skip to main content
10.1145/3538637.3538849acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

DACF: day-ahead carbon intensity forecasting of power grids using machine learning

Published:28 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Electricity usage is a substantial source of carbon emissions worldwide. There has been significant interest in reducing the carbon impact of energy usage through supply-side shifts to cleaner generation sources and through demand-side optimizations to reduce carbon usage. An essential building block for these optimizations is future knowledge of the carbon intensity of the supplied electricity. In this paper, we present a Day-Ahead Carbon Forecasting system (DACF) that predicts the carbon intensity from scope 2 emissions in the power grids using machine learning. DACF first computes production forecasts for all the electricity-generating sources and then combines them with the carbon-emission rate of each source to generate a carbon intensity forecast. DACF provides a general approach that works well across a range of geographically distributed regions. DACF has a mean MAPE of 6.4% across the regions. It also achieves an average decrease of 6.4% and a maximum decrease of 8.6% in MAPE compared to the state-of-the-art. We make DACF publicly available so that it is easily accessible to researchers.

References

  1. Martín Abadi, Ashish Agarwal, Paul Barham, Eugene Brevdo, Zhifeng Chen, Craig Citro, Greg S. Corrado, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Ian Goodfellow, Andrew Harp, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, Yangqing Jia, Rafal Jozefowicz, Lukasz Kaiser, Manjunath Kudlur, Josh Levenberg, Dan Mané, Rajat Monga, Sherry Moore, Derek Murray, Chris Olah, Mike Schuster, Jonathon Shlens, Benoit Steiner, Ilya Sutskever, Kunal Talwar, Paul Tucker, Vincent Vanhoucke, Vijay Vasudevan, Fernanda Viégas, Oriol Vinyals, Pete Warden, Martin Wattenberg, Martin Wicke, Yuan Yu, and Xiaoqiang Zheng. 2015. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems. http://tensorflow.org/ Software available from tensorflow.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. US Energy Information Administration. 2018. Real-time Operating Grid. Retrieved February 6, 2022 from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/gridmonitor/dashboard/electric_overview/US48/US48Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde, Bo Tranberg, and Gorm Bruun Andresen. 2021. Short-term CO2 emissions forecasting based on decomposition approaches and its impact on electricity market scheduling. Applied Energy 281 (2021), 116061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A Bruce, Lyndon Ruff, James Kelloway, Fraser MacMillan, and Alex Rogers. 2021. Carbon intensity forecast methodology. National Grid ESO: Warwick, UK. Available online: https://github.com/carbon-intensity/methodology/raw/master/Carbon%20Intensity%20Forecast 20 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. California ISO. 2005--2022. Open Access Same-time Information System (OASIS). Retrieved February 8, 2022 from http://oasis.caiso.com/mrioasis/logon.doGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. François Chollet et al. 2015. Keras. https://keras.io.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Climate Change. 2014. Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-iii.pdf#page=7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Startegy. 2021. 2021 Government Greenhouse Gas Conversion Factors for Company Reporting. Retrieved April 26, 2022 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1049346/2021-ghg-conversion-factors-methodology.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ElectricityMap. 2020. Zone bounding boxes. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://github.com/electricityMap/electricitymap-contrib/blob/master/config/zones.jsonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ElectricityMap. 2022. ElectricityMap. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://electricitymap.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. European association for the cooperation of transmission system operators. 2008. ENTSOE transparency platform. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://transparency.entsoe.eu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Julian Huber, Kai Lohmann, Marc Schmidt, and Christof Weinhardt. 2021. Carbon efficient smart charging using forecasts of marginal emission factors. Journal of Cleaner Production 284 (2021), 124766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. International Energy Agency. 2019. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019: Emissions. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-dataGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenneth Leerbeck, Peder Bacher, Rune Grønborg Junker, Goran Goranović, Olivier Corradi, Razgar Ebrahimy, Anna Tveit, and Henrik Madsen. 2020. Short-term forecasting of CO2 emission intensity in power grids by machine learning. Applied Energy 277 (2020), 115527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gordon Lowry. 2018. Day-ahead forecasting of grid carbon intensity in support of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning plant demand response decision-making to reduce carbon emissions. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 39, 6 (2018), 749--760.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Luke George. 2021. The Correct Way to Average the Globe. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://towardsdatascience.com/the-correct-way-to-average-the-globe-92ceecd172b7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. National Centers for Environmental Prediction, National Weather Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce. 2015. NCEP GFS 0.25 Degree Global Forecast Grids Historical Archive. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. United Satets Environmental Protection Agency. 2021. Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Scope 2 Guidance. Retrieved April 26, 2022 from https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Scope%202%20Guidance_Final_Sept26.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2021. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-dataGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2021. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions#:~:text=Larger%20image%20to%20save%20or%20print%20The%20Electricity%20sector%20involves,2O)%20are%20also%20emitted.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Watttime. 2022. Watttime. Retrieved February 8, 2022 from https://www.watttime.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. DACF: day-ahead carbon intensity forecasting of power grids using machine learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        e-Energy '22: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems
        June 2022
        630 pages
        ISBN:9781450393973
        DOI:10.1145/3538637

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 June 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

        Upcoming Conference

        e-Energy '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader