skip to main content
10.1145/3543174.3545254acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Lab-Based Investigation of Reaction Time and Reading Performance using Different In-Vehicle Reading Interfaces during Self-Driving

Published: 17 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The demand for autonomous vehicles (AVs) is rapidly growing these years. As AVs have a potential to free drivers’ cognitive resources from driving to other tasks, reading is one of the common activities users conduct in travel multitasking. Nevertheless, ways to supporting reading in AVs have been little explored. To fill this gap, we explored the design of an in-vehicle reader on a windshield in AVs along three dimensions: dynamics, position, and text segmentation. We conducted two in-lab within-subject experiments to examine the eight kinds of in-car reading modalities that represented the combinations of the three dimensions in terms of drivers’ reaction time and reading comprehension. Our results show a case where an adaptive positioning would be particularly beneficial for supporting reading in AVs. And our general suggestion is to use a static reading zone presented on-sky and in sentences because it leads to faster reaction and better reading comprehension.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary file (automotiveui22-6-sup.pdf)
MP4 File (video.mp4)
Demo video

References

[1]
H Bouma and AH De Voogd. 1974. On the control of eye saccades in reading. Vision Research 14, 4 (1974), 273–284.
[2]
Fu-Hsiang Chan, Yu-Ting Chen, Yu Xiang, and Min Sun. 2017. Anticipating Accidents in Dashcam Videos. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Springer, Cham, Cham, 136–153.
[3]
Vassilis Charissis and Stylianos Papanastasiou. 2010. Human–machine collaboration through vehicle head up display interface. Cognition, Technology & Work 12, 1 (2010), 41–50.
[4]
Chien-Hsiung Chen and Yu-Hung Chien. 2005. Effect of Dynamic Display and Speed of Display Movement on Reading Chinese Text Presented on a Small Screen. Perceptual and Motor Skills 100, 3 (2005), 865–873. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.100.3.865-873 16060457.
[5]
Chien-Hsiung Chen and Yu-Hung Chien. 2005. Reading Chinese text on a small screen with RSVP. Displays 26, 3 (2005), 103 – 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2005.02.004
[6]
Thomas G Cocklin, Nicklas J Ward, Hsuan-Chih Chen, and James F Juola. 1984. Factors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments. Memory & Cognition 12, 5 (1984), 431–442.
[7]
David Crundall, Geoffrey Underwood, and Peter Chapman. 1999. Driving experience and the functional field of view. Perception 28, 9 (1999), 1075–1087.
[8]
Rita Cyganski, Eva Fraedrich, and Barbara Lenz. 2015. Travel-time valuation for automated driving: A use-case-driven study. In Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the TRB. Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA.
[9]
Mary C Dyson and Mark Haselgrove. 2001. The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54, 4 (2001), 585–612.
[10]
Kai Eckoldt, Martin Knobel, Marc Hassenzahl, and Josef Schumann. 2012. An experiential perspective on advanced driver assistance systems. it - Information Technology 54, 4 (2012), 165–171.
[11]
Dick Ettema and Laura Verschuren. 2007. Multitasking and value of travel time savings. Transportation Research Record 2010, 1 (01 2007), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2010-03
[12]
Kenneth I. Forster. 1970. Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 4 (jul 1970), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210208
[13]
Joseph L Gabbard, Gregory M Fitch, and Hyungil Kim. 2014. Behind the glass: Driver challenges and opportunities for AR automotive applications. Proc. IEEE 102, 2 (2014), 124–136.
[14]
Wolfgang Gaebel, G Ulrich, and K Frick. 1987. Visuomotor performance of schizophrenic patients and normal controls in a picture viewing task. Biological Psychiatry 22, 10 (1987), 1227–1237.
[15]
Christian Gold, D. Dambock, Lutz Lorenz, and Klaus Bengler. 2013. ”Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57 (09 2013), 1938–1942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433
[16]
Christian Gold, Frederik Naujoks, Jonas Radlmayr, Hanna Bellem, and Oliver Jarosch. 2018. Testing Scenarios for Human Factors Research in Level 3 Automated Vehicles. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, Neville A Stanton (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 551–559.
[17]
Cameron Grout, William Rogers, Mark Apperley, and Steve Jones. 2015. Reading text in an immersive head-mounted display: An investigation into displaying desktop interfaces in a 3D virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 15th New Zealand Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808047.2808055
[18]
Renate Haeuslschmid, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2016. A Design Space to Support the Development of Windshield Applications for the Car. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5076–5091. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858336
[19]
Renate Haeuslschmid, Yixin Shou, John O’Donovan, Gary Burnett, and Andreas Butz. 2016. First steps towards a view management concept for large-sized head-up displays with continuous depth. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive’UI 16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005418
[20]
Joanne L Harbluk, Y Ian Noy, Patricia L Trbovich, and Moshe Eizenman. 2007. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: Impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 39, 2 (2007), 372–379.
[21]
Anneke Heitmann, Rainer Guttkuhn, Acacia Aguirre, Udo Trutschel, and Martin Moore-Ede. 2001. Technologies for the monitoring and prevention of driver fatigue, In Proceedings of the First International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Proceedings of the First International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design 1, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1013
[22]
Brian L Hills. 1980. Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception 9, 2 (1980), 183–216.
[23]
Juvenile & Children’s Publishing House. 1991. One Hundred Thousand Whys(1st. ed.). International Juvenile, Taipei, Taiwan.
[24]
Ching-Yu Hsieh, Yi-Shyuan Chiang, Hung-Yu Chiu, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2020. Bridging the Virtual and Real Worlds: A Preliminary Study of Messaging Notifications in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–14.
[25]
SAE International. 2021. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. SAE Technical Standards J3016. Society of Automotive Engineering.
[26]
Peter Johnston. 1984. Prior Knowledge and Reading Comprehension Test Bias. Reading Research Quarterly 19, 2 (1984), 219–239. http://www.jstor.org/stable/747364
[27]
Uijong Ju, Lewis L. Chuang, and Christian Wallraven. 2020. Acoustic Cues Increase Situational Awareness in Accident Situations: A VR Car-Driving Study. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems Early Access(2020), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.3035374
[28]
David B. Kaber, Yulan Liang, Yu Zhang, Meghan L. Rogers, and Shruti Gangakhedkar. 2012. Driver performance effects of simultaneous visual and cognitive distraction and adaptation behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15, 5(2012), 491 – 501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.05.004
[29]
Susan Kenyon. 2010. What do we mean by multitasking? – Exploring the need for methodological clarification in time use research. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research 7, 1 (October 2010), 42–60.
[30]
Hyang Sook Kim, Sol Hee Yoon, Meen Jong Kim, and Yong Gu Ji. 2015. Deriving Future User Experiences in Autonomous Vehicle. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications(AutomotiveUI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809734
[31]
Dee Kivett, Victor Gallas Cervo, Aparna Mantha, and John Smith. 2015. Improvement of Blind Spot Alert Detection by Elderly Drivers. Technical Report. SAE Technical Paper.
[32]
Alex Leykin and Mihran Tuceryan. 2004. Determining Text Readability over Textured Backgrounds in Augmented Reality Systems. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry(Singapore) (VRCAI ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 436–439. https://doi.org/10.1145/1044588.1044683
[33]
Andrés Lucero. 2015. Using affinity diagrams to evaluate interactive prototypes. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 (Cham, 2015), Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Bamberg, Germany, 231–248.
[34]
Glenn Lyons and John Urry. 2005. Travel time use in the information age. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 39, 2 (2005), 257 – 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.004 Positive Utility of Travel.
[35]
Gloria Mark, Daniela Gudith, and Ulrich Klocke. 2008. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072
[36]
Michael EJ Masson. 1983. Conceptual processing of text during skimming and rapid sequential reading. Memory & cognition 11, 3 (1983), 262–274.
[37]
Vivien Melcher, Stefan Rauh, F. Diederichs, Harald Widlroither, and Wilhelm Bauer. 2015. Take-Over Requests for Automated Driving. Procedia Manufacturing 3 (12 2015), 2867–2873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.788
[38]
David Miller, Annabel Sun, Mishel Johns, Hillary Ive, David Sirkin, Sudipto Aich, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Distraction becomes engagement in automated driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59(2015), 1676–1680. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591362
[39]
Christopher A Monk, Deborah A Boehm-Davis, George Mason, and J Gregory Trafton. 2004. Recovering from interruptions: Implications for driver distraction research. Human factors 46, 4 (2004), 650–663.
