skip to main content
10.1145/3539597.3573023acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

MMBench: The Match Making Benchmark

Published:27 February 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Video gaming has gained huge popularity over the last few decades. As reported, there are about 2.9 billion gamers globally. Among all genres, competitive games are one of the most popular ones.

Matchmaking is a core problem for competitive games, which determines the player satisfaction, hence influences the game success. Most matchmaking systems group the queuing players into opposing teams with similar skill levels. The key challenge is to accurately rate the players' skills based on their match performances. There has been an increasing amount of effort on developing such rating systems such as Elo, Glicko.

However, games with different game-plays might have different game modes, which might require an extensive amount of effort for rating system customization. Even though there are many rating system choices and various customization strategies, there is a clear lack of a systematic framework with which different rating systems can be analysed and compared against each other. Such a framework could help game developers to identify the bottlenecks of their matchmaking systems and enhance the performance of their matchmaking systems.

To bridge the gap, we present MMBench, the first benchmark framework for evaluating different rating systems. It serves as a fair means of comparison for different rating systems and enables a deeper understanding of different rating systems. In this paper, we will present how MMBench could benchmark the three major rating systems, Elo, Glicko, Trueskill in the battle modes of 1 vs 1, n vs n, battle royal and teamed battle royal over both real and synthetic datasets.

References

  1. Craig Chapple. 2020. PUBG Mobile Tops List of Billion-Dollar Mobile Games in 2020. (2020). https://sensortower.com/blog/pubg-mobile-tops-billion-dollarmobile-games-2020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Shuo Chen and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Predicting matchups and preferences in context. (2016), 775--784.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arman Dehpanah, Muheeb Faizan Ghori, Jonathan Gemmell, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2021. The evaluation of rating systems in online free-for-all games. (2021), 131--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Olivier Delalleau, Emile Contal, Eric Thibodeau-Laufer, Raul Chandias Ferrari, Yoshua Bengio, and Frank Zhang. 2012. Beyond skill rating: Advanced matchmaking in ghost recon online. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 4, 3 (2012), 167--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Arpad E Elo. 1978. The rating of chessplayers, past and present. BT Batsford Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mark E Glickman. 1995. The glicko system. Boston University 16 (1995), 16--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mark E Glickman. 2012. Example of the Glicko-2 system. Boston University (2012), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ralf Herbrich, Tom Minka, and Thore Graepel. 2006. TrueSkill?: a Bayesian skill rating system. Advances in neural information processing systems 19 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pei Li. 2021. PUBG Mobile reports 1 billion accumulated downloads since 2018 launch. (2021). https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tencent-videogamesidUSKBN2BH0D1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yao Li, Minhao Cheng, Kevin Fujii, Fushing Hsieh, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. 2018. Learning from group comparisons: exploiting higher order interactions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Joshua E Menke and Tony R Martinez. 2008. A Bradley--Terry artificial neural network model for individual ratings in group competitions. Neural computing and Applications 17, 2 (2008), 175--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tom Minka, Ryan Cleven, and Yordan Zaykov. 2018. Trueskill 2: An improved bayesian skill rating system. Technical Report (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Newzoo. 2021. Newzoo Global Games Market Report 2021. (2021). https://newzoo.com/insights/articles/global-games-market-to-generate-175--8-billion-in-2021-despite-a-slight-decline-the-market-is-on-track-tosurpass-200-billion-in-2023/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lei Zhang, Jun Wu, Zhong-Cun Wang, and Chong-Jun Wang. 2010. A factorbased model for context-sensitive skill rating systems. 2 (2010), 249--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. MMBench: The Match Making Benchmark

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSDM '23: Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
        February 2023
        1345 pages
        ISBN:9781450394079
        DOI:10.1145/3539597

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 February 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate498of2,863submissions,17%

        Upcoming Conference

      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader