skip to main content
10.1145/3539618.3592083acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

User-Dependent Learning to Debias for Recommendation

Published:18 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recommender systems (RSs), inverse propensity score (IPS) has been a key technique to mitigate popularity bias by decreasing the contribution of popular items in modeling user-item interactions. However, conventional IPS treats all users equally, which tends to over-debias the popularity-insensitive (PI) users and under-debias the popularity-sensitive (PS) users. Furthermore, in such a treatment, IPS only performs slightly well on the debiased test while does not work on the normal biased test. To this end, we propose a user-dependent IPS (UDIPS in short) method, which adaptively conducts propensity estimation for each user-item pair based on the user's sensitivity to item popularity. Like IPS, our theoretical analysis validates the unbiasedness of UDIPS. Remarkably, our solution is model-agnostic and can be easily used to upgrade current unbiased recommenders. We implemented it in four state-of-the-art models for unbiased recommendation, and experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in both unbiased and normal biased test.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

SIGIR23-sp7557.mp4

mp4

11.6 MB

References

  1. Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019. Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-Ranking. In FLAIRS. 413--418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Himan Abdollahpouri and Masoud Mansoury. 2020. Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommendation. CoRR, Vol. abs/2006.15772 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Yang Qiu, Xiangnan He, Xin Xin, Liang Chen, Guli Lin, and Keping Yang. 2021. AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendation. In SIGIR. 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiawei Chen, Hande Dong, Xiang Wang, Fuli Feng, Meng Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2023. Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 41, 3 (2023), 39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sihao Ding, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Jinqiu Jin, Wenjie Wang, Yong Liao, and Yongdong Zhang. 2022. Interpolative Distillation for Unifying Biased and Debiased Recommendation. In SIGIR. 40--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alois Gruson, Praveen Chandar, Christophe Charbuillet, James McInerney, Samantha Hansen, Damien Tardieu, and Ben Carterette. 2019. Offline Evaluation to Make Decisions About PlaylistRecommendation Algorithms. In WSDM. 420--428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jin Huang, Harrie Oosterhuis, and Maarten de Rijke. 2022. It Is Different When Items Are Older: Debiasing Recommendations When Selection Bias and User Preferences Are Dynamic. In WSDM. 381--389.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Thorsten Joachims, Adith Swaminathan, and Tobias Schnabel. 2017. Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedback. In WSDM. 781--789.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dugang Liu, Pengxiang Cheng, Zhenhua Dong, Xiuqiang He, Weike Pan, and Zhong Ming. 2020. A General Knowledge Distillation Framework for Counterfactual Recommendation via Uniform Data. In SIGIR. 831--840.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wondo Rhee, Sung Min Cho, and Bongwon Suh. 2022. Countering Popularity Bias by Regularizing Score Differences. In RecSys. 145--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tobias Schnabel, Adith Swaminathan, Ashudeep Singh, Navin Chandak, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluation. In ICML, Vol. 48. 1670--1679.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Xiang Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplification. In KDD. 1717--1725.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiaojie Wang, Rui Zhang, Yu Sun, and Jianzhong Qi. 2019. Doubly Robust Joint Learning for Recommendation on Data Missing Not at Random. In ICML, Vol. 97. 6638--6647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tianxin Wei, Fuli Feng, Jiawei Chen, Ziwei Wu, Jinfeng Yi, and Xiangnan He. 2021. Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender System. In KDD. 1791--1800.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Guipeng Xv, Chen Lin, Hui Li, Jinsong Su, Weiyao Ye, and Yewang Chen. 2022. Neutralizing Popularity Bias in Recommendation Models. In SIGIR. 2623--2628.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Longqi Yang, Yin Cui, Yuan Xuan, Chenyang Wang, Serge J. Belongie, and Deborah Estrin. 2018. Unbiased offline recommender evaluation for missing-not-at-random implicit feedback. In RecSys. 279--287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mi Zhang and Neil Hurley. 2008. Avoiding monotony: improving the diversity of recommendation lists. In RecSys. 123--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Tianxin Wei, Chonggang Song, Guohui Ling, and Yongdong Zhang. 2021. Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendation. In SIGIR. 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ziwei Zhu, Yun He, Xing Zhao, Yin Zhang, Jianling Wang, and James Caverlee. 2021. Popularity-Opportunity Bias in Collaborative Filtering. In WSDM. 85--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User-Dependent Learning to Debias for Recommendation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '23: Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2023
      3567 pages
      ISBN:9781450394086
      DOI:10.1145/3539618

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 July 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)194
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader