skip to main content
10.1145/3542954.3542998acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

LocatAR - An Augmented Reality Application for Local Points of Interest Identification

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In unfamiliar places, people tend to look up Points of Interest (POIs) information either on the Internet or by asking locals. To benefit from content on the Internet, the travellers pay more attention to the graphically rendered information on the screen rather than the environment, which can lead to road accidents. Moreover, asking pedestrians for POI information often proves to be misleading. To overcome this problem, the transmission of location-based information is done in Augmented Reality (AR). The process results in less cognitive and physical activities as the users are not obliged to switch attention back and forth between information space and real-world view. In AR, location-based information appears immediately without blocking the real-world view. As a result, the LocatAR, an application is built as a personal tour guide, using location data to identify a POI in Augmented Reality (AR).LocatAR database contains Google Maps coordinates, phone numbers, and website links that represent each POI. Building LocatAR involves no AR Foundation and AR SDKs, which makes the software cost-effective, run on AR incompatible smartphones, and lightweight. To evaluate the application,thirty volunteers use LocatAR to complete a questionnaire for 14-days qualitative research. Ultimately, the study revealed 70% of the participants agreed that LocatAR correctly identifies POIs and delivers enough POI information.

References

  1. Gaurav Bhorkar. 2017. A survey of augmented reality navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.05006(2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.05006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Komang Candra Brata and Deron Liang. 2019. An effective approach to develop location-based augmented reality information support.International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering (2088-8708) 9, 4(2019). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i4.pp3060-3068Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlos Carbonell Carrera and Luis Alberto Bermejo Asensio. 2017. Augmented reality as a digital teaching environment to develop spatial thinking. Cartography and geographic information science 44, 3 (2017), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2016.1145556Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Namho Chung, Hyunae Lee, Jin-Young Kim, and Chulmo Koo. 2018. The role of augmented reality for experience-influenced environments: The case of cultural heritage tourism in Korea. Journal of Travel Research 57, 5 (2018), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517708255Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eleanor E Cranmer, M Claudia tom Dieck, and Paraskevi Fountoulaki. 2020. Exploring the value of augmented reality for tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives 35 (2020), 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100672Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Aaron L Gardony, Tad T Brunyé, Caroline R Mahoney, and Holly A Taylor. 2013. How navigational aids impair spatial memory: Evidence for divided attention. Spatial Cognition & Computation 13, 4 (2013), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2013.792821Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ryohei Hashimoto and Michael Cohen. 2021. Outdoor Navigation System by AR. In SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 102. EDP Sciences, 04002. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110204002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Paul Haynes, Sigrid Hehl-Lange, and Eckart Lange. 2018. Mobile augmented reality for flood visualisation. Environmental modelling & software 109 (2018), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zheng-Yu Hoe, I-Jui Lee, Chien-Hsu Chen, and Kuo-Ping Chang. 2019. Using an augmented reality-based training system to promote spatial visualization ability for the elderly. Universal Access in the Information Society 18, 2 (2019), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0597-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Thomas Köppel, M Eduard Gröller, and Hsiang-Yun Wu. 2021. Context-Responsive Labeling in Augmented Reality. In 2021 IEEE 14th Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). IEEE, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis52677.2021.00020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alice Lo Valvo, Daniele Croce, Domenico Garlisi, Fabrizio Giuliano, Laura Giarré, and Ilenia Tinnirello. 2021. A Navigation and Augmented Reality System for Visually Impaired People. Sensors 21, 9 (2021), 3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093061Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Priyakrushna Mohanty, Azizul Hassan, and Erdogan Ekis. 2020. Augmented reality for relaunching tourism post-COVID-19: socially distant, virtually connected. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes(2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-07-2020-0073Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ian T Ruginski, Sarah H Creem-Regehr, Jeanine K Stefanucci, and Elizabeth Cashdan. 2019. GPS use negatively affects environmental learning through spatial transformation abilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 64 (2019), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Paul Ruvolo. 2021. Considering Spatial Cognition of Blind Travelers in Utilizing Augmented Reality for Navigation. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops). IEEE, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComWorkshops51409.2021.9430997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ryo Sasaki and Kayoko Yamamoto. 2019. A Sightseeing Support System Using Augmented Reality and Pictograms within Urban Tourist Areas in Japan. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8, 9(2019), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8090381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Avinash Kumar Singh, Jia Liu, Carlos A Tirado Cortes, and Chin-Teng Lin. 2021. Virtual Global Landmark: An Augmented Reality Technique to Improve Spatial Navigation Learning. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M Claudia tom Dieck, Timothy Hyungsoo Jung, and Philipp A Rauschnabel. 2018. Determining visitor engagement through augmented reality at science festivals: An experience economy perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 82 (2018), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Piotr A Werner. 2019. Review of implementation of augmented reality into the georeferenced analogue and digital maps and images. Information 10, 1 (2019), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10010012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Jason Wither, Stephen DiVerdi, and Tobias Höllerer. 2009. Annotation in outdoor augmented reality. Computers & Graphics 33, 6 (2009), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2009.06.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. LocatAR - An Augmented Reality Application for Local Points of Interest Identification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCA '22: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing Advancements
      March 2022
      543 pages
      ISBN:9781450397346
      DOI:10.1145/3542954

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 August 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format