skip to main content
10.1145/3543321.3543360acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Perceptions of Vietnamese Lecturers and Administrators on STEAM Competence and Developing Students’ Competences in STEAM Education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary learning in schools has become a popular and rapidly rising subject of focus for educational reform across the world. This sparks discussion on STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics), which is changing educational paradigms by incorporating art into STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects. Understanding the nature of STEAM correctly is one of the deciding factors to the success of STEAM implementation. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate how lecturers and administrators of an institution of higher education in Vietnam perceive STEAM education and its developing students’ competences. The qualitative data were collected from semi-structure interviews with 6 academics and managers from two campuses of this institution. The results show that they have positive perceptions towards STEAM education. Students enter college with a set of well-rounded skills that will assist them in adapting to a continuously changing and fast-paced workplace, regardless of the specific role or industry. STEAM combines important disciplines to create a welcoming learning environment that encourages all students to engage, contribute, and problem solve.

References

  1. Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components. Pittsburgh, PA: Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rolling Jr., J. H. (2016). Reinventing the STEAM engine for art+ design education. Art Education, 69(4), 4–7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cameron, Pham, & Atherton. (2018). FutureVietnameseDigitalEconomy.pdf (No. 1stt; The Vietnam's Future Digital Economy Project, p. 60).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lathan, J. (2015). STEAM Education: A 21st Century Approach to Learning. University of San Diego. https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/steam-education-in-schools/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kang, N.-H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Park, H., Byun, S., Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 12(7), 1739–1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531aGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2016). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2016). Analysis of Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ changing attitudes about integrated STEAM pedagogy through developing lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9709-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. European Schoolnet. (2018). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics education policies in Europe: Scientix observatory report October 2018. https://www.scientix.eu/documents/10137/782005/Scientix_Texas-Instruments_STEM-policies-October-2018.pdf/d56db8e4-cef1-4480-a420-1107bae513d5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Women Entrepreneur for Africa. (2020). STEAM education & entrepreneurship for African women & girls. Women Entrepreneurs for Africa. https://weforafrica.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kruger, D. (2019, February 20). Inspire Africa launches innovative STEAM program for SA schools. IT News Africa: Africa's Technology News Leader. https://www.itnewsafrica.com/2019/02/inspireafrica-launches-innovative-steam-program-for-sa-schools/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. STEAM Foundation NPC. (2020). STEAM foundation activity. https://steamfoundation.org.za/ what-we-offer-2/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fullbright. (2019, April 22). STEAM Education in Vietnam: Prospects and Drawbacks. Fulbright University Vietnam. https://fulbright.edu.vn/steam-education-in-vietnam-prospects-and-drawbacks/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed). Boston McGraw-Hill. https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/266489177Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Newcomer, Hatry, & Wholey. (2015). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (4th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Handbook+of+Practical+Program+Evaluation%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781118893609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Marks, D., & Yardley, L. (2004). Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alhojailan, M. I. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39–47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547-552.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Conley, M., Douglass, L. and Trinkley, R. (2014), “Using inquiry principles of art to explore mathematical practice standards”, Middle Grades Research Journal, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 89-101Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh, M. (2021). Acquisition of 21st century skills through STEAM education. Academia Letters, 2, 712.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gess, A.H. (2017), “STEAM education: separating fact from fiction”, Technology and Engineering Teacher, Vol. 77 No. 3, pp. 39-41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jia, Y., Zhou, B., & Zheng, X. (2021). A Curriculum Integrating STEAM and Maker Education Promotes Pupils' Learning Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Interdisciplinary Knowledge Acquisition. Frontiers in psychology, 3652.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Perceptions of Vietnamese Lecturers and Administrators on STEAM Competence and Developing Students’ Competences in STEAM Education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICDEL '22: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning
      May 2022
      318 pages
      ISBN:9781450396417
      DOI:10.1145/3543321

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 August 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format