skip to main content
10.1145/3543377.3543382acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbbtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation model and efficacy of multimodal ultrasound imaging technology to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Published: 08 August 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of multimodal ultrasound imaging indicators in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, and to establish a multivariate Logistic regression model for evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 38 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was divided into pathologically ineffective (NMHR) and pathologically effective (MHR) according to Miller & Payne grading method. The image characteristics of conventional ultrasound, elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate Logistic analyses were used to analyze factors affecting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The receiver operating curve (ROC) of each factor was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve and evaluation indicators such as sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the effective group (MHR), the tumor's longest diameter reduction rate (ΔD), morphology, margin, posterior echo attenuation, calcification, resistance index (RI), peak systole velocity (peak systole velocity, PSV), strain ratio (SR), elasticity score, peak intensity (PI) and time to peak (TTP) were the factors affecting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P<0.05). The factor Logistic regression model showed that the longest tumor diameter reduction rate, PSV, SR, PI, TTP were reliable factors for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. The area under the ROC curve of the multivariate logistic regression model was 0.911, and the sensitivity and specificity were 94.7% and 68.4%, respectively, which had higher accuracy than the single-factor model. Conclusion: The multivariate regression model of multimodal ultrasound imaging technology can evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and improve the diagnostic coincidence rate and efficacy.

References

[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CAACancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-49.
[2]
"Expert Consensus on Pathological Diagnosis of Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer (Edition)" Writing Group. Expert Consensus on Pathological Diagnosis of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer (2020 Edition) [J]. Chinese Journal of Pathology, 2020, 49 (4 ): 296- 304.
[3]
Leng Xiaoling, Ma Fucheng. Ultrasound research progress of breast cancer tumor microenvironment[J]. China Journal of Clinical Medical Imaging, 2015, 26(11): 823-6.
[4]
Zhao Jing, Jing Hui. Application of multimodal ultrasound technology in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [J]. Modern Oncology, 2020, 28(23): 4181-4184.
[5]
Peng Juan, Deng Qing, Cao Sheng, Jia Yan, Zhou Qing. The value of ultrasound quantitative parameters in early prediction of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasound Imaging, 2021,30(06):513-518.
[6]
Le Ting. Diagnostic value of breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced prediction model for precancerous lesions of breast cancer [D]. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2018.
[7]
Shen Yang. The value of conventional ultrasound combined with panoramic technique in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [D]. Guangxi Medical University, 2017.
[8]
Yang Yuejie. Application analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [J]. Shanxi Medicine Journal, 2019, 48(02): 166-167.
[9]
Han Yanfeng, Zou Shuwei, Wang Baohua. The application of ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [J]. China Medical Herald, 2018,15(16):114-117.
[10]
Xiang Bin. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with elastography quantitative analysis for responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer [J]. Contemporary Medicine, 2021, 27(15): 95-98.
  1. Evaluation model and efficacy of multimodal ultrasound imaging technology to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBBT '22: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology
    May 2022
    190 pages
    ISBN:9781450396387
    DOI:10.1145/3543377
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 August 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Breast cancer
    2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    3. Elastic ultrasound
    4. Multimodal ultrasound imaging technology
    5. Prediction model
    6. neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • Qiqihar Academy of Medical Sciences

    Conference

    ICBBT 2022

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 46
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media