[40]
Michael A. Moore, Patrícia S. Lavieri, Felipe F. Dias, and Chandra R. Bhat. 2020. On investigating the potential effects of private autonomous vehicle use on home/work relocations and commute times. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 110 (2020), 166 – 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.11.013
[41]
A. Moujahid, M. ElAraki Tantaoui, M. D. Hina, A. Soukane, A. Ortalda, A. ElKhadimi, and A. Ramdane-Cherif. 2018. Machine Learning Techniques in ADAS: A Review. In 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering (ICACCE). IEEE, Paris, France, 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCE.2018.8441758
[42]
Amir Mukhtar, Likun Xia, and Tong Boon Tang. 2015. Vehicle detection techniques for collision avoidance systems: A review. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 16, 5 (10 2015), 2318–2338. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2409109
[43]
Vidhya Navalpakkam and Elizabeth Churchill. 2012. Mouse tracking: measuring and predicting users’ experience of web-based content. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2963–2972. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208705
[44]
World Health Organization and NHTSA (U.S.). 2011. Mobile phone use: a growing problem of driver distraction. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
[45]
Nicole Perterer, Christiane Moser, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Alina Krischkowsky, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. Activities and Technology Usage While Driving: A Field Study with Private Short-Distance Car Commuters. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 41, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971556
[46]
Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating User Needs for Non-Driving-Related Activities during Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Rovaniemi, Finland) (MUM ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735
[47]
Mary L Phillips and Anthony S David. 1994. Understanding the symptoms of schizophrenia using visual scan paths. The British Journal of Psychiatry 165, 5 (1994), 673–675.
[48]
EC Poulton. 1962. Peripheral vision, refractoriness and eye movements in fast oral reading. British Journal of Psychology 53, 4 (1962), 409–419.
[49]
Jonas Radlmayr, Christian Gold, Lutz Lorenz, Mehdi Farid, and Klaus Bengler. 2014. How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58, 1(2014), 2063–2067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581434
[50]
Michael A. Regan, Charlene Hallett, and Craig P. Gordon. 2011. Driver distraction and driver inattention: Definition, relationship and taxonomy. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43, 5 (2011), 1771 – 1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.008
[51]
Michael A. Regan, John D. Lee, and Kristie Young (Eds.). 2008. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects and Mitigation (1st edition ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420007497
[52]
Andreas Riegler, Bilal Aksoy, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2020. Gaze-based Interaction with Windshield Displays for Automated Driving: Impact of Dwell Time and Feedback Design on Task Performance and Subjective Workload. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410654
[53]
Andreas Riegler, Klemens Weigl, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2020. StickyWSD: Investigating Content Positioning on a Windshield Display for Automated Driving. In 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Essen, Germany) (MUM 2020). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428361.3428405
[54]
Andreas Riener, Susanne Boll, and Andrew L. Kun. 2016. Automotive User Interfaces in the Age of Automation (Dagstuhl Seminar 16262). Dagstuhl Reports 6, 6 (2016), 111–159. https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.6.6.111
[55]
Gary S Rubin and Kathleen Turano. 1992. Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision research 32, 5 (1992), 895–902.
[56]
Rufat Rzayev, Polina Ugnivenko, Sarah Graf, Valentin Schwind, and Niels Henze. 2021. Reading in VR: The Effect of Text Presentation Type and Location. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 531, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445606
[57]
Timothy A. Salthouse and Cecil L. Ellis. 1980. Determinants of Eye-Fixation Duration. The American Journal of Psychology 93, 2 (1980), 207–234. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1422228
[58]
Dario D. Salvucci, Niels A. Taatgen, and Jelmer P. Borst. 2009. Toward a Unified Theory of the Multitasking Continuum: From Concurrent Performance to Task Switching, Interruption, and Resumption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1819–1828. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518981
[59]
