falak, and Naska Goagoses. 2016. Using sketches to communicate interaction protocols of an indigenous community. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2 (PDC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2948076.2948088Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zanolli, Bruna, Carla Gonzalez JANCZ, Cristiana Daiane Araujo dos SANTOS, and Débora PRADO. 2018. Feminist infrastructure and community networks. Global Information Society Watch 2018, Community Networks, APC (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format