skip to main content
10.1145/3543321.3543353acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Structural Examination and Exploration of Chinese University Students’ Satisfaction with MOOCs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Chinese universities are suspending offline teaching in favor of online education, with MOOCs as one of the main forms of education, and more and more students are attending MOOCs. Satisfaction surveys can reasonably explore the effectiveness of MOOCs, promoting their high-quality development and improving education reform in Chinese colleges and universities. In this paper, we have designed a questionnaire on the satisfaction of Chinese university students with MOOCs during the COVID-19 pandemic and found that three factors, specifically the quality of MOOCs, the teaching method, and the student's self-adjustment ability of learning, have a positive and significant impact on students’ satisfaction with MOOCs.

References

  1. Meltem Huri Baturay. 2015. An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 (2015), 427–433. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ministry of Education. 2019. China MOOC Action Declaration. (April 2019). Retrieved January 10, 2022 from http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A08/A08_ztzl/ztzl_zxkf/201904/t20190418_378663.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yue Wu. 2020. The number and application scale of MOOCs in China ranks first in the world. People's Daily (December 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Xiuhong Zhao, Jiayuan Wang. 2020. Create a new peak of online teaching in colleges and universities in practice. China Education News. May 5, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tian Qu. 2020. The First World MOOC Conference Held at Tsinghua University. (2020). Retrieved January 10, 2022 from https://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1666/70239.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. XieHuiying and Mai Qiang. 2021. College English cross-cultural teaching based on cloud computing MOOC platform and artificial intelligence. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 40, 4 (2021), 7335–7345. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/jifs-189558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yanqi Wang. 2021. Research on flipped classroom of big data course based on graphic design MOOC. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2021 (2021), 1–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4042459Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. TingtingDuan. 2019. A study of learning effects in MOOC: An example of ideological and Political Education courses in China. Advances in Intelligent, Interactive Systems and Applications (2019), 611–619. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02804-6_80Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yanrong Wang, Chunyu Dong, and Xiaowen Zhang. 2020. Improving MOOC learning performance in China: An analysis of factors from the TAM and TPB. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 28, 6 (2020), 1421–1433. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cae.22310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tai Wang, Mei Yang, and Juhong Liu. 2020. The effects of teachers’ feedback on learners’ cognitive level in MOOC forums: from Broom's taxonomy perspective. Open Education Research 26, 2 (April 2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bing Wu. 2021. The influence of MOOC forum feedback on learning progress. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 4 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Aili Tian, Tianzhen Yu, and Rui Wan. 2020. middle school students’ MOOC learning experience: connotation, current situation and optimization path - an empirical analysis based on the G MOOC platform in Shanghai. Modern Educational Technology 30, 8 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu Qiao and Fengguang Jiang. 2020. Clustering analysis of MOOC learner groups - taking the MOOC of “STEM course design and case study” for example. Modern Educational Technology 30, 1 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Eamon Costello, James Brunton, Mark Brown, and Laurence Daly. 2018. In MOOCs WE Trust: Learner Perceptions of MOOC quality via trust and credibility. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 13, 06 (2018), 214. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8447Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daeyeoul Lee, Sunnie Lee Watson, and William R. Watson. 2020. The influence of successful MOOC learners’ self-regulated learning strategies, self-efficacy, and task value on their perceived effectiveness of a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 21, 3 (2020). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4642Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dilrukshi Gamage and Mark E. Whitting. 2021. Together we learn better: Leveraging Communities of Practice for MOOC learners. Asian CHI Symposium 2021 (2021). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3429360.3468176Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kseniia A. Vilkova. 2019. Self-regulated learning and successful MOOC completion. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2356 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. KrenarePireva, Ali Shariq Imran, and FisnikDalipi. 2015. User behaviour analysis on LMS and MOOC. 2015 IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e) (2015). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ic3e.2015.7403480Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Andrew J. Vickers and Elena B. Elkin. 2006. Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models. Medical Decision Making 26, 6 (2006), 565–574. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989x06295361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICDEL '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning
    May 2022
    318 pages
    ISBN:9781450396417
    DOI:10.1145/3543321

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 August 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format