Clemens Schartmüller, Andreas Riener, Philipp Wintersberger, and Anna-Katharina Frison. 2018. Workaholistic: On Balancing Typing- and Handover-Performance in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229459
[60]
Missie Smith, Joseph L Gabbard, and Christian Conley. 2016. Head-up vs. head-down displays: examining traditional methods of display assessment while driving. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive’UI 16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005419
[61]
Changeui Son, Seokmok Park, JaeMin Lee, and Joonki Paik. 2019. Context Aware Vehicle Detection using Correlation Filter. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2019.8661942
[62]
Hans Strasburger, Ingo Rentschler, and Martin Jüttner. 2011. Peripheral vision and pattern recognition: A review. Journal of vision 11, 5 (2011), 13–13.
[63]
Qiuyang Tang, Gang Guo, Zijian Zhang, Bingbing Zhang, and Yingzhang Wu. 2021. Olfactory facilitation of takeover performance in highly automated driving. Human factors 63, 4 (2021), 553–564.
[64]
Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski, Klaus Dietz, and the IReST Study Group. 2012. Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance: The New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 53, 9 (08 2012), 5452–5461. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8284 arXiv:https://arvojournals.org/arvo/content_public/journal/iovs/933252/i1552-5783-53-9-5452.pdf
[65]
Remo MA van der Heiden, Shamsi T Iqbal, and Christian P Janssen. 2017. Priming drivers before handover in semi-autonomous cars. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025507
[66]
Volkswagen. 2020. Head-up-Display. MotorTrend. Retrieved August 14, 2021 from https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/de/head-up-display-3957
[67]
Guoyan Wang and Junfei Du. 2018. One Hundred Thousand Whys: A Classic in Chinese Book History. Science Communication 40, 5 (2018), 678–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018792570
[68]
Christopher D. Wickens. 2002. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science 3, 2 (01 2002), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
[69]
Christopher D. Wickens. 2008. Multiple Resources and Mental Workload. Human Factors 50, 3 (2008), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394 18689052.
[70]
Philipp Wintersberger, Paul Green, and Andreas Riener. 2017. Am I Driving or Are You or Are We Both? A Taxonomy for Handover and Handback in Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. The National Advanced Driving Simulator, Manchester Village, Vermont, USA. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1655
[71]
Maryanne Wolf and Stephanie Gottwald. 2016. Tales of literacy for the 21st century. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
[72]
Priscilla NY Wong, Duncan P Brumby, Harsha Vardhan Ramesh Babu, and Kota Kobayashi. 2019. Voices in Self-Driving Cars Should be Assertive to More Quickly Grab a Distracted Driver’s Attention. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344535

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Move, Connect, Interact: Introducing a Design Space for Cross-Traffic InteractionProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785808:3(1-40)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Assessing Drivers' Situation Awareness in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles: ASP based Characterisations of Driving Dynamics for Modelling Scene Interpretation and ProjectionElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science10.4204/EPTCS.385.29385(300-313)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2023

Index Terms

  1. A Lab-Based Investigation of Reaction Time and Reading Performance using Different In-Vehicle Reading Interfaces during Self-Driving

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AutomotiveUI '22: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2022
    371 pages
    ISBN:9781450394154
    DOI:10.1145/3543174
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 September 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Automated driving
    2. comprehension
    3. handover
    4. multitasking
    5. reading interface
    6. safety
    7. user study
    8. windshield display

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)65
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Move, Connect, Interact: Introducing a Design Space for Cross-Traffic InteractionProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36785808:3(1-40)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2024
    • (2023)Assessing Drivers' Situation Awareness in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles: ASP based Characterisations of Driving Dynamics for Modelling Scene Interpretation and ProjectionElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science10.4204/EPTCS.385.29385(300-313)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media