skip to main content
10.1145/3537972.3538006acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Motion-Sensor Programming for Accessible Interfaces

Published:30 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motion-sensing devices that track the movement of human bodies, rigid body marker clusters, and eyes offer a diverse range of alternative input modalities that can be applied to create more accessible interfaces for diverse user populations. We present a set of curricular modules and open-source software suitable for use at the two- or four-year college level to teach accessible design featuring programming of three different types of motion-sensing input devices. The intended audience are software developers or students in computing-related fields. The curricular modules are open source and include guidelines for accessible design, readings, lab activities and project assignment prompts.

References

  1. Catherine M. Baker, Yasmine N. El-Glaly, and Kristen Shinohara. 2020. A Systematic Analysis of Accessibility in Computing Education Research. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mark Brown and Sky LaRell Anderson. 2020. Designing for Disability: Evaluating the State of Accessibility Design in Video Games. Games and Culture 16(2020), 702 – 718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jim A. Carter and David W. Fourney. 2007. Techniques to Assist in Developing Accessibility Engineers. In Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Tempe, Arizona, USA) (Assets ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/1296843.1296865Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Patricia Compañ-Rosique, Rafael Molina-Carmona, Francisco José Gallego-Durán, Rosana Satorre-Cuerda, Carlos Villagrá-Arnedo, and Faraón Llorens-Largo. 2019. A guide for making video games accessible to users with cerebral palsy. Universal Access in the Information Society 18 (2019), 565 – 581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Every, Shawn van, and Jamhoury, Lisa. [n. d.]. Kinectron. https://kinectron.github.io/, Last accessed on 2022-03-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Luc Geurts, Vero Vanden Abeele, Jelle Husson, Frederik Windey, Maarten Van Overveldt, Jan-Henk Annema, and Stef Desmet. 2010. Digital Games for Physical Therapy: Fulfilling the Need for Calibration and Adaptation. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Funchal, Portugal) (TEI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935725Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Conor Kaminer, Kevin LeBras, Jordan McCall, Tan Phan, Paul Naud, Mircea Teodorescu, and Sri Kurniawan. 2014. An Immersive Physical Therapy Game for Stroke Survivors. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Rochester, New York, USA) (ASSETS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 299–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Saba Kawas, Laura Vonessen, and Amy J. Ko. 2019. Teaching Accessibility: A Design Exploration of Faculty Professional Development at Scale. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 983–989. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287399Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. James C. Lester, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, and Brian A. Stone. 1997. The pedagogical design studio: exploiting artifact-based task models for constructivist learning. In IUI ’97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tim Levene and Robert Steele. 2017. The Quantified Self and Physical Therapy: The Application of Motion Sensing Technologies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis (Lakeland, FL, USA) (ICCDA ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1145/3093241.3093272Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rafael Molina-Carmona, Rosana Satorre-Cuerda, Carlos Villagrá, and Patricia Compañ-Rosique. 2017. Training Socially Responsible Engineers by Developing Accessible Video Games. In HCI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. OptiKey. 2022. Communicate and use your computer with your eyes. http://www.optikey.org/, Last accessed on 2022-02-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Project Iris. 2022. Next generation eye control. https://iris.xcessity.at/, Last accessed on 2022-02-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Luis Salvador-Ullauri, Patricia Acosta-Vargas, and Sergio Luján-Mora. 2020. Web-Based Serious Games and Accessibility: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences 10(2020), 7859.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Martin Tall, Alexandre Alapetite, Javier San Agustin, Henrik H.T Skovsgaard, John Paulin Hansen, Dan Witzner Hansen, and Emilie Møllenbach. 2009. Gaze-Controlled Driving. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI EA ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4387–4392. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520671Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. WebAIM. [n. d.]. WebAIM: Survey of Web Accessibility Practitioners. https://webaim.org/projects/practitionersurvey/, Last accessed on 2022-03-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Bei Yuan, Eelke Folmer, and Frederick C. Harris. 2010. Game accessibility: a survey. Universal Access in the Information Society 10 (2010), 81–100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Guangtao Zhang and John Paulin Hansen. 2019. Accessible Control of Telepresence Robots Based on Eye Tracking. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (Denver, Colorado) (ETRA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 50, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314111.3322869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Motion-Sensor Programming for Accessible Interfaces
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MOCO '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Movement and Computing
        June 2022
        262 pages
        ISBN:9781450387163
        DOI:10.1145/3537972

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 June 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format